Geert Wilders – illuminati puppet

[Firestarter]

Over here in the Netherlands we have our own Donald Duck - Geert Wilders,
I don’t have to explain the political campaign of Geert Wilders to anybody familiar with Donald Trump (mostly anti-Muslim and Law and order). The name of the party of Wilders - PVV –translates Party for Freedom.
In 2008 Geert Wilders achieved some international notoriety with the movie “Fitna”, which was mostly an imitation of “Obsession” from 2 years earlier.

ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT POLITICIAN
When Pim Fortuyn was murdered in 2002 the elite invented a new way to prevent “dangerous” politicians to get a lot of votes – it’s a trick I call the anti-establishment politician…
I won’t claim this was invented in the Netherlands (or new). The whole Communist doctrine and socialist/labour/left tells the poor that they will help them, which is a ploy to keep the slaves motivated. Arguably this strategy was perfected in my home country with Geert Wilders.
I already know what to expect for the coming parliament’s elections in the Netherlands (on March 15: tweede kamerverkiezingen). All the attention on Geert Wilders in a desperate ploy to make the subjects of King Willem-Alexander interested in politicrics.
Protest marches “against” Geert Wilders with major press coverage, with exaggerated poll ratings.


THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BAD PRESS
Geert Wilders is the single politician that draws by far the most attention in the Netherlands – most of it “negative”.
The government has even started several court cases to give Wilders more attention (and votes). The state media have also made it public knowledge that Geert Wilders is threatened by Muslim terrorists so the Dutch government protects him 24/7 and provides him with a safe house.
Even the British government helped Wilders get media attention by banning him in February 2009 and - after Wilders took a plane to London anyway (accompanied by the state media) - detaining him at the airport and then sending him back on the next plane. Then the decision was overruled so Geert Wilders could come to England in a blaze of publicity.

If you want to see how the state media is helping Geert Wilders; just look at the enormous size of his (English) Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geert_Wilders
Compare this for example to - the relatively small page for - the Minister President of the Netherlands since 2010 Mark Rutte (who coincidentally studied history in Leiden with the current King Willem-Alexander): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Rutte
Even Down Under protest marches were organised to give Geert Wilders more attention. Here’s a picture from February 2013: a protest march to increase Wilders’ popularity, when he came to Australia.



ZIONISM
Geert Wilders is one of the longest sitting members of parliament in the Netherlands (since 1998).
Geert Wilders has strong ties with the Zionist movement. When he was 18/19 he lived in Israel and he has visited Israel 40 times in the last 25 years. Geert Wilders has confirmed that he feels completely at home in Israel.
In 1992 Wilders married a Jewish woman.
In May 2007 an article in the Dutch newspaper “De Telegraaf” appeared about Geert Wilders’ regular visits to the Israeli embassy in the Hague (Wilders himself confirmed monthly).
When the Zionist Avigdor Lieberman visited the Netherlands, he had a private dinner with Wilders. During one of his visits to Israel, Wilders met with Aryeh Eldad of the extremist Hatikva Party.

Geert Wilders was also financially supported by the Zionist movement from the USA by David Horowitz in 2014: https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/al ... l-us-donor
In 2009, 2010 and 2011 Wilders’ lawyers were financed by the Middle East forum of Daniel Pipes. He was also supported by Pamela Geller (of Stop Islamization of America): http://www.reuters.com/article/us-dutch ... A720120910


MOSSAD AGENT
The most interesting about Geert Wilders is a testimony (in Dutch): http://www.wanttoknow.nl/hoofdartikelen ... is-de-mol/
This testimony by M.B. Kwint-de Roos from June 2, 2010 - that looks genuine – the first page can be seen below, describes what Geert Wilders said at the 1991 VVD Christmas party when he had a little too much to drink: http://static.ow.ly/docs/wilders-verklaring-nw_ie2.pdf

Geert Wilders biological parents are a Dutch father from colonial Indonesia and a Dutch Jewish mother [which means he’s a Jew].
Wilders was recruited by an Israeli Intelligence agency, that trained him, which included torture.
Wilders has both a Dutch and Israeli passport.
Wilders’ career was completely arranged by others: including his marriage/divorce to his first wife and marriage to current spouse.


