people travel and persons drive

Can governments lawfully restrict, register, or otherwise encumber our free right to travel? Should they? Discussions on Right to Travel.
Post Reply
scar
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:49 am

people travel and persons drive

Post by scar » Sun Jun 21, 2015 7:17 pm

i mean there's two entities to consider here...

a person can never travel, that's like a legal impossibility...
and a people/human being can't really drive either; the term "drive" has been hijacked by the state for its benefit...

a person is actually more like a vehicle, something our human body uses for its benefit from the state/government

that's basically right, right?
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 769
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: people travel and persons drive

Post by notmartha » Mon Jun 22, 2015 12:17 pm

Kinda sorta, right... :lol:

We're dealing with 3 entities here. Persons need people to animate them. Even if the person is a dog or a car (I've seen court cases with a car named as defendant ...) it needs a people to represent it. So a person is not driving or traveling without a people. Think of a person as a mask that can only move with the man wearing it. Sometimes one people can represent more than one person, and sometimes not.

A couple of years ago a guy drove with his corporate "person" in the seat next to him as his "passenger" in a carpool lane. The court did not agree that there were two people in the car. (They flip flopped the terms, using them as was convenient)

Human beings are something different and not synonymous with people.

From The Words of His Kingdom and the words of the world compared:
Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'? These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead.' This is how the world makes its attachment to you. The terms, 'person', 'individual', 'human being', etc., are not in Christ. Words like "individual," and "human being" do not even appear in scripture! These are 'created' terms by the natural man (1 Corinthians 2:14). These words describe the 'old man', but not the 'new man' in Christ (Colossians 3:9-10).

In Balantine's Self Pronouncing Law Dictionary, 1948, page 389, Human Being is defined as "See Monster." On page 540 of this same Law Dictionary, Monster is defined as "a human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal."

In Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Edition, 1988, page 879, a Monster is defined as "a person so cruel, wicked, depraved, etc., as to horrify others."

From the Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd Ed., page 901, Human Being means a "Natural man: unenlightened or unregenerate," and on page 1461, Unregenerate means "not regenerate; unrepentant; an unregenerate sinner; not convinced by or unconverted to a particular religion; wicked, sinful, dissolute."

In Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Ed., 1988, p. 657, Humanitarianism means "the doctrine that humankind may become perfect without divine aid."

In Colliers New Dictionary of the English Language, 1928, Humanitarian is defined as "a philanthropist; an anti-Trinitarian who rejects the doctrine of Christ's divinity; a perfectionist."

And in the Random House Webster's College Dictionary, 1990, page 653, Humanism is defined as "any system or mode of thought or action in which human interests, values and dignity predominate, especially an ethical theory that often rejects the importance of a belief in God."

Therefore, when anyone calls himself or herself a ‘human being,’ they are saying, "I’m an animal; I’m a monster; I’m not saved; I’m unrepentant; I'm an unregenerate sinner; I'm not converted; I’m wicked, sinful, and dissolute; I’m cruel, depraved, and unenlightened; and I reject Christ's divinity and the importance of a belief in God."

Dear reader, do you still consider yourself a human being?
The above defined words are also synonymous with the term 'natural man.'

"The natural man is a spiritual monster. His heart is where his feet should be, fixed upon the earth; his heels are lifted up against heaven, which his heart should be set on. His face is towards hell; his back towards heaven. He loves what he should hate, and hates what he should love; joys in what he ought to mourn for, and mourns for what he ought to rejoice in; glories in his shame, and is ashamed of his glory; abhors what he should desire, and desires what he should abhor." Thomas Boston, quoted in Toplady’s, Complete Works (1794, reprinted by Sprinkle Pub. 1987), page 584.

And the Word confirms:

"But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." 1 Corinthians 2:14

The above verse witnesses to us that the natural man is spiritually dead. The 'natural man' in Scripture is synonymous with the 'natural person' as defined in man's laws:

Natural Person: "Any human being who as such is a legal entity as distinguished from an artificial person, like a corporation, which derives its status as a legal entity from being recognized so in law. Natural Child: "The ordinary euphemism for 'bastard' or illegitimate." Amon v. Moreschi, 296 N.Y. 395, 73 N.E.2d 716." Max Radin, Radin's Law Dictionary,1955, p. 216.

"'Natural Person' means human being, and not an artificial or juristic person." Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Valley Farms, 610 A. 2d. 652, 654; 222 Conn. 361.

Those that are spiritually dead belong to the prince of this world because he's dead himself. Satan has dominion over the natural man, for he is the prince of this world (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11); and, as a consequence of this, he has dominion over those of the world, i.e., human beings, the natural man – those who receive not the things of the Spirit of God and reject Christ. Because the bondman in Christ is sanctified from the world, he is separated from the adversary's dominion over him–sin (John 8:34). This is the cause for Christ having sanctified Himself in the Truth of the Word of God – to provide the entrance to the refuge in and through Himself for us.
Post Reply