[Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

The most numerous and, collectively, the most powerful form of government on earth is the family. This is why worldly governments are so obsessed with destroying and undermining families.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

BILLS MUST PASS BOTH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PLUS THE SENATE WHICH EQUALS CONGRESS, CONGRESSIONAL LAW PASSING THE SAME BILL BY MAJORITY VOTE~ eh

TO THE BEST OF MY INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, AND BELIEFS
LEGISLATION THAT WOULD HAVE TRULY CORRECTED UNDUE INTRUSION INTO PEOPLE'S PERSONAL LIVES, INJECTING THE GOVERNMENT TOO DEEPLY INTO DOMESTIC RELATIONS NEVER PASSED; THAT IS UNTIL THE CONGRESSIONAL PASSING INTO LAW THE UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT LEGISLATION OF 2008.

Michan's local law MCL 552.604(3)(b) and UIFSA's law and process apply to the "one-order world forum" UIFSA's 701(6)(A)(i) "INCLUSION MECHANISM" IN THE UNITED STATES 'CONSENTS OF RECORD' IN THE ISSUING STATE COURT CONTINUING, EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION MCL 552.2101 and MCL 552.2205 among others is that [RECORD MECHANISM] [UIFSA RECORD CRITERIA] INDIVIDUAL [LIBERTY] CASE-BY-CASE FIX REGARDLESS OF FAMILY WEALTH! Also see Official Comment to Section 710, Unif. Interstate Family Support Act 2008, vide page 122/127 or [115].

Michigan's
Gerald R. Ford, 38th President of the United States
Statement on Signing a Bill Amending Child Support Provisions of the Social Security Act
"When I approved the legislation establishing the new child support program last January, I expressed my strong backing of its objectives. I reaffirm that support now. However, at that time I also stated that some of the program's provisions inject the Federal Government too deeply into domestic relations and that others raise serious privacy and administrative issues...

...Legislation which would have corrected these problems was recently passed by the House of Representatives, but these corrective amendments were not included in the bill I have just signed. I urge the Congress to enact such legislation as soon as possible after the current recess, so the desirable objectives of the child support program are not undermined by undue intrusion of the Federal Government into people's personal lives."


.


"Let us look closely at this child support "assignment of rights to the state" and/or should we be saying let us look closely at these child support assignment(s) of rights to the state, and how that 'assignment' function flows like currency..."

Image
Assignment of Rights Agreement: Everything You Need to Know


Establishing a Support Order

LOCAL LAW, In Michigan MCL 552.604(3)(B), MCL 552.2205; Public Law 104-193-Aug. 22, 1996 Subtitle C—Streamlining and Uniformity of Procedures Sec. 321. ADOPTION OF UNIFORM STATE LAWS Section 466 (42 U.S.C. 666) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: "(f) UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT.—IN ORDER TO SATISFY SECTION 454(20)(A), on and after January 1, 1998, each State must have in effect the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act..." — FOR A VALID "SUPPORT ORDER" TO ENSUE.

UIFSA provides that the procedures and law of the form apply, STRICK UIFSA § 701(6) RECORD CRITERIA — UIFSA § 701(6)(a)(I) FOR A VALID "FOREIGN SUPPORT ORDER" TO ENSUE

The "SUPPORT ORDER" [AT HOME] & [ABROAD] "Outside this State" a "FOREIGN SUPPORT ORDER" and are the same 'thing'—obligation in interstate commerce owed to the State [collection and disbursement unit] in the country of origin.
Image
INTAKE

A case record must be established
● To open a friend of the court case an executed assignment of support rights or non-AFDC application.
Preparation of an accurate and complete case record is important to the child support enforcement process. Later action on the case often depends on information collected at this point in the processing sequence. A well-prepared case establishes a verifiable audit trail.
.
Image
Here we go this is what we are told...

From the common a-turn-against-ye, public-pretender, prostitutor, jail-house lawyers, legal whores, etc. to the child support industry guru - and even over to the patriotic family/child rights activists OK - alike, everyone is making money [except numero uno] - and all with each his good intentions aside the general population truly don't know the [assignment] breakdown or how it's function flows like [contractual] currency!!!

