Taxes & Jurisdiction
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2018 5:12 am
I'm re-posting this and the following post from the yahoo group https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/whoru/info.
I've corresponded with the owner of the group Eric Williams for about 6 years, and applied what he's taught (free of charge) for about 4.
Eric is about 85 years old and was involved in the freedom movement since 1964.
********************************
Hi Group,
In regard to the use of my Notice and Demand by Paytri-Idiots, in conjunction with a court case. I have been in this Freedom Fight since 1964. In the beginning, not knowing any better, I accepted the teachings then prevalent among adherents. During my early years I learned most of what was then prevalent was total nonsense, non-think Paytri-Idiot Rat Poison. Unfortunately, this same nonsense is even more wide spread today than back then.
I suffered through it all until 1970, when I was prosecuted by the IRS for criminally failing to file or pay income tax. I went to Federal District Court in Los Angeles in 1970, all by myself, with absolutely no plan of defense. I had filed no documents with the Federal Prosecutor or Federal Court. I was confident my Creator would guide me safely through the battle, or not, as He determined my situation and outcome would best serve His intentions.
-----------------------------------------------------
There were only five people in the Federal courtroom - the Judge, Bailiff, Clerk, IRS Prosecutor and me.
The case was called, the Prosecutor stood and said, "Citizens of the United States have an obligation to blah, blah, blah..."", at which time I stood and said, "I object."
Federal Judge, "Why are you objecting? He hasn't said anything yet."
Me: "Well, he said citizens of the United States have all those obligations he was listing and that may be true, but he doesn't have anything in his file to put me in that class."
Judge: "Are you renouncing your citizenship?"
Me: "How can I renounce that which I never applied for?"
Judge: "Where were you born?"
Me: "At the time of my birth I had just gone through a terrible ordeal, I was gasping for breath, I could not read or write, I did not know who I was, where I was, or even what I was."
Judge: "What did your mother tell you?"
Me: "At the time of my birth I did not then understand the child mother relationship, I could not pick my mother from a lineup of one."
Judge: "What was on your birth certificate?
Me: "At the time of my birth I was not then aware of the importance of such a document. I do not know if one was created or not and I deny that any was, and" (pointing my finger at the IRS prosecutor, I said), "He can't prove it."
Judge: "I am taking this matter under consideration and you will be notified."
That was 45 years ago, and I am still waiting. I have never ever filed or paid or been bothered by the IRS.
There was no suggestion during that short criminal trial that I was not born in California. If the Fourteenth Amendment or any of those Federal laws declaring citizenship were meaningful, then why did that Federal Judge not simply declare me a citizen and continue with the prosecution?
A few years later while I was operating my own very successful and profitable furniture manufacturing company in Southern California, as I was walking out of my office early one afternoon, to get in my new Cadillac (paid for with cash), to go call on retail store customers; I was walking past a white car driving into the parking lot, the driver of the car called to me by name, he did not ask me who I was, he said, while flashing his IRS Special Agent Badge on me:"Mr. Williams, may we speak to you a moment?" I looked down into the car and the driver then said, showing me a check: "Would you please be so kind as to identify your endorsement of this check?" It was a $2,000.00 cashiers check that had been paid to me a few years prior, as partial payment for my construction of a room addition on a man's home.
I said to the driver: "You are wanting me to help you prosecute someone for not paying their income tax?" He acknowledged that was the case. I said, "I cannot believe that you would think that I would help you. I do not see the check, any endorsement nor you. Please stay out of my life and leave me alone." I then turned to my new Fleetwood Brougham deElegance Cadillac to continue on my business errands.
The point of this Dear Group, is that the IRS knew where I was, what I was doing, that I was making a ton of money (which my wife spent faster than I could get it), and that I was not filing or paying, and the IRS has never bothered me in any way.
I have mentioned this many times on my radio talk shows and otherwise such as in this writing to you.
The reason I was prosecuted in 1970 was because I had become a very outspoken leader in the anti income tax rebellion of Southern California in 1968-69. During that rebellion I had a partner who was financially very well off, who paid for the thousands of flyers that were distributed all over Southern California advertising our anti income tax meeting, with my picture printed on them, where I gave all of the meeting anti income-tax presentations.
My partner was charged with criminal violations the same as I. He went to Federal court with an attorney. He was convicted and spent 2-1/2 years in Federal prison, with a $10K fine and probation after release. His attorney did not challenge the jurisdiction of the IRS. I was the one the IRS really wanted, but they could not get me because they could not establish political jurisdiction over me!
About six months after my partner's release from prison, I was visiting him at his home, where he showed me a newspaper item recounting a casual conversation at an airport coffee shop between two tax protestors and an off duty IRS prosecutor.
During this conversation the prosecutor was asked why IRS prosecutors asked tax defendants in criminal court if they were citizens of the United States. The prosecutor said that if the defendant was not a citizen of the United states, or did not admit to it, that the IRS had no jurisdiction over that person.
What all those non-thinking persons in the Paytri-Idiot community have missed is the very important, critically important, prohibition of involuntary servitude principle established in the Thirteenth Amendment, which constitutes the codification of Natural Law into the Federal Constitution.
It matters not what you claim Dear Group Member, but making the wrong claim can cause you to lose, so then DON'T CLAIM ANYTHING!!! All that matters in a confrontation with the government is what the IRS or other government entity can prove. So keep your mouth shut and don't give them something to use against you!
