Iran, Mujahedin, the CIA and big oil

False Flag -- A horrific, staged event, blamed on a political enemy and used as a pretext to start a war or enact draconian laws in the name of national security.
Post Reply
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1264
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Iran, Mujahedin, the CIA and big oil

Post by Firestarter » Sat Jan 06, 2018 2:50 pm

I was doing an investigation, trying to figure out what’s the motive for targeting Iran.
It’s probably about oil, and I tried to connect it all to the Nowruz Commission that lobbies for sanctions against Iran, but I couldn’t piece it all together (at least not yet)...

Since 28 December a mass hysteria was orchestrated in the Western media that huge amount of protesters are demanding an end to religious dictatorship and policies of Ayatollah Khamenei and President Rouhani. According to some reports, female protesters shouted “death to Khamenei”.
Please don’t tell anybody that some protesters were actually protesting for the Ayatollah, see the signs with his Photo…
Image

In June 2009 Brookings Institute published a manual on how to overthrow the Iranian government or to take control of the country. "Iran junkie" Maloney was one of the authors.WHICH PATH TO PERSIA? - Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran (pdf) came in four parts:
• Part I - Dissuading Tehran: The Diplomatic options.
• Part II - Disarming Tehran: The Military options
• Part III - Toppling Tehran: Regime Change
• Part IV - Deterring Tehran: Containment

Part III includes:
• Chapter 6: The Velvet revolution: supporting a Popular Uprising
• Chapter 7: Inspiring an insurgency: supporting Iranian Minority and opposition Groups
• Chapter 8: The coup: supporting a Military Move against the regime

The velvet "color revolution" failed in 2009 when the "green movement" could not convince the Iranian people that it was more than a foreign supported attempt to overthrow their republic.

What we currently see in Iran is a combination of chapter 6 and 7 of the Brookings plan.
In June 2016, the Wall Street Journal reported that the CIA had set up a special operation cell for orchestrating a “revolution” in Iran: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/12/ir ... .html#more

On 3 January, Iran's Revolutionary Guards declared an end to “sedition” after tens of thousands Iranians marched through cities to support the regime of Iran.
The demonstrators waved Iranian flags and pictures of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and carried signs with “Death to seditionists”, “We offer the blood in our veins to our leader” and “Down with Israel”.
Image

According to the Western state media: the “brutal clampdown on protesters left at least 21 dead”, and hundreds were arrested.

Iran's leaders claimed that the protests, which began on December 28 and quickly escalated, were part of a foreign plot to destabilise the regime. Tehran blamed the US, Saudi Arabia and Britain for the protests.
Even reformists, who backed the last major protests in 2009, condemned the violence and the support from the United States: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -down.html


If you’ve investigated Afghanistan, than you must have heard about the Mujahedin.
The Mujahedin of Afghanistan were supported by the CIA and MI5 to make Afghanistan the heroin producing capital of the world.
These Mujahedin later evolved into the Taliban and Al Qaeda (another name used for these terrorists, these days is ISIS…).

In 1965, the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) or People's Mujahedin Organisation of Iran (PMOI) was founded. A lot of Iranians despise the MEK, as this is pushing for the violent overthrow of the regime and the war and sanctions against Iran.
The MEK claims to be the Iranian government in exile.
Over the years the MEK has been labelled either revolutionary freedom fighters or terrorists.

In 1983, the MEK sided with Saddam Hussein in the CIA orchestrated Iran-Iraq war.
When the “allied forces” invaded Iraq in 2003, the US government labelled the MEK a terrorist organisation.
The UK, EU called MEK terrorist until 2008, 2009 respectively. Until 2012 the USA and Canada called it a terrorist organisation.

The wife of the so-called leader of MEK, Maryam Rajavi, is the public face of the MEK in her role as president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran.
General James Jones, President Obama's first National Security Adviser, and former New York Mayor and Trumpster Rudy Giuliani have called for the MEK to be removed from the list of terrorist organisations: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-17615065


These days the sanctions against Iran have been lifted (in part). The Nowruz commission that is affiliated with Donald Trump, George Soros, Erdogan, and the Dutch Royal family lobbies for stricter sanctions and a violent overthrow of the Iranian regime: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... t=10#p4102