Kwint-de Roos testified that she reported this to the secretary of the VVD party - A. Ament - and the Dutch intelligence agency BVD (now called AIVD).
Of course it’s possible that this is all just a political trick by the VVD to discredit Geert Wilders.
I tried to find information about Mrs. Kwint-de Roos and came up with nothing. Ament was indeed the “Ambtelijke secretaris” for the VVD. Some websites claim that within a year from June 2010 Kwint-de Roos died under suspicious circumstances (a strange disease).
Several sources have confirmed that Geert Wilders had Elliot Wagschal working for him, that had worked at the Israeli embassy before he joined Wilders’ team. According to several sources Wilders asked a lot of questions straight from the Israeli embassy to the Minstery of Foreign affairs (Buitenlandse zaken),


PARENTS
Wilders supposedly contradicted the official story about his parents – (falsely?) claiming that his father comes from Indonesia and mother from the Netherlands.
The grandmother from his mother’s side was the Indo/Jewish Johanna Ording-Meijer (Indo means Dutch and Indonesian ancestry), which confirms that the mother of Geert Wilders was Jewish (Meijer is a well-known Dutch-Jewish name), but contradicts that she came from the Netherlands: http://www.icare.to/article.php?id=22330&lang=en
I tried to find pictures of the parents of Geert Wilders. I didn’t find any photo of his father. I believe this is his mother (she doesn’t look very Indonesian).


To hide his Indonesian roots Geert Wilders has bleached his hair (even more wonderful than Trump’s hair).

[Firestarter]

The Dutch state media have really outdone themselves this time to give Geert Wilders some additional media coverage.

They have made a great story about the cop Faris K. (of the DBB unit) that is suspected of leaking confidential information to Muslim criminals. The DBB protects amongst others politicians and the Royal family.
Faris was released from prison, last February 23.

Faris wasn’t on the team that protects Geert Wilders, but they have made a big story involving the PVV anyway.
To get the most result out of this incident the PVV has stopped making public appearances. Geert Wilders said that he will only resume campaigning after knowing what confidential information Faris leaked (in Dutch): http://www.volkskrant.nl/politiek/pvv-s ... ~a4466348/

Wilders even compared his situation to the in 2002 murdered politician Pim Fortuyn; who wasn’t protected so you’ll understand it’s really the same.
The Dutch elections for the Tweede kamer will be on March 15.

[Firestarter]

It looks like the state media is getting hysteric; not knowing which new lies to cook up for the masses.

Apparently the confidential information that Faris K. “leaked”, was telling 2 women that he worked for the DBB, which protects the Royal family and Geert Wilders.
Faris was just trying to impress these chicks (in Dutch): http://www.msn.com/nl-nl/nieuws/binnenl ... ailsignout

On February 12, Geert Wilders said on the German TV, that it is so difficult for people to join his PVV party, because Pim Fortuyn was murdered by a radical Muslim. That would be a ridiculous answer to the question even if it was true (in Dutch): http://www.ad.nl/binnenland/wilders-for ... ~a168abba/
According to the state media Pim Fortuyn was murdered by the white animal rights activist Volkert van der G. (no Muslim).
Wilders only apologised 2 weeks later (February 26) that he had meant to say that Theo van Gogh was murdered by a Muslim. Theo van Gogh was a filmmaker, son of an intelligence agent (BVD), who investigated the murder of his friend Fortuyn together with the writer Tomas Ross (another son of a BVD agent).
According to the official story Van Gogh was murdered by a radical Muslim for insulting the Islam. If Wilders had meant to say Van Gogh, it makes no sense at all to explain why it’s so difficult to join the PVV.

To explain how ridiculous this mix-up is, a comparable example.
This could be seen as a politician answering a question about not staying in a hotel, with John F. Kennedy was murdered in a hotel by a jealous woman. And then 2 weeks later apologising that he had meant to say that Sam Cooke was murdered by a jealous woman.

[Firestarter]

I’m really impressed with the latest trick by the state media to help Geert Wilders. This trick is performed with the help of Turkey.

Later this year a referendum in Turkey is planned, to give the Turkish President Erdogan more possibilities to fight (for) terrorism. To make Geert Wilders even more popular: Turkey, on March 3 Turkey announced sending foreign Minister Cavusoglu to the Netherlands on campaign (for Wilders). Prime Minister Mark Rutte declared that this is totally unwanted.
The plane for Cavusoglu was barred from flying to Rotterdam, where a large amount of Dutch Turks survive.
On March 8, Geert Wilders with a few members of his PVV party went over to the Turkish consulate protesting with a sign in both Turkish and Dutch “Stay away! This is our country” to protest for the coming of the Turkish Minister.