The General Misconception leads to remedial sales that talks in circles sometimes without ever saying anything truly useful and or practical... most of the info is agreeable but then in my mind [testing a contract] 'it gets snagged' like a flag on the play... researching for something better [research and development skills] for a clearer more sound [contractually sound & binding] remedial truth who's assignment binding who, when, and where and for how long, where does the money flow; those obligations/things.

LEGISLATED LAWS & RULES BETTER CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE
THE ASSIGNMENT BREAKDOWN FOR ALL TO SIMPLY KNOW THE 'TRUTH'

Please, respect only meant to "The Child Support & Fatherless Crisis Hustle" group or anyone else for all the hard work true sincerity, and effort they put forth in helping others. The general misconception [discribed above] many many are confused, not quite clear, and or know nothing about that assignment 'thing' obligation to the state and who it does and/or does not bind, people simply do not know. This next video 'Produced by "The Child Support Hustle"' is an educational example and lays out the groundwork of that little bugger of a welfare ~ assignment ~ yet has that element of 'assignment-misconception' described in general above - so watching the content of the next video which "I agree in part and disagree in part". I believe myself and 'The Child Suppor Hustle' group to be in good standing and have specifically chosen them as a lead intro into and/or for my document images as correlated below - regarding the breakdown of the assignment. Together (this video and my document images) will show, hopefully, a clearer more in-depth micro breakdown of what is taking place, possibly giving our audiences a new more sound peaceful [in respect to liberty] "thought model" on the child support assignment of rights to the state. So without any further ado...

To All Sundry by these Presents!
WHY ONE PARENT'S WELFARE ASSIGNMENT 'PRIVITY' IS NOT LEGALLY CONTRACTUALLY BINDING UPON THE OTHER PARENT WITH NEW UNIFORM CASE RECORD RULES CHILD SUPPORT IS EVIDENCE-BASED AND VOLUNTARY!!!

.
Image Get some more coffee or popcorn this little diddy takes a bit. Image CHILD SUPPORT-MANDATORY VS VOLUNTARY !THE BREAKDOWN! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8mS9j1mGUc ImageImageImage
Image
ImageImage
Image
Image
This video talks about the custodial parent's 'currently charging support' assignment [required to receive welfare] this agreement [between Welfare and Recipent] does not bind the third party [the other parent] to an obligation! In this video that welfare assignment only applies to the welfare recipient and nobody else and is not what binds the custodial parent period!!!

[Study, Learn, and Share]
Image ● "Unless 1 of the parties is required to participate in the title IV-D support program..."
In reference to government welfare's and their recipient's written agreement as a legal process of law legally binding child support 'assignment of rights to the State' 45 USC § 302.50(a).

● "They may choose not to have the office of the friend of the court administer and enforce obligations..."
Obligations are "formal, binding agreements" only binding on obligors- one who has undertaken an obligation; a promisor, or a debtor.

● "That may be imposed in the domestic relations matter."
In reference to this is the concrete case establishing the record in the issuing state's court continuing, exclusive jurisdiction bound by uniform laws stream-lined processes and procedures of UIFSA's strict record criteria under the State Plan for a valid-support order to ensue. Again, the obligor party's written "parties' agreement" "support agreement" is a prerequisite; and then after court consideration, if that private child "support agreement" is endorsed by the court it will be placed in the record and enforced as a: judgment, decree, or order those meeting strict UIFSA 701(6) criteria, MCl 552.604(3)(b), 45 USC § 302.50(a)(2) other legal process as established by State laws, such as a legally enforceable and binding agreement. Meeting strict UIFSA RECORD CRITERIA IS THE ONLY WAY OBLIGATIONS MAY BE IMPOSED [RECOGNIZED AND ENFORCEABLE WITHIN THE NEW UNIFORM CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM (FCR DATABASE) (STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT)] since welfare reform legislation and UIFSA legislation passed.

