Trained clinical trial auditor with over 15 years experience in clinical research, Brook Jackson, exposes that the COVID vaccine Pfizer trial conducted by Ventavia was a complete mess.
After she filed a complaint with the FDA, on 25 September 2020, she was fired the same day.
for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.
(...)
vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants.
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firestarter wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:54 pmThe "reputable" New England Journal of Medicine reported that 104 of 827 pregnant women experienced spontaneous abortions (roughly 1 out of 8!).
The following scientific-looking paper exposes that the claims that the COVID sterilisation vaccines don't cause spontaneous abortions is nothing but a lie (they use different words to explain this though).
In reality the COVID vaccines increase the risk of abortions 7–8 times.
.
Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results (p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period. In light of these findings, key policy decisions have been made using unreliable and questionable data. We conclude that the claims made using these data on the safety of exposure of women in early pregnancy to mRNA-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are unwarranted.
(...)
However, closer inspection of the 827 women in the denominator of this calculation reveals that between 700 to 713 women were exposed to the vaccine after the timeframe for recording the outcome had elapsed (up to 20 weeks of pregnancy). Hence, a re-analysis of these figures indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results.
(...)
A high baseline rate of 26% was used for the historical comparison of spontaneous abortion risk, an estimate that includes clinically unrecognized pregnancies and differs substantially from the definition used in this study (clinically recognized pregnancies).[5] Comparable estimates of clinically recognized pregnancies, range from 8% to 15%.
(...)
The study indicates that at least 81.9% (≥ 104/127) experienced spontaneous abortion following mRNA exposure before 20 weeks, and 92.3% (96/104) of spontaneous abortions occurred before 13 weeks’ gestation (Table 4, footnotes).[4]
This is a very high proportion of pregnancy loss observed in those exposed to the mRNA vaccination before 20 weeks’ gestation, ranging from 81.9–91.2% (n = 114–127), which is significantly different to baseline estimates from other studies (11.3%, n = 79,978 [6]; p < 0.001), being 7- to 8-fold higher than expected (p < 0.001).
.
A.R. Brock, S. Thornley -
Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy (November 2021):
https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3a ... 384dd4.pdf
(
https://web.archive.org/web/20211103025 ... 384dd4.pdf)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The US FDA emergency approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for children aged between 5 to 11 years old on 29 October 2021.
It has been claimed through/by our wonderful media that myocarditis (that causes heart attacks) is a very, very rare adverse effect of the experimental COVID vaccines. Now that Pfizer changes the content for its vaccine for 5-11 year olds is strange, but maybe possibly there are some good reasons to do so.
Pfizer describes the change to the vaccine as:
To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.
Tromethamine is a blood acid reducer used to stabilise people with heart attacks.
Its known adverse effects include: Respiratory depression; local irritation; tissue inflammation; injection site infection;
febrile response; chemical phlebitis; venospasm (vein spasms); hypervolemia; thrombosis;
extravasation (with possible necrosis and sloughing of tissues); transient decreases in blood glucose concentrations; hypoglycemia; Hepatic Necrosis with infusion via low-lying umbilical venous catheters.
According to Toby Rogers we cannot possibly believe in the reliabilty of the Pfizer vaccine trial, because “
if the rate of particular adverse outcome in kids as a result of the vaccine is 1 in 5,000 and the trial only enrols 1,518 in the treatment group then it is unlikely to spot this particular harm in the clinical trial":
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/01/pfizer- ... t-attacks/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queen Elizabeth's government proposed the Online Safety Bill, which includes criminalisation of anybody who posts “knowingly false information” and/or "communication" that will "likely" cause "psychological harm", with those convicted facing 2 years in prison.
It also gives the authorities the possibility to impose hefty fines of billions of dollars (?).
British MP David Davis got some publicity by calling the bill, which essentially gives the authorities carte blanche to remove posts that contradict the official narrative, “catastrophic” for freedom of speech.
David Kurten explained that “
the trouble with criminalising nebulous concepts like ‘psychological harm’ is that anybody can allege a criminal offence for just about anything”. Kurten continued (isn't the UK already a prime example of a totalitarian police state?):
Even more insidiously, the government is likely to become the arbiter of what is ‘knowingly false information’ and will require police forces to lock people up for ‘spreading’ it.
If this Orwellian bill becomes an act, such citizens are likely to face criminal charges and prison sentences for speaking the truth. It should be binned before the U.K. turns into a totalitarian police state.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-u ... two-years/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can remember that in May 2020, when the first draconian lockdown was a little eased, I said that around November with rising flu and common cold cases the lockdown will be reinstated in all glory. It took until December 2020 that not only the bars restaurants but most "non-essential" shops were effectively closed (I couldn't even buy clothes!).
So now, with in October reported COVID cases and hospitalisations going up (as was expected!), we get another brutal lockdown in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Without vaccination passport nobody is allowed any form of recreational activity (including indoor sports).
On top of that, starting on Friday everybody is obligated to once again wear a mask that increases the chance of respiratory diseases, and of course social distancing (of 1.5 meter). They also want to mandate the vaccination passports at universities, as young people have more to fear from the deadly COVID vaccines than the virus.
In December people older than 80 have to get the COVID booster shots to keep their vaccination passport (in Dutch):
https://www.nu.nl/coronavirus/6165605/o ... maakt.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some conspiracy theorists have noted that the plot for the 1981 movie "Early warning" is eerily similar to the COVID pandemic, lockdown, Great Reset. There is also a Christian theme in the movie...
Part of the scheme is a one world monetary system that can block people from buying (food). Some minor resistance is expected but hunger will fix this.
With the result the One world government that nobody can oppose.
https://youtu.be/aMz8kzAwWAE
(Full movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VItItJY6Hp0)