In order for the government to prove anything, case law establishes that the government must have a living eyewitness to come forward and testify that the eyewitness saw and heard you claim to be a citizen of the United States, or otherwise volunteer yourself into government servitude, such as having observed you applying for a driver license. And that still would not establish jurisdiction because your responding argument and cross examination of their witness will establish that the only reason you ever complied with any of that (if you did, which you do NOT admit), was because the government had fraudulently indoctrinated you as a child, in its indoctrination centers, commonly known as public schools, to wrongly believe that you had been born into United States citizenship.
Where and when Dear Group Member, did the government ever inform you that it had no authority to require you to do anything, unless and until after you volunteered to submit yourself to its political jurisdiction?
In regard to my incident in Federal Court in 1970, pay attention to what the judge did NOT ask! He did not ask if I had a driver license, a SS# number or if I used Federal Reserve Notes to purchase my food or if I received any manner of benefit which the Paytri-Idiots claim cause adhesion contracts - all being nothing but more Paytri-Idiot BS - Rat Poison!!!
Every question the Federal Judge asked me during that aborted trial, was directly aimed at establishing my United States citizenship. The word "citizen" carries with it a self evident inherent automatic acknowledgment of political subservience to a political superior! Does it take a rocket scientist to figure that out? And how is State Citizenship any lesser of an evil? Get REAL!!!
As an aside, in regard to persons born on this land, in regard to their obligation to pay income tax: citizenship is the primary means by which the government obtains the voluntary submission of otherwise politically independent persons to be politically subservient. However, there are other means whereby the government can acquire political jurisdiction, that do not include or involve citizenship, but are none-the-less, voluntary on the part of the tax-payer.
The reason I mention all this to you Dear Group Members, is because all too many of those who have used my documents in the past, who have been wrongly indoctrinated with Paytri-Idiocy, think they are smarter than me, and have edited my very carefully worded documents in a manner that has caused them to be dismissed by the courts as frivolous.
I have a man in Illinois who has properly used a special version of my N&D to prevent eminent domain access to his property by an electrical power company that has laid out a route for its new very high voltage lethal radiation emitting power line across this man's property, and my properly served N&D has stopped the power company from access to this man's property.
The Illinois Court that handles all eminent domain cases is refusing to do anything against this man until the power company presents proof that Illinois has properly gained political jurisdiction over this man, so that Illinois would have political jurisdiction enabling Illinois to exercise its eminent domain authority over him, which the power company will never be able to present, because Illinois does not any such political jurisdiction evidence in its state files.
My wife, who I met about 2-1/2 years ago. During my explanation to her of my IRS elimination procedures, she informed me that she had at that time recently entered into an agreement with the IRS for her to make monthly payments of $600.00 to the IRS, against an agreed upon previous tax liability.
When she first mentioned this to me she then informed me that she had mailed her second $600.00 check to the IRS just two days prior.
I clarified that, "You mean day before yesterday?" She acknowledged the affirmative. Because it had been only two days it was most likely that her $600.00 check had not yet reached her bank. I then prevailed upon her to call her bank and put a stop payment order on that second $600.00 check, which she did then do.
I then created IRS letter #1, a quickie letter for her to immediately send to the IRS. During the following week or so, I created IRS letter #2 for her, which she mailed to the IRS a week or so later.
A short time after that she received a nasty threatening letter from a different IRS office. I then wrote IRS Letter #3 which she mailed to that new IRS office, including a copy of her first two letters to the original IRS office.
A couple weeks later she received a letter from the state income tax office. (I think this was instigated by the IRS). I then created a letter for her to send to that state office, enclosing a copy of all three of her letters to the IRS. It has now been well over two years and she has heard no more from the IRS or state income tax office. And, she still uses her driver license, SS#, and receives her monthly SS deposit to her same bank account the IRS had previously threatened to confiscate, and threatened to take her SS payments, and put a lien on her house. None of which has the IRS done after receiving the letters I wrote for her, similar to my N&D, challenging the IRS to prove the Federal Government had gained political jurisdiction over her in full compliance with the Thirteenth Amendment.
I had all these IRS letters and my N&D posted on my regular Yahoo whoru group so anyone could copy them down, but as I mentioned herein above, too many Paytri-Idiots were taking them and editing them with Paytri-Idiot gibberish that served no purpose other than to red flag the documents as having been edited by ignorant scoff-laws who had copied the documents off the Internet, who did not understand the Basic Irrefutable Foundation of Political Jurisdiction, as is continually evidenced by their continual blathering of their totally idiotic Paytri-Idiot BS, as I will refer to herein below.
Because of this problem of Paytri-Idiot editing of my documents, I removed my documents from my regular Yahoo Group and posted them on a members by invitation only Yahoo Group, so I have some control over how my documents will be used, with no unauthorized Paytri-Idiot editing.
------------------------------------------------------
This country was never intended to be a republic by the commoners who participated in the Founding. There is nothing in the Federal Constitution that declares the Federal Government to be a republic - it is, unfortunately, a republic, but that was not declared to be the style of the Federal Government. A republic is not a form of government desired by a people who purport to be free!!!
How are the meanings of words established? NOT by the information printed in dictionaries! The purpose of dictionaries is to print the meanings of words as such meanings are established and changed or modified by the use of words in the day to day conversations and publications of the general public, or "otherwise". "Otherwise" meaning how certain words are used by those who use those certain words, where those words are not words commonly used in the day to day conversations of the general public. Such as the word "republic". What did the word " republic" actually mean, or refer to in 1787 when the CONstitution was written?
