Stephen Kohn, the whistleblower who leaked the report, has since been suspended from duty.
Interior Minister Horst Seehofer, who is in charge of the ministry that drafted the report, had this to say about the report:
If you start analyzing papers like that, then pretty soon you’ll be inviting the guys with the tin foil hats to parliamentary hearings.
See some excerpts from the following story on this draft report (unfortunately the full report is in German).
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/ ... lse-alarm/• The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.
• A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News.
More people are dying because of state-imposed Corona-measures than they are being killed by the virus.
The reason is a scandal in the making:
A Corona-focused German healthcare system is postponing life-saving surgery and delaying or reducing treatment for non-Corona patients.
“Therapeutic and preventive measures should never bring more harm than the illness itself. Their aim should be to protect the risk groups, without endegearing the availibilty of medical care and the health of the whole population, as it is unfortunately occurring”
“We in the scientific and medical praxis are experiencing the secondary damages of the Corona-measures on our patients on a dialy basis.”
On 13 May 2020, a “scientific” looking report was published that shows that 2/3 of the excess deaths in England and Wales was NOT caused by COVID-19. This suggests that 20,000 deaths (of the 30,000 excess deaths) were caused by the draconian lockdown measures.
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1931David Spiegelhalter, chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication at the University of Cambridge, said that Covid-19 did not explain the high number of deaths taking place in the community.
At a briefing hosted by the Science Media Centre on May 12 he explained that, over the past five weeks, care homes and other community settings had had to deal with a ‘staggering burden’ of 30,000 more deaths than would normally be expected, as patients were moved out of hospitals that were anticipating high demand for beds.
Of those 30,000, only 10 000 have had Covid-19 specified on the death certificate. While Spiegelhalter acknowledged that some of these ‘excess deaths’ might be the result of underdiagnosis, ‘the huge number of unexplained extra deaths in homes and care homes is extraordinary. When we look back . . . this rise in non-covid extra deaths outside the hospital is something I hope will be given really severe attention.’ He added that many of these deaths would be among people ‘who may well have lived longer if they had managed to get to hospital.’
The following report shows that immunity from prosecution for care homes in the USA is associated with more “COVID-19 fatalities”.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4cnp9drx3vf17 ... l.pdf?dl=0This report draws a strong association between nursing home fatalities, corporate ownership, and immunity from prosecution and third-party lawsuits.The data shows that 77 percent of total deaths come from states that gave immunity to corporations who owned nursing homes and healthcare facilities; moreover, 76 percent of total nursing home deaths come from states that have legal immunity status for these facilities.
•Legal immunity facing the COVID-19 apex kills: As of May 10, 2020, 62,031 deaths out of 80,796 total deaths come from states with some variation of corporate immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic.
•Of the ten states with the highest fatality rates, eight have corporate immunity and represent 93 percent of all fatalities, or 63,187 deaths. New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Michigan, Pennsylvania,Illinois, Connecticut, and Louisiana rank at the top of case fatalities.
•By calculating the average deaths per facility with fatalities by state(absolute number of NH deaths/number of NH facilities with fatalities), once again, New York and NewJersey lead in first and second place, with 12.6 and 9.2 average deaths per facility ,respectively (Figure 2). The national average death per facility is 3.6, which six of the twelve states that have nursing home immunity surpass.
•In looking strictly at the death rate in the nursing home population (absolute number of NH deaths/number of NH residents), we find that eight of the twelve states with immunity surpass the national average, which is 2.1 percent (Figure 3).
It is no coincidence that states that gave blanket legal immunity to for-profit businesses and corporations are the same states with the highest case fatality rates.
The following “scientific” looking paper describes that masks don’t prevent infection with the magical, mutated, novel coronavirus - COVID-19...
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... ial_policyIt would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle. The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.