Minister Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya came by car from Germany to the Netherlands on March 11 instead of Cavusoglu, with much press attention. Mayor Aboutaleb announced that Kaya is not welcome in Rotterdam and she wasn’t allowed to leave her car in the Netherlands and sent straight back to Germany.
The Turkish government issued threatening statements towards the Netherlands, while several Dutch politicians and the state media, in one of those ironic twists, called the “democratically” elected Erdogan a dictator - all to give Wilders more votes!

Last March 11, In front of the Turkish consulate in Rotterdam an estimated couple of thousand Dutch Turks, completely brainwashed by Turkish TV, demonstrated because the Turkish Minister wasn’t allowed entry in the Netherlands.
When there were only a few hundred Dutch Turks left at 1 AM the following morning , the riot squad felt it was time to attack; injuring several Dutch Turks. They swiftly had the situation under control: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-1 ... key-closed


Just Yesterday, March 12, I rode on my bike and passed a demonstration of a few hundred Dutch Turks in Amsterdam. A lot of them were young people walking on the street waving red flags with white pentagrams and some yelling. I could ride by them without any problems.
I saw a large amount of police, something like 50 cops, for such a small group of protesters.
Around 10:45 PM the riot squad attacked this little Group of protesters. It was more difficult for the riot squad to find the Dutch Turks than chase them away.

The day before, March 11, I had to take another route because I was blocked by a relatively large group of protesters of some 20,000 people in the Women’s March (not only women by the way).
While the Turkish protesters get lots of attention from the press, I could harldy find information on the Women’s March: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/841064509242503168

[editor]

I'm curious about your perspective, Firestarter.

From what news I've been able to find, and you know I seek out alternative sources to mainstream media, it appears Geert Wilders is mainly running on a platform opposing Muslim immigration.

Aren't the elite "illuminati" globalist types the ones who are pushing for Muslim immigration, so as to dilute traditional strongholds of nationalism?

If Wilders is the illuminatti's man, why is he pushing anti-immigration? Are you saying he's lying, and will turnabout 180 degrees if elected? What is it you're accusing him of, exactly?

You're in a much closer proximity to know, so I'm just looking for some objective reporting. Otherwise, from what I'm reading, it seems Wilders is another example of a Trump or Le Pen, at least insofar as their populist anti-immigration stance.

While you're at it, what are your thoughts on Le Pen?

[Firestarter]

From what news I've been able to find, and you know I seek out alternative sources to mainstream media, it appears Geert Wilders is mainly running on a platform opposing Muslim immigration.

Aren't the elite "illuminati" globalist types the ones who are pushing for Muslim immigration, so as to dilute traditional strongholds of nationalism?

You're absolutely right, I will try to explain.
While Geert Wilders talks about stopping Muslim migration in reality this is only a ploy to get us interested in politrics (while migration continues). The reason why the elite stimulate migration, is that this is THE way to hide the depopulation agenda21 in full swing.

In the Netherlands the state media blame migrants for not "integrating". I don't know if this has a comparable meaning in English. Basically the migrants are being blamed for not living like and mingling with the Dutch.
When I walk through my home town of Amsterdam, I see an almost complete segregation. Districts where, I as a white, am completely outnumbered by Muslims (mostly Arabs and Turks). In other districts white people are by far the majority.
I sometimes pass schools, where I see 90% Arab looking children playing together, then pass another school in another district where I see 90% white children.

I remember that in the 1980s we were warned that the Netherlands is the most densely populated country in the whole wide world. Since then we’ve been told that the population has been steadily rising (from 14 million in the 1980s to 17 million in 2017).
There is nothing like breaking up roads to keep the traffic jammed. There is nothing like extra short trains to make the trains very crowded.

We are also told that the Dutch die averagely at more than 80 years old (reportedly one of the eldest in the whole wide world).
Here’s a picture from 2014 of the Dappermarkt in Amsterdam; where did all the white and old people go?

While you're at it, what are your thoughts on Le Pen?

My idea is that Marine le Pen is just another puppet for the elite (just like Donald Trump, Barack Obama and Geert Wilders).


Tomorrow (15 March 2017) are the elections in the Netherlands for the tweede kamer.
At this moment the amount of seats for the major parties in the tweede kamer are (a total of 150 seats): VVD - 41, PvdA - 38, PVV - 15, CDA - 13, SP - 15, GL - 4, D66 - 12.