At that time, in 1787, there had never ever been any society in the recorded history of man, designated as being a "republic", where the government was under the control of the common people, which was the purported intention of the form of government intended to be created here, by those persons who had been mere commoners under the English Monarchy.
The true and actual meaning of the word "republic" has not actually changed during the past 230 years, except in the deluded minds of wishful thinking Paytri-Idiots! And it is established in the federal CONstitution, which is why I write it with the CON at the beginning. The meaning of the word "republic", by observation of those who actually use that evil word, indicates a political society with two political classes, (1) those who make the rules, and (2), those who follow or obey those rules.
To verify that, what do we have in "The People's Republic of China", and "The Democratic Republic of [North] Korea", and the now defunct "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics", and the "Republic of Cuba" and about a hundred other totalitarian dictatorships on this planet that have the word "republic" in the official name of their country.
In our CONstitution we have the ruling class, "People of the United States", established in the Preamble and reiterated in Amendments 1(in its second clause); in 2 (citizens have ZERO gun possession rights);in 4 (citizens have no arrest warrant or privacy protection); and in 9 and 10 (citizens have no final authority under 9 and 10).
In our CONstitution we have the acknowledged future existence of citizens of the United States in Section Two of Article One, in the eligibility requirements of such citizens to serve in the House of Representatives and Senate. This subservient class was not defined until 1868, in the Fourteenth Amendment, which most certainly does NOT declare that all persons born in the United States are thereby established as being citizens thereof. Pay attention to the words!!!
No matter the clear and open access to everything I have written here in regard to the word "republic" and how the meaning of words is established, we have multiplied thousands of Paytri-Idiots clamoring to "restore the republic". How brain dead can a person be and still be breathing?
And, the Congressional Act of 1867(?), creating a municipal government for Washington D.C., This Act did not cause the Federal Government to be a corporation and did not change the Constitution. All it did was accomplish the reasonable need of creating a municipal government for the general oversight and governing of the city that had established itself around the Capital of the Federation. In that Act, CONgress retains full ultimate control of that municipal government. Go read it for yourself; I have, several times. There is nothing wrong or devious in this Act of CONgress.
All governments on this planate are corporate. The PTA and the Boy Scouts, and the local Woman's clubs are all corporate, and there is nothing wrong with that. Being corporate does not mean they are incorporated.
And birth certificates are not bundled and sold to investors; and there are no money accounts created in regard to anyone's birth; and the Queen of England does not own the United States and neither does the Pope.
Writing your name in all caps or otherwise has no significance except in the pea brains of non-thinking Paytri-Idiots.
Rescission of documents is not necessary and is counter-productive! Gold fringe on the flag has no impactive significance and the courts are not operating under maritime law. This is all Paytri-Idiot gibberish - Rat Poison!
And, ESQ is most certainly NOT an indication or designation of nobility. Esq is, under English custom, the designation assigned to a vassal or servant of a Knight. An esquire is the vassal who polishes the Knights armor, grooms the Knight's horse and generally takes care of all the Knight's personal laundry. That is, an esquire is a vassal, a person who serves others. Now, is that not what an attorney does? So then, is it not entirely appropriate that an attorney put Esq after his name? Is it not apparent that the "leaders" of the Freedom Movement in this country have not done their homework?
-----------------------------------------------------------
There is only one issue Dear Group Member, the political jurisdiction of the government over the individual. This is true because everyone is born the same way, with no birth imbued authority over anyone. Governments are created by mere men, NOT gods! The men who create government cannot reasonably imbue their creation with any more authority that the authority naturally imbued into any one single individual man or woman.
The one and only way any government can gain mandatory subservience is through the voluntary agreement of each individual to submit himself to such dominion. The Federal Thirteenth Amendment acknowledges the Natural state of every person in its prohibition of involuntary servitude. This CONstitutional provision acknowledges that no government entity in this country has authority to declare any person to be subservient.
The reason our Freedom is under such serious attack is because of the magnetic attraction of the human mind to information for which it has no frame of reference to enable it to discern whether the information is good for the person or good for the teacher, a government agent, known as a school teacher.
Immeasurable evidence of this is observable everywhere by taking notice of the multiplied billions of dollars that are spent on advertising all manner of items and services.
Rest assured, those corporations would not be spending all that money if what I wrote in the preceding paragraph was not true!
When challenging the political Jurisdiction of the government, the individual must not make any claim of his political status. Whoever is making the claim assumes the burden of proof. The Federal Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition of involuntary servitude, totally ignored by the Freedom Movement, is critically important to extricating a person from the government's flypaper!
In every single court case, no matter the issue, the primary and first issue is political jurisdiction, NOT jurisdiction of the COURT; jurisdiction of the court is secondary.
The primary issue is the political jurisdiction of the GOVERNMENT, which is operated and managed by the Executive Branch. This places the burden of proving political jurisdiction on the Executive Branch, NOT on the court!
My Notice and Demand is served on the state government, on the Executive Branch (or Fed. likewise), requiring the official representing the State's Executive Branch to present proof from the State's existing files, that the state has gained political jurisdiction over the Wrongly Accused without the State (or Fed), violating the prohibition of involuntary servitude set forth in the Federal Thirteenth Amendment.
The court HAS NO STANDING to interact in the examination, establishment or determination of the political jurisdiction of the Executive Branch over the Wrongly Accused.