Though the statute is written ambiguously with each bulleted above intended for either parent and/or party the description of each bullet describes and or illustrates two distinctly different assignments of rights to the state:

(1) assignment, the first bullet binding only on the welfare state & recipient it's their agreement.

(2) assignment, the third bullet binding only on the obligor and the party/parties with the other party/parties as the obligee/s, this is the "parties' agreement" assignment into subject-matter jurisdiction [Government for the people by the people] [a constitutionally limited government] [limited by we the people US Cons. 10th Amen.] [individual liberty and equal justice under the law] [at arms-length] [OR by consent].


CENTRALIZED COLLECTION AND DISBURSEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS
Without the family wealth or financial consideration, all assignment [cash flow] obligations are to the state.
Congress requires States to process child support payments through centralized State Disbursement Units, source Office of Inspector General.
PUBLIC LAW 104–193—AUG. 22, 1996 Stream-lined Uniform Procedures and [RECORD] Processes.
MCL 600.2538

Image To be eligible for assistance programs, you must provide information to collect child support from him -- going to repay the state for your assistance grant.

Semper sexus masculinus etiam faemini-num continet.
The masculine gender always includes the feminine as well. Dig. 32.63.

Image 5.15 Assignment of Support (Certification/Decertification)
[Certification/Decertification]
The following paragraphs [not shown here] briefly discuss the various MDHHS) IV-D referable public assistance programs as they relate to the child support program. MDHHS assistance programs are referable to IV-D when the need to cooperate with child support services exists.
Image Families who receive CDC and FAP do have a requirement to cooperate in establishing a support order, or enforcing an existing order unless there is a good cause. Subsection 1.1 of this manual section, federal law requires that families receiving TANF-funded benefits must assign their right to support. If the family is receiving both FIP and non-FIP benefits, the family is required to assign the support to the state, but only because of the receipt of FIP benefits.

SO EVERYONE IS ON THE "SAME PAGE" "WAVELENGTH" AND/OR "MINDSET" FOR THE MOST PART THE INFORMATION ABOVE IS MOSTLY CORRECT; THESE ILLUSTRATIONS THUS FAR ABOVE ILLUSTRATE THE FIRST BULLETED ASSIGNMENT OUTLINED IN DETAIL ABOVE - REQUIRED to RECEIVE WELFARE BENEFITS; AND IS ONE CHILD SUPPORT ASSIGNMENT [A PIGGY-BACK ASSIGNMENT TO THE CONCRETE CASE ASSIGNMENT - both bulleted assignments outlined above and below derives from U.S. Code Title 45 § 302.50.

● "Unless 1 of the parties is required to participate in the title IV-D support program..."
In reference to government welfares' and their recipient's written agreement as a legal process of law legally binding child support 'assignment of rights to the State' 45 USC § 302.50(a).

● "They may choose not to have the office of the friend of the court administer and enforce obligations..."
Obligations are "formal, binding agreements" only binding on obligors- one who has undertaken an obligation; a promisor, or a debtor.

● "That may be imposed in the domestic relations matter."

(1) assignment, the first bullet binding only on the welfare state & recipient it's their agreement.

(2) assignment, the third bullet binding only on the obligor and the party/parties it's their agreement.

THESE ASSIGNMENTS HAVE NO PRIVITY TO EACH OTHER CONTRACTUALLY
Privity— is a relation between two parties that is recognized by law, such as that of blood, lease, or service.

All assignments [cash flow] obligations are to the state.

There is no law that requires any one man or woman to participate in a child support period!
How it works...

There is an assignment required by the obligor party in the concrete civil case U.S. Code Title 45 § 302.50, MCL 552.604(3)(b), UIFSA 701(6)(A)(i) — is this much agreed?