I ignore the Christen Unie (CU), because they always get a few seats, but never many.
I’ve found the poll predictions here: http://frontbencher.nl/peilingen/

I present them in the following order - 3/9 IPSOS, 3/9 TNS NIPO, 3/13 I&O Research, 3/13 Een vandaag, 3/13 Maurice de Hond.
VVD – 26, 26, 24, 24, 27
PvdA – 11, 14, 13, 10, 9
SP - 13, 15, 14, 16, 14
CDA - 21, 17, 17, 21, 21
PVV - 23, 24, 20, 24, 24
D66 - 17, 21, 18, 16, 19
GL - 14, 14, 20, 16, 16

Usually the poll prediction for the PVV is too high, while the prediction for the SP is too low…

[editor]

Firestarter, you seem to be full of contradictions.

Firestarter wrote:
While Geert Wilders talks about stopping Muslim migration in reality this is only a ploy to get us interested in politrics (while migration continues). The reason why the elite stimulate migration, is that this is THE way to hide the depopulation agenda21 in full swing.

The usual argument is that no one is educated about politics, or even interested, thus the ignorant apathetic masses elect bad candidates. Your argument seems to be, "Wilders gets people interested in politics, and this is bad."

You admit Wilders is anti-Muslim-immigration, and you admit Muslim immigration is bad because, as you say, mass immigration furthers the aims of Agenda21. You even bemoan the Muslim immigrants' lack of cultural integration with the Dutch culture. Yet somehow you draw the conclusion Wilders is bad.

I can understand if you believe Wilders is lying, and that if elected he will not honor his promises to end or drastically reduce the mass influx of migrants-- after all, political candidates everywhere and forever have been famous for not living up to campaign promises. But the way I understand it, PM Rutte is not even claiming he will stem the flow of immigrants-- he's flatly pro-immigration, right? Just like Merkel?

I watched Le Pen do an interview a week or so ago with a Brit host of a show called "Hard Talk". The host (I don't know his name) tried everything he could to trip her up, put words in her mouth, and paint her in a bad light. Le Pen destroyed him; I was impressed. A few days later Le Pen fearlessly called Merkel out on the floor of the EU parliament, with some of the most inflamitory language I've ever heard used in such a setting, at least between representatives of countries not engaged in actual open war. It looks to me like she's serious and, if elected, intends to follow through with her rhetoric.

In my experience, "puppets for the elite" are not nearly so forceful, or quick-witted as Le Pen, or Trump. The Obamas and Clintons of the world are fine when they have teleprompters to back them up, and not so great (seriously, do you even need a link?) when left to their own devices.

I don't know much about Wilders, except what I've read about his outspoken position on immigration. I would like to think I could trust your negative opinion of him. However, I have followed Trump's campaign closely. So far the media, American Democrats AND Republicans have sold him short and, Firestarter, so have you. So far, my best description of your reporting of Trump would be this quote from Socrates:

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

[editor]

I can definitely say this of Le Pen, in agreement with Motorwinter, who commented along with his post of the video Marine Le Pen on Muslims and Nigel Farage,

Marine Le Pen puts Laura Kuenssberg from BBC Newsnight in her box. The typically agenda riven bias was well in evidence here when Kuenssberg tried to get Le Pen to say that UKIP and the FN were fellow travellers. I found Ms Le Pen very adept at keeping control of the interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83NsHR5-0-Y

The only tactic the BBC had left as a way to spin the interview was to comment after the clip was finished. Cowardly and irresponsible on the part of the BBC, imho.

[editor]

Clinton-Style Scandal on the Eve of Dutch Election

Today's news confirms my post from last night as to Rutte's intentions for the Netherlands. It seems to me this story should end any chance of Rutte's re-election, and put Wilders over the top.

Merkel's Migrant Deception

by Vijeta Uniyal,

Original source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-1 ... -deception

• As it now turns out, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán was right about a "secret deal" all along.
• In a government report published last month by the German newspaper Rheinische Post, experts recommended an annual intake of up to 300,000 migrants a year for the next 40 years, to counter lower German birth rates.
• As they embark on a bizarre social engineering project on a continental scale, members of Germany's political class evidently do not see the need to consult even their own electorates. Instead, they apparently believe in creating irreversible facts on the ground, and giving voting rights to migrants permanently residing in Germany.

