Examples, results and proposed solutions.
Post Reply
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:24 am


Post by editor »

The following article, written by Gary North, gives a good explanation of modern gerrymandering.
The complete original article is found here:

I understand Gary's premise, and he may be right within the reality of the current system. However, celebrating fraud just because one is the beneficiary, seems to me a misplaced sentiment.

In my opinion, if America had honest elections, and if no one receiving public assistance was allowed to vote, this would not be an issue. Nevertheless, this is reality...

The 2016 Election Is Rigged — Fortunately
Written by Gary North on October 15, 2016

The liberal Democrat site has done yeoman service by publishing three excellent articles on how and why the House of Representatives will not go Democratic in November.
The reason is Elbridge Gerry, one of two “Founding Fathers” who really did understand practical politics. (The other was Aaron Burr.) He devised the system known as Gerrymandering. He was a Jeffersonian who figured out how to stymie the Federalists by re-drawing the districts of the Massachusetts state senate. He showed the state legislature, then under control by the Jeffersonians, how to design long, meandering districts that would embrace large numbers of Federalists, leaving the rest of the state filled with tightly knit House districts with just enough Jeffersonians living within them to win. This also turned out to work great for the House of Representatives. Here is the Wikipedia entry:
The word gerrymander (originally written Gerry-mander) was used for the first time in the Boston Gazette on 26 March 1812. The word was created in reaction to a redrawing of Massachusetts state senate election districts under Governor Elbridge Gerry (1744–1814). In 1812, Governor Gerry signed a bill that redistricted Massachusetts to benefit his Democratic-Republican Party. When mapped, one of the contorted districts in the Boston area was said to resemble the shape of a salamander.

The original gerrymander, and original 1812 gerrymander cartoon, depict the Essex South state senatorial district for the legislature of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Gerrymander.png (44.53 KiB) Viewed 5485 times
Gerrymander is a portmanteau of the governor’s last name and the word salamander. The redistricting was a notable success. Although in the 1812 election both the Massachusetts House and governorship were won by Federalists by a comfortable margin and cost Gerry his job, the redistricted state senate remained firmly in Democratic-Republican hands.
Gerrymandering is with us still. Both parties are good at it. The key is to have a runaway victory nationally in an election year that ends in a zero. These are years in which the federal census is taken. State legislatures that form in years ending in a one get to draw the electoral districts for the next decade.

I recall from my adolescence what is arguably the consummate example of a Gerrymandered district in American history: California’s 26th Congressional District. It was so Gerrymandered that the liberal Republican governor who signed the redistricting law in 1951, Earl Warren, asked for an explanation. The district began in west Los Angeles, where Jews lived and voted. It meandered narrowly across town and ended up in the geographical balloon known as Watts, where Blacks lived and voted. You can read about it here, page 83.

The year 2010 was a banner year for the Republican Party. It was a year of political reaction against Obama and ObamaCare. The House was returned to the Republican Party.

So were state legislatures. Then came the harvest: re-drawn Congressional districts. To say that they are locked up until 2021 is putting it mildly. This is what the three Salon articles discuss at length.

What this means is simple: President Clinton will not be able to get any piece of legislation through Congress that the Republicans in the House oppose. For example, there will be no "new, improved" ObamaCare, with a single payer, namely, the U.S. government. ObamaCare was cobbled together in secret in 2009 by faceless Democrat lawyers and policy wonks. This was the bill that Nancy Pelosi did not allow Congress to read in 2010 until it became law. This law will continue to raise health insurance premium costs on voters. Republicans in the House need only block any new law to fix ObamaCare, i.e., turn it into HillaryCare. Then they will be able to remind the voters every two years regarding which political party did this to them.

The Salon authors are of course livid. "It's just not fair," they cry out. But all's fair in love and politics. Gerry saw his opportunities, and he took them. That was his legacy to the modern world.


It is virtually guaranteed ...
The rest of the article...
Post Reply