THESE ASSIGNMENTS HAVE NO PRIVITY TO EACH OTHER UNLESS A PARTY IS IN FACT PARTY TO BOTH
(2) ASSIGNMENTS BOTH U.S. CODE TITLE 45 [WHICH GOVERNS TITLE IV-D CHILD SUPPORT] SECTION 302.50.
Image PAID BY THE OBLIGATED PARENT
ADJUDICATION— THE ENTRY OF [ASSIGNMENT OF SUPPORT RIGHTS AND,] A JUDGMENT, DECREE, OR ORDER BASED ON THE EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIES FOR A VALID SUPPORT ORDER PAID BY THE OBLIGATED PARENT; WELFARE CASES BOTH PARENTS OBLIGATED VIA PIGGY BACK ASSIGNMENT IN ORDER TO meet CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER OF BOTH PARENTS VIA CONSENT-AUTHORIZING-APPROPRIATIONS UNDER TITLE IV-D TO ACTIVATE THE DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT TO CHANGE THE ASSIGNMENT [CASH FLOW].

THE DOUBLE ASSIGNMENT IS TO INSURE THE CONSENT OF BOTH PARENTS [CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER] ESPECIALLY IF THE WELFARE RECIPIENT IS NOT A PARTY TO THE TITLE IV-D CASE; IF THE WELFARE RECIPIENT IS ALSO A PARTY TO THE ASSIGNMENT IN THE CONCRETE CASE ALONG WITH THE STATE THEN ESSENTIALLY THEY HAVE CONSENTED TWICE AND THE ORIGINAL CONCRETE CASE OBLIGOR ONCE.

What Is Privity?
Privity is a doctrine of contract law that says contracts are only binding on the parties to a contract and that no third party can enforce the contract or be sued under it. Lack of privity exists when parties have no contractual obligation to one another, thereby eliminating obligations, liabilities, and access to certain rights.

What Is Privity of Contract?
Privity of contract is a doctrine of contract law that states that contracts should not give rights or obligations to entities other than those who are parties to the contract.

Rule of Privity of Contract: Everything You Need to Know

Unintended, non-signatory, third-parties can neither enforce the contract nor be sued under it. The parties to the contract are said to be "in privity of contract".


BEHOLD THE ASSIGNMENT BREAKDOWN AS THEY FLOW LIKE [CONTRACT] CURRENCY AND ORIGINATING FROM THE CONCRETE CASE'S WELFARE TITLE IV PART D — AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS — ASSIGNMENT — FOR A VALID CHILD SUPPORT ORDER TO ENSUE AND PURSUE THOSE OBLIGATIONS WITHIN THE NEW WORLDWIDE DISBURSEMENT UNIT DELIVERY SERVICE ONE ORDER WORLD RECORD DATABASE SINCE THE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICE MISSION EXPANDED AND WELFARE WAS REFORMED CONTRACTUAL VOLUNTARY ENFORCEMENT

"An assignment is a transfer or setting over of property, or of some right or interest therein, from one person to another, the term denoting not only the act of transfer, but also the instrument by which it is effected." (Burrill on Assignments [6th Ed.] sec. 1.) NOBLE v. FT. SMITH WHOLESALE GROCERY CO.

BUT ALSO THE INSTRUMENT [PARTIES AGREEMENT] BY WHICH IT [CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION] IS EFFECTED

What has emerged (effected means emerged); effected means brought into being. Effected is a past tense verb that means brought about or achieved. When something has been effected, it's been brought about. If you're responsible for the instrument by which it is effected, you've made it happen.

Image
SHOWING THIS AGAIN [ONE MORE TIME]
Image Image Assignment Limitations
The amount of support the state may retain is limited to the amount of FIP grant the family has ever received, or the amount of assigned court-ordered support, whichever is less. This limitation ensures that the amount of money the state retains never exceeds the court-ordered obligation amount, and never exceeds the URG.

(1) assignment, the first bullet binding only on the welfare state & recipient it's their agreement.
(2) assignment, the third bullet binding only on the obligor and the party/parties it's their agreement.
THESE ASSIGNMENTS ONE MAY BE PROCURED PRIOR TO THE OTHER AND VISA VERSA THE KEY IS THE CASH FLOWS TO THE STATE COLLECTION AND DISBURSEMENT UNIT.

The limit on the amount the state may retain for the care of children is limed to the welfare amount the family has ever received, so if there is no welfare and or there never has been welfare then the state cannot retain the cash flow and the charging obligation is then passed-through to the custodial parent on account of the child[ren] the original issuing assignment is not changed.