"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied," people use to say in days of the Soviet Union. Today, the same seems to be true for the European Union's migrant policy. When German Chancellor Angela Merkel engineered the EU-Turkey deal on migrants, it was widely described by the European politicians and the media as a "breakthrough". Merkel and other EU leaders agreed on offering a down payment of €3 billion to the regime of Turkey's President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in return for its promises to "stem migrant flows".

In December 2015, nearly four months before the EU-Turkey agreement was even formalized, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán accused Chancellor Merkel of working on a "secret deal" with her Turkish counterparts. President Orbán was quite specific in his claims, apparently certain that Berlin would soon reveal the details to the public.

"Beyond what we agreed with Turkey in Brussels there's something that doesn't figure in the agreement," President Orbán said in December 2015. "We'll wake up one day -- and I think this will be announced in Berlin as soon as this week -- that we have to take in 400,000 to 500,000 refugees directly from Turkey."

President Orbán was ridiculed for his claims. European Commission Vice President Frans Timmermans dismissed President Orbán's allegations of a secret deal with Turkey as "nonsense".

Bloomberg News reported the German and French outrage to President Orbán's allegations at that time:

"France and Germany are working together to manage the flow of migrants, which is a challenge to everyone," French government spokesman Stephane Le Foll told reporters in Paris on Wednesday. "Last weekend the union reached an agreement with Turkey," and Orban should be aware of the details since he was there, Le Foll said.

A German government official, requesting anonymity because EU-Turkey talks are ongoing, said Orban's claim that Germany made a secret deal is false.

As it now turns out, PM Orbán was right about a "secret deal" all along. According to the latest revelations made by the German newspaper Die Welt, Chancellor Merkel, along with Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, had agreed to accept 150,000 to 200,000 Syrian migrants from Turkey into the EU without consulting other European member states.

Die Welt reported on March 13, 2017:

Contrary to previous information, German Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte made concrete commitments on a legal refugee quota during the negotiations on the refugee deal between the EU and Turkey. Merkel and Rutte promised directly to bring in 150,000 to 200,000 Syrian refugees to Europe from Turkey each year...

The plan agreed upon by Merkel, [Turkey's Prime Minister] Davutoglu and Rutte was presented the following day as an unexpected suggestion by Turkey. The heads of the state and governments agreed on a "voluntary intake due to humanitarian reason" in the final document of the summit.

The exact number was not revealed to the European [leaders] by Merkel, Davutoglu or Rutte. The three heads of government reached an understanding on the number 150,000 to 250,000 through a gentleman's agreement. This has been confirmed by several individuals involved in the negotiations.

There is a plausible reason why Merkel and Rutte are still hiding these migrant figures from the public. Both Rutte and Merkel have to face their voters this year and are looking at a real prospect of anti-mass immigration parties making strong gains in the March and September general elections respectively.

Regardless of any secret dealings, however, the idea of importing hundreds of thousands of migrants into Europe fits seamlessly into what seems to be Merkel's agenda of transforming the German and European demography.

In September 2015, before the migrant crisis could even fully unfold, Germany's Vice-Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel declared that country could absorb up to 500,000 migrants each year.

In a government report published last month by the German newspaper Rheinische Post, experts recommended an annual intake of up to 300,000 migrants a year for the next 40 years, to counter lower German birth rates. According to these official estimates, Germany will have to take in 12 million migrants to keep the current size of the German population -- 82 million -- stable through 2060.

As they embark on a bizarre social engineering project on a continental scale, members of Germany's political class evidently do not see the need to consult even their own electorates. Instead, they apparently believe in creating irreversible facts on the ground. They are even proposing a contingency plan to thwart a potential backlash from the population. In case of any future national referendum, Germany's Federal Commissioner for Refugees and Migrants, Aydan Özoguz, recommends giving voting rights to migrants permanently residing in Germany.

Considering the ironclad support for Merkel's "Refugees Welcome" policy in the German media and across the political establishment, there seems to be a consensus within Germany's political establishment to keep the floodgates of mass-migration open, no matter how high the price.

For Merkel and Germany's political elite, the victims of Islamist terror attacks across Germany or the hundreds of women who were sexually assaulted in Cologne's central square on New Year's Eve are merely roadkill on the Autobahn leading to their promised multicultural paradise.