Once a challenge to political jurisdiction is asserted (served upon the States or authority claiming entity), no further action or proceedings of any manner can take place until proof of political jurisdiction is presented on the record!!! This is in accord with 45 appellate case citations that I include in Exhibit "A" to my Notice and Demand.
The problem with my N&D is its unquestionable POWER!!! It confronts the State with an issue that the State cannot win and dares not lose. It removes all government authority over the challenging person. In truth, my N&D establishes that the government never ever had proper political jurisdiction over anyone!!!
However, the judges are well schooled in their trickery, and are well aware that the vast majority of persons that present any manner of challenging documents, most likely copied them off the Internet and do not properly understand the content, and can easily be tricked because they will answer seemingly innocent questions, such as "State your name for the record", which, if complied with, will cause any N&D of mine to be negated, and the silly ignorant victim will claim my N&D does not work.
If you, for some unimagined reason, must present yourself in court, and you are called upon to state your name for the record, you should have a copy of the birth certificate with the name you have been led to believe and think is yours (but is NOT), entered thereon, so when the court asks you to state "your name" for the record, you stand up and, while holding the rolled up BC in your hand, extended out fully to the court, you say, "This here in my hand is the John Smith that you are concerned with; I am here to speak for him".
If they ask you who you are, you say, "It matters not who I am, but for the record, I am simply me."
If they ask you your name, you say, "What is a name and how does a person get one? And why would a person need or want one? It matters not who I am, however, I am simply me. It is my understanding that you are concerned with John Smith, I am here to speak for John Smith who I hold here in my hand."
If they ask you what it is that you hold in your hand, you say,"I hold here in my hand the John Smith that you are concerned with; for the answer to your question, you can determine that for yourself by looking hereon.", while you are extending the BC out to the court in your hand. You do not ever say that the document is a birth certificate.
It is important Dear Group Member, to understand that no one on this planet has any jurisdiction over anyone else, unless and until a submissive person volunteers himself to be under the dominion of another.
If they ask if you are a citizen (of any variety), you respond by saying, "What is a citizen, and how does a person become one and why would a person want or need to be one?" You do not ever deny being a citizen or claim to be any manner of citizen or claim any other manner of political status. (I can't imagine why any right thinking person would want or claim to be a State Citizen). If you claim a status, you assume the burden of proving it. You do NOT make any manner of claim!!!
The government is the entity claiming jurisdiction over you. In accordance with their rules, the claiming entity (being some manner of government entity in a criminal or civil matter; or a private entity in a civil suit), has the burden of proving political jurisdiction; first of the state government over the Wrongly Accused (to establish that the Wrongly Accused is under an obligation to conform to the statutes enacted by the state); and second (ONLY AFTER number ONE has been established!), of the court's judicial jurisdiction (that in accordance to the rules of the state, the accused is within the jurisdictional boundaries of that particular state (or federal) court.
Additionally, in response to their, "Are you a citizen question", you say, "It is not for me to establish or claim one way or the other what my status is. The moving party (government or private entity), has the burden of proving the state has gained political jurisdiction over me without violating the prohibition of involuntary servitude imbued into the Federal Constitution in the Thirteenth Amendment thereto.
As I am sure you realize Dear Group Member, I did not write all this in fifteen minutes. The reason I took the time to write all of the above is because I understand the susceptibility of the human mind to magnetic indoctrination, and, the difficulty in reprogramming a person who has been deeply adversely programmed into Paytri-Idiocy.
I hope, Dear Group Member, that you discerned on your own, that nothing I wrote herein above was any manner of my mere opinion. Everything I present is based on Natural Law If someone else informed you that 2+2=5 and I then informed you that 2+2=4, you would immediately acknowledge I was correct, nut not because you needed my evaluation or because I provided the correct information, but because your own intelligence has the ability to discern that 2+2=4, no matter that prior to my mention of it you had never before had occasion to think of it (if that were the case).
My point here is that I contend that everything, get that, everything, promulgated in the Freedom Movement is worse than worthless - it is serious Rat Poison, getting no one anywhere except in trouble!
The reason for the universal failure of Paytri-Idiot "solutions" is the failure of those involved to go to the Basic Foundation,which is the self evident fact that as everyone is born the exact same way, born with no authority over anyone, it is not reasonably possible for anyone, or any combination thereof, to properly create any manner of authority over any one who does not freely agree to conform.
What this means is that no matter what anyone comes up with about the Queen of England, or the Pope, or The Congressional Act of 1887, or Maritime Law or the bundling of birth certificates or gold fringed flags or all cap names or anything else; none of it is properly enforceable on anyone because all of it (if true), was perpetrated behind closed doors, with no manner of disclosure and no intentional voluntary submission of anyone. And, could only properly apply to those persons who intentionally and knowingly volunteered themselves into some manner of subservience to whatever entity is claiming jurisdiction over them.
Everything I present is based on these simple self evident truths. None of it is my mere opinion!!! My work is perfect in its reasoning and cannot be improved via Paytri-Idiot editing.
I do not want you, Dear group Member, or anyone else to compare my impeccable work with the excrement of others. I contend that my work stands alone in its veracity. If what you read from me raises questions, then present them to me and I will answer, but do not take my Creator Inspired documents and pervert them with Paytri-Idiot Satan laden Rat Poison.
Rat Poison is information that sounds good, has some degree of accuracy, but will cause the demise of those who eat it.