Image For economically appropriate child support awards, and for child support guidelines to pass constitutional muster. It is economically inappropriate and unjust to apply a welfare case guideline to non-welfare cases. From a critical examination, all laws must meet constitutional muster meaning there is an invisible line. Everything below the line is unconstitutional, everything above is constitutional.

Image One of the conditions for receiving the FIP (TANF) grant requires FIP recipients to assign to the state their rights to support, the receipt of FIP triggers the assignment of currently charging support. The support due from the non-custodial parent while the family is receiving FIP is assigned to the state to reimburse the state for the FIP grant the family received. 42 United States Code (USC) 608(a)(3).
The Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005 changes assignment to assign...

Image

CHANGES ASSIGNMENT WHEN A FAMILY BEGINS RECEIVING ASSISTANCE
Image 42 USC 608(a)(3), MCL 552.454(2), and MCL 722.718

(1) 'currently charging support' assignment, assigns current support obligations owed the custodial parent back to the state while receiving welfare - the first bullet binding only on the welfare state & recipient it's their agreement.
(2) 'original obligation support' assignment, giving way to current support obligations the original [non-custodial] assignment obligor's compromise on personal jurisdiction [support agreement subject-matter jurisdiction] the third bullet binding only on the obligor and the other party/parties it's their agreement.

As illustrated above, limits on the amount the state may retain for the care of children are limed to the welfare amount the family has ever received. But if and when there is welfare paid to the dependent family then the state can retain the cash flow from the original establishing assignment in the concrete case that was being pass-through to the custodial parent.

See (2) assignment illustrated above;
Is changed from being passe-through to the custodial parent back to being retained by the state [triggers the Deficit Reduction Act] to cover the family's welfare grant expenditures!

See (1) assignment illustrated above;
The receipt of FIP triggers the 'currently charging support assignment' binding between the state and the non-custodial parent [the custodial parent is not the original obligor established on the one-order-world UIFSA 701(6) record account [recorded account] (the support due from the non-custodial parent) on the account of their shard child[ren].

Thes two separate distinctive assignments are the "original obligation support assignment" creating "their [custodial] rights to support" and contingent on the original obligor as a binding prerequisite for the "currently charging support assignment" to have an effect [to be activated] and/or change the direction of the cash flowing back to the tax-payer coffers [HENCE PIGGYBACK ASSIGNMENT] ... for more explanation see ANSWER REPLY TO A FACEBOOK GROUP MEMBER'S QUESTION, vide the second to last paragraph eh.

Image

Image

Image

Moral duties are not binding -- don't be that N I C E (adj.) guy!


Image

Image

Party- The person asking for support and the person paying support. Parties are often a child's parents. A court may recognize other people and agencies as parties to a case [party- the state that asks a court to issue an order].


Image

At the time [The Role of Custodial Parents in the IV-D child Support Process] this document image was written [Before UIFSA of 2008] "parties" term was never defined! But since then they are defined under UIFSA, as are support order and a few other keywords meanings and phrases.

What this writing clearly does is illustrate without a doubt that "an individual who applies for or receives IV-D services is not necessarily considered a party to the case! They are not the obligor on account obligated to the original obligation to the state. So the "currently charging support assignment" caused to happen by the parent party who is not the Obligor originally liable prior to FIP grant receipt [is not the obligor who agreed to the parties' agreement in the concrete case] in conformity to strict UIFSA 701(6) record criteria in the issuing state and enforceable as a judgment in the country of origin.


Image

If there is an assignment of support to the state, the state must be a party to the written agreement [uniform laws, uniform processes, and uniform procedures in all UIFSA states, which is every state in the United States of America].


Image

A tribunal may be a party to the dispute...


Image

Image

Image

Ending the Redirection of Support
The child's living arrangement is AWOL [run away, missing, abducted, child-trafficking, etc.]
The child's living arrangement is Parental Home
Case Closed (termination of county court jurisdiction)


Image

Funds for the care of children by agreement - Voluntary Authorization of Appropriations
The obligor's authorizing 'charge of a child' - an assignment of support rights by the payer party's parties' agreement of record in the issuing state's concrete case!!!