[Firestarter]

Mark Rutte is not much different than the state media; he is the most important spokesman for King Willem-Alexander (with whom he studied history in Leiden). His speeches are written by the government.
Rutte has no “executive power”, when part of the cabinet (headed by the King) he cannot even vote against the bills of the King (only the members of the tweede kamer and eerste kamer can vote)…
There is a real scandal in the Netherlands, comparable to the "Franklin cover-up", involving Mark Rutte, Geert Wilders, Piet Hein Donner (Vice-President of the Raad van State), Prince Bernhard, Prince Friso, Mabel Wisse Smit (wife of Friso) and George Soros. See the following quote from the thread "The totalitarian state".

THE NETHERLANDS – CHILD DETENTION & WAR CHILD
It is known that some European countries have a greater demand per capita for children from abroad than the USA, notably Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, France, and the Netherlands. I think this is a good time to give some information about the sexual abuse and ritual sacrifice in my home country the Netherlands.
The attorney Anne Marie van Blijenburgh was disbarred in 2001 because she blew the whistle on the Dutch elite sexually abusing and murdering orphans from child detention centres in the Netherlands in a satanic ritual.
In a testimony of June 5, 2014 Van Blijenburgh named the following participants (very powerful people all of them): Prince Friso, Mabel Wisse Smit (wife of Friso), Piet Hein Donner (former minister and vice-president of the Raad van State), Mark Rutte (Prime Minister), Geert Wilders (THE anti-establishment politician in the Netherlands), Ernst Hirsch Ballin (former minister), Guus Pareau Dumont (psychiatrist of Friso), Carla Eradus (president of the court in Amsterdam), Erik van Emster (former head of all judges), Gerlof Leistra (journalist at Elsevier) and George Soros (president of the Open Society Institute): http://whale.to/c/child_sacrificemurder_by_queen.html

Mabel Wisse Smit made a name for herself by working for ABN AMRO bank, United Nations and the Open Society Institute of George Soros, where she played a major part in the destruction of and genocide in former Yugoslavia: https://mightynose.wordpress.com/catego ... ody-hands/

In 1995 Mabel together with Willemijn Verloop founded War Child Holland. War Child “helps” children from war areas. Preferably orphans without any family that won’t be missed if they disappear without a trace. Nobody seems to understand what this means (at least I have found nothing hard on the internet)…
Hillary Clinton herself had a good talk with the founder of War Child North America: http://warchildusa.org/news/detail/when ... t_hillary/

Don't you think it's ironic that the state media in the Netherlands are filled with horror stories about the Turkish dictator Erdogan, while Erdogan accuses Germany and the Netherlands of being Nazis, while they make secret deals.

Contrary to previous information, German Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte made concrete commitments on a legal refugee quota during the negotiations on the refugee deal between the EU and Turkey. Merkel and Rutte promised directly to bring in 150,000 to 200,000 Syrian refugees to Europe from Turkey each year...

It's not even surprising to me that the Netherlands is the country with the biggest investments in Turkey with some 22 billion USD: https://translate.google.com/translate? ... edit-text=

I can definitely say this of Le Pen, in agreement with Motorwinter, who commented along with his post of the video Marine Le Pen on Muslims and Nigel Farage,

Marine Le Pen puts Laura Kuenssberg from BBC Newsnight in her box. The typically agenda riven bias was well in evidence here when Kuenssberg tried to get Le Pen to say that UKIP and the FN were fellow travellers. I found Ms Le Pen very adept at keeping control of the interview.

Clearly we disagree on this video; to me this only confirms that Marine le Pen is a puppet for the elite. Le Pen spreads the same kind of fear for Muslims as the state media. This is similar to the propaganda we heard in the 1970s and 1980s about the threat of Communism. Making us so afraid for “the enemy”, that we believe that the only way to protect us is a strong government and draconian laws.
The murdered Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn wanted to drastically cut on government spending, including a strongly diminished army.


With 96.2% of the votes counted (9:45 AM CET); the seats in the tweede kamer are expected to be.
VVD - 33, PvdA - 9, SP - 14, CDA - 19, PVV - 20, D66 - 19, GL – 14: https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/03/16/de ... e-a1550523

The PvdA lost even more than the polls indicated; as expected the PVV won less than the polls indicated. The loss for the PvdA is dramatic, from 38 to 9 seats.
GL (Green Left) is the biggest winner, not the PVV.

The PvdA (Labour party) was founded in 1946. In 1956 the amount of seats in the tweede kamer was expended from 100 to 150.
The lowest ever for the PvdA (until now) was 23 in 2002 (the election when Pim Fortuyn was murdered). Already a year later (2003) Queen Beatrix had the Dutch electorate back to the voting booth, and the PvdA was back at 42 seats.