Cheers,
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
I've corresponded with the owner of the group Eric Williams for about 6 years, and applied what he's taught (free of charge) for about 4.
Eric is about 85 years old and was involved in the freedom movement since 1964.
********************************
Hi Group,
In regard to the use of my Notice and Demand by Paytri-Idiots, in conjunction with a court case. I have been in this Freedom Fight since 1964. In the beginning, not knowing any better, I accepted the teachings then prevalent among adherents. During my early years I learned most of what was then prevalent was total nonsense, non-think Paytri-Idiot Rat Poison. Unfortunately, this same nonsense is even more wide spread today than back then.
I suffered through it all until 1970, when I was prosecuted by the IRS for criminally failing to file or pay income tax. I went to Federal District Court in Los Angeles in 1970, all by myself, with absolutely no plan of defense. I had filed no documents with the Federal Prosecutor or Federal Court. I was confident my Creator would guide me safely through the battle, or not, as He determined my situation and outcome would best serve His intentions.
-----------------------------------------------------
There were only five people in the Federal courtroom - the Judge, Bailiff, Clerk, IRS Prosecutor and me.
The case was called, the Prosecutor stood and said, "Citizens of the United States have an obligation to blah, blah, blah..."", at which time I stood and said, "I object."
Federal Judge, "Why are you objecting? He hasn't said anything yet."
Me: "Well, he said citizens of the United States have all those obligations he was listing and that may be true, but he doesn't have anything in his file to put me in that class."
Judge: "Are you renouncing your citizenship?"
Me: "How can I renounce that which I never applied for?"
Judge: "Where were you born?"
Me: "At the time of my birth I had just gone through a terrible ordeal, I was gasping for breath, I could not read or write, I did not know who I was, where I was, or even what I was."
Judge: "What did your mother tell you?"
Me: "At the time of my birth I did not then understand the child mother relationship, I could not pick my mother from a lineup of one."
Judge: "What was on your birth certificate?
Me: "At the time of my birth I was not then aware of the importance of such a document. I do not know if one was created or not and I deny that any was, and" (pointing my finger at the IRS prosecutor, I said), "He can't prove it."
Judge: "I am taking this matter under consideration and you will be notified."
That was 45 years ago, and I am still waiting. I have never ever filed or paid or been bothered by the IRS.
There was no suggestion during that short criminal trial that I was not born in California. If the Fourteenth Amendment or any of those Federal laws declaring citizenship were meaningful, then why did that Federal Judge not simply declare me a citizen and continue with the prosecution?
A few years later while I was operating my own very successful and profitable furniture manufacturing company in Southern California, as I was walking out of my office early one afternoon, to get in my new Cadillac (paid for with cash), to go call on retail store customers; I was walking past a white car driving into the parking lot, the driver of the car called to me by name, he did not ask me who I was, he said, while flashing his IRS Special Agent Badge on me:"Mr. Williams, may we speak to you a moment?" I looked down into the car and the driver then said, showing me a check: "Would you please be so kind as to identify your endorsement of this check?" It was a $2,000.00 cashiers check that had been paid to me a few years prior, as partial payment for my construction of a room addition on a man's home.
I said to the driver: "You are wanting me to help you prosecute someone for not paying their income tax?" He acknowledged that was the case. I said, "I cannot believe that you would think that I would help you. I do not see the check, any endorsement nor you. Please stay out of my life and leave me alone." I then turned to my new Fleetwood Brougham deElegance Cadillac to continue on my business errands.
The point of this Dear Group, is that the IRS knew where I was, what I was doing, that I was making a ton of money (which my wife spent faster than I could get it), and that I was not filing or paying, and the IRS has never bothered me in any way.
I have mentioned this many times on my radio talk shows and otherwise such as in this writing to you.
The reason I was prosecuted in 1970 was because I had become a very outspoken leader in the anti income tax rebellion of Southern California in 1968-69. During that rebellion I had a partner who was financially very well off, who paid for the thousands of flyers that were distributed all over Southern California advertising our anti income tax meeting, with my picture printed on them, where I gave all of the meeting anti income-tax presentations.
My partner was charged with criminal violations the same as I. He went to Federal court with an attorney. He was convicted and spent 2-1/2 years in Federal prison, with a $10K fine and probation after release. His attorney did not challenge the jurisdiction of the IRS. I was the one the IRS really wanted, but they could not get me because they could not establish political jurisdiction over me!
About six months after my partner's release from prison, I was visiting him at his home, where he showed me a newspaper item recounting a casual conversation at an airport coffee shop between two tax protestors and an off duty IRS prosecutor.
During this conversation the prosecutor was asked why IRS prosecutors asked tax defendants in criminal court if they were citizens of the United States. The prosecutor said that if the defendant was not a citizen of the United states, or did not admit to it, that the IRS had no jurisdiction over that person.
What all those non-thinking persons in the Paytri-Idiot community have missed is the very important, critically important, prohibition of involuntary servitude principle established in the Thirteenth Amendment, which constitutes the codification of Natural Law into the Federal Constitution.
It matters not what you claim Dear Group Member, but making the wrong claim can cause you to lose, so then DON'T CLAIM ANYTHING!!! All that matters in a confrontation with the government is what the IRS or other government entity can prove. So keep your mouth shut and don't give them something to use against you!