My attention had been drawn to the MEK, because of the following speech by honorary co-chairman of Nowruz, Senator Ed Royce at the OIAC House Congressional reception on 17 March 2016.
And it is to such an extent that they send their own agents, who have now killed 130 members of the MEK, who have now wounded 1,300. And these are individuals in the MEK who assisted in protecting American lives from those who were bringing IEDs in to try to kill soldiers, U.S. soldiers.
We took on a special responsibility on the part of the United States when we said that we would protect the people from the attacks that were emanating out of Iran. And our responsibility today is to see that we address not just their safety and security, but also we have an investigation with respect to those who caused those attacks, those who collaborated with the agents of the Iranian regime in order to kill those MEK members.
And so I am proud of our member of our committee, Ted Poe, who has introduced a bill that will call for justice in this regard. And I intend to move that bill through the committee and off of the floor of the House of Representatives.
https://youtu.be/hP5A-wj9gpY


I was also looking into Senator’s John McCain involvement in the “war” against Iran.
McCain appears whenever bloody coups are staged, for example: Libya (Arab Spring), Syria, Ukraine (Maidan revolution).
Image

Can we soon add Iran to this list?
On 15 March 2017, McCain was part of the celebration for the “Nowruz” war against Iran, organised by the Organization of Iranian American Communities-US (OIAC): http://www.oiac-us.com/senate-nowruz-reception/

Image

The following video shows John McCain meeting Maryam Rajavi of the MEK in Albania, April 2017.
Just listen to what this great “patriot” has to say about bringing human rights to Iran. Strangely McCain forgets to mention that he is a strong supporter of genocide and dictatorship…
https://youtu.be/zY_5GV6V7Pk

Here’s information on John McCain in the Ukraine in December 2013 in the middle of Euromaidan: http://www.businessinsider.com/john-mcc ... &r=US&IR=T
Here’s McCain with Joe Biden’s son Hunter, and some more information on Hunter's board membership of Ukraine energy company Burisma: http://thefederalist.com/2014/05/13/9-q ... n-ukraine/

I think that sanctions against Iran could be just another ploy to grant a monopoly to the big oil corporations that are effectively above the law.
The result of this embargo is that the Erdogan family got a monopoly on gas from Iran.
And... Royal Dutch Shell makes billions of Euros from Iranian oil.

In March 2010, Royal Dutch Shell was caught loading Iranian crude on the oil tanker Front Page (evading sanctions). The Front Page left a port in the UAE on March 17 and reported it was going to another UAE port, then on to Saudi Arabia. Ship-tracking data reveal that Front Page also made an unreported stop, to the coast of Iran where it loaded Iranian oil.

Total SA chartered another oil tanker that stopped in Iran in March 2010. This oil tanker turned off its tracking transponder throughout the visit, according to ship-tracking data (this link is obviously not to a site affiliated with Royal Dutch Shell…): http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2010/05/2 ... iscreetly/
(archived here: http://archive.is/rk0Jf)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1264
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Iran, Mujahedin, the CIA and big oil

Post by Firestarter » Wed Jan 10, 2018 3:46 pm

On 5 January, top House Republicans Kevin McCarthy and Ed Royce introduced a resolution condemning the Iranian regime, to increase international pressure on Tehran over its handling of the demonstrations.
Royce and McCarthy explained:
The radical regime in Tehran denies basic freedoms and crushes opposition with deadly force while pushing billions of dollars to terrorist activities abroad.
Apparently they’ve got the US, Britain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and/or Israel mixed up with Iran...

The House resolution comes a day after Senators Bob Corker and Ben Cardin, introduced their own resolution in support of the war against Iranian people, calling on the UN to condemn the “ongoing human rights violations”: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... crackdown/


I had thoroughly investigated (or at least thought I did) 9/11: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... t=20#p4559

I was looking for information on Iran and was shocked to find that Iran has been sentenced to pay more than $10.5 billion because they were found guilty for the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001...
They used for “evidence” the wonderful (undisputed) work of the 9/11 Commission that was ordered to explain how the official story could have been true.
The 9/11 Commission claimed that some of the reported hijackers had not only travelled through Iran, but Iranian border authorities didn’t stamp the passports of the “terrorists”. Otherwise this group of 19 Muslim extremists would have drawn attention from the US authorities.

The most important “evidence” appears to be what former Iranian intelligence agent Abolghasem Meshabi had to say.
They also used for “evidence” the confessions of the “terrorist” that were tortured into confessing at Guantanamo Bay (and similar locations).
US expert witnesses explained that in their “expert” opinion, Iran was behind it all, including Daniel L. Byman, Janice L. Kephart, Patrick Clawson, Claire M. Lopez, Bruce D. Tefft, and Ronen Bergman.
“Investigative journalist” Kenneth Timmerman confirmed that Meshabi is very credible. Timmerman was even used as expert witness.