Michigan Court Rules Chapter 3. Special Proceedings and Actions
Rule 3.208(D) - Friend of the Court

Who's the case is it? Without an obligator's payer's parties' agreement of record meeting UIFSA's strict record criteria clearly, it's the Friend of the Court's [worthless] case [frivolous (not having any value) a claim from which relief cannot be granted].

Image


Title 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
Chapter 7 - SOCIAL SECURITY
Subchapter IV - GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD WELFARE SERVICES
Part D - CHILD SUPPORT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PATERNITY

Image


MAKING AND MEETING OBJECTIONS!

Don't forget this bad boy...
:D


Title 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
Chapter 7 - SOCIAL SECURITY
Subchapter IV - GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD WELFARE SERVICES
Part D - CHILD SUPPORT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PATERNITY
42 U.S. Code § 1301 - Definitions

Image

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as authorizing DHHS any Federal official, TITLE IV-D/CPS agent, or representative, in carrying out any of the provisions of this welfare chapter [Title IV Part D], to take charge of any child over the objection of either of the parents of such child...

SEE THE WELFARE COURT RECORD COMPLIANCE AUDITS AND COURT FINANCIAL AUDITS


VOLUNTARY CHILD SUPPORT!!! [BY AGREEMENT]
VOLUNTARY CHILD SUPPORT REGARDLESS OF FAMILY WEALTH AND/OR THE FAMILY FINANCIAL SITUATION.

[Keep rubbing your eyes and reread it!]

Image


[SHOOTING DOWN THE MANDATORY - WELFARE ASSIGNMENTS WITHOUT OBLIGOR'S WRITTEN AGREEMENT]


Image
Last edited by Brick Layer on Fri Aug 19, 2022 3:26 pm, edited 57 times in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

But wait!

There's more... Lol



Image



[HERE WILL BE (THE POSTER CHILD) WAYNE ALAN'S CASE CASE DOCUMENTS]

Work in progress please be patient this is good and well worth waiting for this tight - treasure trove of knowledge!

[promise]
Last edited by Brick Layer on Thu Aug 18, 2022 12:43 am, edited 7 times in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

But wait!

There's more... Lol


Image



[HERE WILL BE ADDED MORE ON JURISDICTION]
[AS WELL AS THE NEXT POST TOO BUT MORE IN-DEPTH WITH BLESSING VS FREESTONE]

Work in progress please be patient this is good and well worth waiting for this tight - treasure trove of knowledge!

[promise]
Last edited by Brick Layer on Thu Aug 18, 2022 12:39 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

FROM OLE' US Message Board Thread Post
Image
Image Image Image
Image

Blessing v. Freestone and Leon Koziol Image
"...contemporary civil rights issues."

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme- ... 0/329.html
Title IV-D contains no private remedy--either judicial or administrative--through which aggrieved persons can seek redress. The only way that Title IV-D assures that States live up to their child support plans is through the Secretary's oversight, but the Secretary's limited powers to audit and cut federal funding are not comprehensive enough to foreclose §1983 liability. Pp. 15-18.
https://www.docketbird.com/court-docume ... 1361-00008
Last edited by Brick Layer on Thu Aug 18, 2022 12:54 am, edited 3 times in total.
MarcoRizer
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:34 am

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by MarcoRizer »

justincredible1984 wrote: Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:30 am Has any Man in this forum presented them selvs sui juris in there divorce? Any sucesses? I need help. I have spent the last 8 months on studing all this stuff and I would like some feed back and bounce some ideas off of each other. Thanks
I would just say i did and it was a bad idea.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

Cleaning it up...

Work in progress please be patient this is good and well worth waiting for this tight - treasure trove of knowledge!

[promise]
Last edited by Brick Layer on Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

Cleaning it up...

Work in progress please be patient this is good and well worth waiting for this tight - treasure trove of knowledge!

[promise]
Post Reply