In order for the government to prove anything, case law establishes that the government must have a living eyewitness to come forward and testify that the eyewitness saw and heard you claim to be a citizen of the United States, or otherwise volunteer yourself into government servitude, such as having observed you applying for a driver license. And that still would not establish jurisdiction because your responding argument and cross examination of their witness will establish that the only reason you ever complied with any of that (if you did, which you do NOT admit), was because the government had fraudulently indoctrinated you as a child, in its indoctrination centers, commonly known as public schools, to wrongly believe that you had been born into United States citizenship.
Where and when Dear Group Member, did the government ever inform you that it had no authority to require you to do anything, unless and until after you volunteered to submit yourself to its political jurisdiction?
In regard to my incident in Federal Court in 1970, pay attention to what the judge did NOT ask! He did not ask if I had a driver license, a SS# number or if I used Federal Reserve Notes to purchase my food or if I received any manner of benefit which the Paytri-Idiots claim cause adhesion contracts - all being nothing but more Paytri-Idiot BS - Rat Poison!!!
Every question the Federal Judge asked me during that aborted trial, was directly aimed at establishing my United States citizenship. The word "citizen" carries with it a self evident inherent automatic acknowledgment of political subservience to a political superior! Does it take a rocket scientist to figure that out? And how is State Citizenship any lesser of an evil? Get REAL!!!
As an aside, in regard to persons born on this land, in regard to their obligation to pay income tax: citizenship is the primary means by which the government obtains the voluntary submission of otherwise politically independent persons to be politically subservient. However, there are other means whereby the government can acquire political jurisdiction, that do not include or involve citizenship, but are none-the-less, voluntary on the part of the tax-payer.
The reason I mention all this to you Dear Group Members, is because all too many of those who have used my documents in the past, who have been wrongly indoctrinated with Paytri-Idiocy, think they are smarter than me, and have edited my very carefully worded documents in a manner that has caused them to be dismissed by the courts as frivolous.
I have a man in Illinois who has properly used a special version of my N&D to prevent eminent domain access to his property by an electrical power company that has laid out a route for its new very high voltage lethal radiation emitting power line across this man's property, and my properly served N&D has stopped the power company from access to this man's property.
The Illinois Court that handles all eminent domain cases is refusing to do anything against this man until the power company presents proof that Illinois has properly gained political jurisdiction over this man, so that Illinois would have political jurisdiction enabling Illinois to exercise its eminent domain authority over him, which the power company will never be able to present, because Illinois does not any such political jurisdiction evidence in its state files.
My wife, who I met about 2-1/2 years ago. During my explanation to her of my IRS elimination procedures, she informed me that she had at that time recently entered into an agreement with the IRS for her to make monthly payments of $600.00 to the IRS, against an agreed upon previous tax liability.
When she first mentioned this to me she then informed me that she had mailed her second $600.00 check to the IRS just two days prior.
I clarified that, "You mean day before yesterday?" She acknowledged the affirmative. Because it had been only two days it was most likely that her $600.00 check had not yet reached her bank. I then prevailed upon her to call her bank and put a stop payment order on that second $600.00 check, which she did then do.
I then created IRS letter #1, a quickie letter for her to immediately send to the IRS. During the following week or so, I created IRS letter #2 for her, which she mailed to the IRS a week or so later.
A short time after that she received a nasty threatening letter from a different IRS office. I then wrote IRS Letter #3 which she mailed to that new IRS office, including a copy of her first two letters to the original IRS office.
A couple weeks later she received a letter from the state income tax office. (I think this was instigated by the IRS). I then created a letter for her to send to that state office, enclosing a copy of all three of her letters to the IRS. It has now been well over two years and she has heard no more from the IRS or state income tax office. And, she still uses her driver license, SS#, and receives her monthly SS deposit to her same bank account the IRS had previously threatened to confiscate, and threatened to take her SS payments, and put a lien on her house. None of which has the IRS done after receiving the letters I wrote for her, similar to my N&D, challenging the IRS to prove the Federal Government had gained political jurisdiction over her in full compliance with the Thirteenth Amendment.
I had all these IRS letters and my N&D posted on my regular Yahoo whoru group so anyone could copy them down, but as I mentioned herein above, too many Paytri-Idiots were taking them and editing them with Paytri-Idiot gibberish that served no purpose other than to red flag the documents as having been edited by ignorant scoff-laws who had copied the documents off the Internet, who did not understand the Basic Irrefutable Foundation of Political Jurisdiction, as is continually evidenced by their continual blathering of their totally idiotic Paytri-Idiot BS, as I will refer to herein below.
Because of this problem of Paytri-Idiot editing of my documents, I removed my documents from my regular Yahoo Group and posted them on a members by invitation only Yahoo Group, so I have some control over how my documents will be used, with no unauthorized Paytri-Idiot editing.
------------------------------------------------------
This country was never intended to be a republic by the commoners who participated in the Founding. There is nothing in the Federal Constitution that declares the Federal Government to be a republic - it is, unfortunately, a republic, but that was not declared to be the style of the Federal Government. A republic is not a form of government desired by a people who purport to be free!!!
How are the meanings of words established? NOT by the information printed in dictionaries! The purpose of dictionaries is to print the meanings of words as such meanings are established and changed or modified by the use of words in the day to day conversations and publications of the general public, or "otherwise". "Otherwise" meaning how certain words are used by those who use those certain words, where those words are not words commonly used in the day to day conversations of the general public. Such as the word "republic". What did the word " republic" actually mean, or refer to in 1787 when the CONstitution was written?