On 9 March 2016, a US civil court ruled that Iran must pay the victims of 9/11 more than $10.5 billion in fines (this is just a short document without explanation):
The Ashton plaintiffs are awarded a default judgment against Iran in the amount of $7,494,720,000. The Federal Insurance plaintiffs are awarded a default judgment against Iran in the amount of $3,040,998,426.03.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/di ... 39284/785/


The same judge that pronounced Iran guilty, George B. Daniels, had on 29 September 2015 ruled that Saudi Arabia can’t be sued because it has sovereign immunity.
On 14 March 2016, Iran’s Foreign Ministry said Iran won’t pay, because:
The ruling is ludicrous and absurd to the point that it makes a mockery of the principle of justice while [it] further tarnishes the US judiciary’s reputation.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/03/ ... s-pay.html


On 23 May 2013, FBI Agent Daniel A. Mehochko was honored for his report in which he explained that the events of 9/11: provided an unprecedented opportunity for a strategic rapprochement between the United States and Iran”.
Iran didn’t even claim that 9/11 was nothing but a false flag …
At the January 2002 Afghanistan Donors Conference in Tokyo, Iran even pledged $540 million in assistance for the new Afghan puppet government, compared to the $290 million committed by the United States: https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/ ... -9-11.html


The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) of Trump backer Sheldon Adelson also pushes for the war against Iran.
For more information on Sheldon Adelson, who on 3 October met Donald Trump and Jared Kushner at the White House to discuss strategies to make the most out of the 1 October Las Vegas “mass shooting”: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 1156#p4358

The FDD explained that it’s unreasonable that Iran didn’t pay after it was sentenced to pay more than $56 billion to American terror victims. This includes over $1 billion that were awarded against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei himself.

This sort of means that Iran can be found liable for every terrorist attack for which Hezbollah, Hamas and even USAma Bin Laden had already been “proven” guilty. To me that this looks like changing history in the best Orwellian tradition…
On 20 April 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled that nearly $2 billion in frozen Iranian government funds must be turned over to injured survivors and families of Americans killed in several terrorist attacks for which Iran was found liable by US courts. Even after this $2 billion has been paid (how much of this went to the lawyers?) Iran still owes $53 billion in outstanding federal court judgments to American victims of “Iranian terrorism”: http://www.defenddemocracy.org/media-hi ... d-us-cour/
(archived here: http://archive.is/Rjqck)

Havlish obtained a $6.1 billion judgment against Iran, but Iran refused to pay.
On 25 May 2016, the US court ruled that victims of the 9/11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, wouldn´t get (part of) the $2.1 billion that Royal Dutch Shell rightfully owed Iran, but couldn´t pay because of the sanctions.
Maybe Shell would rather keep the $2.1 billion…

The US District Court in New York decided that Royal Dutch Shell doesn´t conduct a “continuous and systematic” business in the state of New York, so has no jurisdiction: http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2017/08/1 ... shell-plc/


According to Reuters, in March 2012 an Iranian tanker delivered 1.5 million barrels of oil to Shell’s refinery in Singapore despite sanctions.
Royal Dutch Shell claimed that it “complies with all all applicable sanctions”.
Some industry sources claim that Shell is one of the biggest consumers of Iranian crude worldwide: https://www.reuters.com/article/iran-cr ... 5620120302
(archived here: http://archive.is/Xzogu)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1264
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Iran, Mujahedin, the CIA and big oil

Post by Firestarter » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:05 pm

Israel's Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman says Iran is on the brink of economic and military collapse: “They know that the Iranian regime is in its final days and will soon collapse”.
Lieberman also said that Israel will attack: “Every military outpost in Syria in which Iran seems to be trying to dig in militarily, we will destroy”.

According to the “reliable” Washington Times, adviser to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Ali Shirazi, said earlier this month: “If you provide an excuse for Iran, Tel Aviv and Haifa will be razed to the ground”: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04- ... final-days


There is also a story that Iran will leave the petro-dollar and have their oil paid for in Euros. If more oil exporting countries follow this example the US dollar could crash...
Before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Saddam Hussein wanted Iraqi oil paid in Euros, and Gaddafi even wanted Libyan oil paid for in gold, before he was lynched in the “Arabic spring”.

Last month, Tehran announced that US currency will no longer be allowed.
Iran is also developing cryptocurrencies: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/i ... y_04232018
Post Reply