At that time, in 1787, there had never ever been any society in the recorded history of man, designated as being a "republic", where the government was under the control of the common people, which was the purported intention of the form of government intended to be created here, by those persons who had been mere commoners under the English Monarchy.
The true and actual meaning of the word "republic" has not actually changed during the past 230 years, except in the deluded minds of wishful thinking Paytri-Idiots! And it is established in the federal CONstitution, which is why I write it with the CON at the beginning. The meaning of the word "republic", by observation of those who actually use that evil word, indicates a political society with two political classes, (1) those who make the rules, and (2), those who follow or obey those rules.
To verify that, what do we have in "The People's Republic of China", and "The Democratic Republic of [North] Korea", and the now defunct "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics", and the "Republic of Cuba" and about a hundred other totalitarian dictatorships on this planet that have the word "republic" in the official name of their country.
In our CONstitution we have the ruling class, "People of the United States", established in the Preamble and reiterated in Amendments 1(in its second clause); in 2 (citizens have ZERO gun possession rights);in 4 (citizens have no arrest warrant or privacy protection); and in 9 and 10 (citizens have no final authority under 9 and 10).
In our CONstitution we have the acknowledged future existence of citizens of the United States in Section Two of Article One, in the eligibility requirements of such citizens to serve in the House of Representatives and Senate. This subservient class was not defined until 1868, in the Fourteenth Amendment, which most certainly does NOT declare that all persons born in the United States are thereby established as being citizens thereof. Pay attention to the words!!!
No matter the clear and open access to everything I have written here in regard to the word "republic" and how the meaning of words is established, we have multiplied thousands of Paytri-Idiots clamoring to "restore the republic". How brain dead can a person be and still be breathing?
And, the Congressional Act of 1867(?), creating a municipal government for Washington D.C., This Act did not cause the Federal Government to be a corporation and did not change the Constitution. All it did was accomplish the reasonable need of creating a municipal government for the general oversight and governing of the city that had established itself around the Capital of the Federation. In that Act, CONgress retains full ultimate control of that municipal government. Go read it for yourself; I have, several times. There is nothing wrong or devious in this Act of CONgress.
All governments on this planate are corporate. The PTA and the Boy Scouts, and the local Woman's clubs are all corporate, and there is nothing wrong with that. Being corporate does not mean they are incorporated.
And birth certificates are not bundled and sold to investors; and there are no money accounts created in regard to anyone's birth; and the Queen of England does not own the United States and neither does the Pope.
Writing your name in all caps or otherwise has no significance except in the pea brains of non-thinking Paytri-Idiots.
Rescission of documents is not necessary and is counter-productive! Gold fringe on the flag has no impactive significance and the courts are not operating under maritime law. This is all Paytri-Idiot gibberish - Rat Poison!
And, ESQ is most certainly NOT an indication or designation of nobility. Esq is, under English custom, the designation assigned to a vassal or servant of a Knight. An esquire is the vassal who polishes the Knights armor, grooms the Knight's horse and generally takes care of all the Knight's personal laundry. That is, an esquire is a vassal, a person who serves others. Now, is that not what an attorney does? So then, is it not entirely appropriate that an attorney put Esq after his name? Is it not apparent that the "leaders" of the Freedom Movement in this country have not done their homework?
-----------------------------------------------------------
There is only one issue Dear Group Member, the political jurisdiction of the government over the individual. This is true because everyone is born the same way, with no birth imbued authority over anyone. Governments are created by mere men, NOT gods! The men who create government cannot reasonably imbue their creation with any more authority that the authority naturally imbued into any one single individual man or woman.
The one and only way any government can gain mandatory subservience is through the voluntary agreement of each individual to submit himself to such dominion. The Federal Thirteenth Amendment acknowledges the Natural state of every person in its prohibition of involuntary servitude. This CONstitutional provision acknowledges that no government entity in this country has authority to declare any person to be subservient.
The reason our Freedom is under such serious attack is because of the magnetic attraction of the human mind to information for which it has no frame of reference to enable it to discern whether the information is good for the person or good for the teacher, a government agent, known as a school teacher.
Immeasurable evidence of this is observable everywhere by taking notice of the multiplied billions of dollars that are spent on advertising all manner of items and services.
Rest assured, those corporations would not be spending all that money if what I wrote in the preceding paragraph was not true!
When challenging the political Jurisdiction of the government, the individual must not make any claim of his political status. Whoever is making the claim assumes the burden of proof. The Federal Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition of involuntary servitude, totally ignored by the Freedom Movement, is critically important to extricating a person from the government's flypaper!
In every single court case, no matter the issue, the primary and first issue is political jurisdiction, NOT jurisdiction of the COURT; jurisdiction of the court is secondary.
The primary issue is the political jurisdiction of the GOVERNMENT, which is operated and managed by the Executive Branch. This places the burden of proving political jurisdiction on the Executive Branch, NOT on the court!
My Notice and Demand is served on the state government, on the Executive Branch (or Fed. likewise), requiring the official representing the State's Executive Branch to present proof from the State's existing files, that the state has gained political jurisdiction over the Wrongly Accused without the State (or Fed), violating the prohibition of involuntary servitude set forth in the Federal Thirteenth Amendment.
The court HAS NO STANDING to interact in the examination, establishment or determination of the political jurisdiction of the Executive Branch over the Wrongly Accused.
Once a challenge to political jurisdiction is asserted (served upon the States or authority claiming entity), no further action or proceedings of any manner can take place until proof of political jurisdiction is presented on the record!!! This is in accord with 45 appellate case citations that I include in Exhibit "A" to my Notice and Demand.
The problem with my N&D is its unquestionable POWER!!! It confronts the State with an issue that the State cannot win and dares not lose. It removes all government authority over the challenging person. In truth, my N&D establishes that the government never ever had proper political jurisdiction over anyone!!!
However, the judges are well schooled in their trickery, and are well aware that the vast majority of persons that present any manner of challenging documents, most likely copied them off the Internet and do not properly understand the content, and can easily be tricked because they will answer seemingly innocent questions, such as "State your name for the record", which, if complied with, will cause any N&D of mine to be negated, and the silly ignorant victim will claim my N&D does not work.
If you, for some unimagined reason, must present yourself in court, and you are called upon to state your name for the record, you should have a copy of the birth certificate with the name you have been led to believe and think is yours (but is NOT), entered thereon, so when the court asks you to state "your name" for the record, you stand up and, while holding the rolled up BC in your hand, extended out fully to the court, you say, "This here in my hand is the John Smith that you are concerned with; I am here to speak for him".
If they ask you who you are, you say, "It matters not who I am, but for the record, I am simply me."
If they ask you your name, you say, "What is a name and how does a person get one? And why would a person need or want one? It matters not who I am, however, I am simply me. It is my understanding that you are concerned with John Smith, I am here to speak for John Smith who I hold here in my hand."
If they ask you what it is that you hold in your hand, you say,"I hold here in my hand the John Smith that you are concerned with; for the answer to your question, you can determine that for yourself by looking hereon.", while you are extending the BC out to the court in your hand. You do not ever say that the document is a birth certificate.
It is important Dear Group Member, to understand that no one on this planet has any jurisdiction over anyone else, unless and until a submissive person volunteers himself to be under the dominion of another.
If they ask if you are a citizen (of any variety), you respond by saying, "What is a citizen, and how does a person become one and why would a person want or need to be one?" You do not ever deny being a citizen or claim to be any manner of citizen or claim any other manner of political status. (I can't imagine why any right thinking person would want or claim to be a State Citizen). If you claim a status, you assume the burden of proving it. You do NOT make any manner of claim!!!
The government is the entity claiming jurisdiction over you. In accordance with their rules, the claiming entity (being some manner of government entity in a criminal or civil matter; or a private entity in a civil suit), has the burden of proving political jurisdiction; first of the state government over the Wrongly Accused (to establish that the Wrongly Accused is under an obligation to conform to the statutes enacted by the state); and second (ONLY AFTER number ONE has been established!), of the court's judicial jurisdiction (that in accordance to the rules of the state, the accused is within the jurisdictional boundaries of that particular state (or federal) court.
Additionally, in response to their, "Are you a citizen question", you say, "It is not for me to establish or claim one way or the other what my status is. The moving party (government or private entity), has the burden of proving the state has gained political jurisdiction over me without violating the prohibition of involuntary servitude imbued into the Federal Constitution in the Thirteenth Amendment thereto.
As I am sure you realize Dear Group Member, I did not write all this in fifteen minutes. The reason I took the time to write all of the above is because I understand the susceptibility of the human mind to magnetic indoctrination, and, the difficulty in reprogramming a person who has been deeply adversely programmed into Paytri-Idiocy.
I hope, Dear Group Member, that you discerned on your own, that nothing I wrote herein above was any manner of my mere opinion. Everything I present is based on Natural Law If someone else informed you that 2+2=5 and I then informed you that 2+2=4, you would immediately acknowledge I was correct, nut not because you needed my evaluation or because I provided the correct information, but because your own intelligence has the ability to discern that 2+2=4, no matter that prior to my mention of it you had never before had occasion to think of it (if that were the case).
My point here is that I contend that everything, get that, everything, promulgated in the Freedom Movement is worse than worthless - it is serious Rat Poison, getting no one anywhere except in trouble!
The reason for the universal failure of Paytri-Idiot "solutions" is the failure of those involved to go to the Basic Foundation,which is the self evident fact that as everyone is born the exact same way, born with no authority over anyone, it is not reasonably possible for anyone, or any combination thereof, to properly create any manner of authority over any one who does not freely agree to conform.
What this means is that no matter what anyone comes up with about the Queen of England, or the Pope, or The Congressional Act of 1887, or Maritime Law or the bundling of birth certificates or gold fringed flags or all cap names or anything else; none of it is properly enforceable on anyone because all of it (if true), was perpetrated behind closed doors, with no manner of disclosure and no intentional voluntary submission of anyone. And, could only properly apply to those persons who intentionally and knowingly volunteered themselves into some manner of subservience to whatever entity is claiming jurisdiction over them.
Everything I present is based on these simple self evident truths. None of it is my mere opinion!!! My work is perfect in its reasoning and cannot be improved via Paytri-Idiot editing.
I do not want you, Dear group Member, or anyone else to compare my impeccable work with the excrement of others. I contend that my work stands alone in its veracity. If what you read from me raises questions, then present them to me and I will answer, but do not take my Creator Inspired documents and pervert them with Paytri-Idiot Satan laden Rat Poison.
Rat Poison is information that sounds good, has some degree of accuracy, but will cause the demise of those who eat it.
Cheers,
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone