Dutch people who take these freedoms a little too literally are known to meet unfortunate “accidents” and get into legal trouble...
Somebody named Erwin Lensink has an interesting “conspiracy” site that’s blatantly blocked by Google, Yahoo and their ilk; it’s probably one of the better Dutch “conspiracy” sites: http://erwinlensinkvrij.nl/english
After Lensink’s mother died, officially of a suicide, since April 2008, he was repeatedly harassed by the cops. This includes being locked up in custody of the police and forced mental evaluation by psychiatrist.
On 21 September 2010 (derde dinsdag van September), out of frustration, Lensink threw a small object at “De Gouden Koets” (with then Queen Beatrix in it).
Since then Lensink has repeatedly been locked up and tortured by sadistic psychiatrists
Lensink continues to protest against the Dutch Dictatorship, including several legal procedures (besides his personal website).
In May 2014, Lensink found out that the claws of the Dutch Royal family reach into Germany. He was arrested in Münster, when he was standing with a protest sign waiting for King Willem-Alexander and Queen Maxima (in Dutch): https://www.parool.nl/binnenland/waxine ... ~a3662425/
Lensink’s sign refers to the (Nazi) Rost van Tonningen, German boy Manuel Schadwald (who was sexually abused and murdered in the Netherlands) and the Joris Demmink “affair” (the cover-up to hide the ritual child abuse by the Dutch elite, including Royal family).
Lensink amongst others calls our greatly beloved Royal Family “bastards”, and has “evidence” (or at least strong arguments) to support that claim.
Lensink calls this treason. Lensink also calls our Royal family despots and the Dutch Monarchy a “dictatorship”.
When King Willem III married Queen Emma he was in his 60s and (probably) already infertile. This means that Wilhelmina (daughter of Emma, and later Queen) and her offspring have no right to the throne: http://vivanepotista.com/post/508648823 ... l-house-of
In December 2016, a homeless man reported that Erwin Lensink was again locked up by insane psychiatrists, and that he himself received several threats for trying to contact Lensink (in Dutch): http://nicovandenham2.blogspot.nl/2016/ ... n-der.html
On 14 July 2016, a citizen of the Netherlands got sentenced to 30 days in jail of which 16 days conditionally with probation of 2 years (coincidentally had already spent 14 days in pre-trial detention) for insulting King Willem-Alexander.
On Facebook, this “criminal” called our greatly beloved King: murderer, rapist, oppressor, thief, and subject(?). He had also photoshopped the face of Willem-Alexander on the head of the victim of an execution.
The verdict showed that his own attorney had pleaded against him: https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archiv ... lt/491498/
I think it could be argued that the Orange-Nassau billionaires have abused their dictatorial powers, to steal, finance the Armenian genocide, finance Hitler and were/are involved in mass murder, for example in Serbia and Afghanistan.
For information on the destruction and looting of (former) Yugoslavia, with the help of Mabel Wisse Smit, who later married Prince Friso and cofounded Warchild Netherlands: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1038#p3773
It’s much harder to prove that Willem-Alexander personally have been involved in these Royal prerogatives.
In December 2002, Prince Bernhard complained to Forbes that the wealth of the Dutch Royal family was exaggerated and demanded that the figure is lowered. In 2002, the net worth of the Dutch Royal family was $2.5 billion; in 2003, their wealth dropped to $250 million (and has stayed in the hundreds of millions since).
The assets of the Orange-Nassaus included some 10% of the stocks Royal Dutch Shell and they are also majority shareholders in other companies.
Republican Association member Hans van den Bergh (who died in 2011 of “cancer”) estimated the worth of the Orange-Nassaus between $17 billion and $23 billion, including Rembrandt paintings and silver from tsarist Russia: http://www.newsweek.com/fall-royal-fortune-138375
The history of Prince Bernhard, cofounder of Bilderberg, WWF and the 1001 Club, is filled with corruption. Prince Bernhard was heavily involved in the international weapons trade. Even before that he worked for a subsidiary of the notorious Nazi/Rockfeller/Ford company - IG Farben.
At the beginning of the 1950s, Bernhard was trading weapons to Indonesia and tried to stage a coup, he also tried in vain to exchange devaluated Dutch-Indonesian banknotes, which would’ve cost the Dutch tax payer 50 million guilders.
Bernhard received some 2 million dollar from the American corporations Lockheed and Northrop. After this was found out he could even keep the money (but promised to donate this to a good cause...), the chairman of the commission that investigated was a mister A.M. Donner (see below for more on his sone Piet Hein Donner): http://theunhivedmind.com/UHM/prince-be ... nferences/
At one time Willem-Alexander (then Crown Prince) was on the board of directors of the Dutch central bank (DNB).
It was “democratically” decided that the tax payers had to buy the DNB, for much more than the market value (while the Dutch Royal family still decides what happens).
They also “democratically” had their palaces “sold” for much more than the market price, while only the Royal family are allowed to live in these palaces.
In another great example of “democracy”, it was decided that the Dutch taxpayers gave a yacht to Princess Beatrix for a birthday present - the Groene Draeck.
For many years the yearly maintenance costs for the Groene Draeck cost the tax payer 95,000 euro per year. Experts say that the yearly maintenance costs for such a ship are about 32,500 euro.
From 2004 to 2015 alone, the Dutch taxpayer paid 1.5 million Euro on maintenance for the boat (for which 2 boats could have been bought). It is apparently very difficult to find out where this surplus money went: http://www.theroyalforums.com/tag/groene-draeck/
According to PM Mark Rutte (who studied history in Leiden with then Prins Pils Willem-Alexander) there is no reason at all to make changes in the arrangement of the maintenance of the Groene Draeck.
For some reason, an independent investigation isn’t be supported by our wonderful (puppet) politicians (in Dutch): http://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/06/02/ond ... e-a1406807
In May 2015, the Public Prosecutor charged an Arab Muslim with insulting our King for a fine of 500 Euro, because on 16 November 2014 he had said “Fuck the King” (Fuck de Koning). The complete insulting text was: “Fuck the king, fuck the queen, fuck the royal family”.
Then something strange happened…
“Fuck the King” became a popular expression amongst the Dutch public.
On 7 May 2015, “Fuck the King” was sprayed on the stolen Amsterdam “Palace” on the Dam (stolen by the Dutch Royal family, who promised to give it back...).
On 28 May 2015, the Public Prosecutor withdrew the charges against this activist…
The Prosecutor said to accept the defence that the royal family had been involved in slavery: https://nltimes.nl/2015/05/28/prosecuti ... -king-case
On 30 April 2013, at the coronation of King Willem-Alexander at the Dam in Amsterdam, 2 protesting Republicans were locked up (taken hostage) for 2 hours – Joanna van der Hoek and Hans Maessen.
Joanna held up a sign with the text “I am not a subject”.
Before the festivities, 12 photos (including of Joanna) had been given to the patrolling cops. Eleven of these “dangerous” people (including Erwin Lensink?!?) had to be removed from the Dam ASAP; Joanna was on the 12th picture...
Mayor of Amsterdam and lawyer Eberhard van der Laan (now burning in hell…) confirmed that locking up Joanna and Hans was inappropriate. Van der Laan claimed that Hans was erroneously seen as one of the 11 “dangerous” people.
See Joanna with her sign “I am not a subject”.
Joanna, had earlier been detained in Utrecht when (then) Queen Beatrix visited, and she held up a sign with: “It is 2013”.
At that time, the police and Mayor of Utrecht Aleid Wolfsen also confirmed that locking her up had been illegal (in Dutch): https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2013/05/14/po ... n-a1434764
Joanna tried to get some media attention, and claimed to be handled too rough by the cops.
After she was released, incorrigible Joanna went back to the Dam with her sign, but cops forbade her (in Dutch): http://socialisme.nu/blog/nieuws/35389/ ... d-gemaakt/
Gepke de Leef was born in 1956 and functioned “normal” until 2006 (with a steady job for 34 years). In 2006 she became disabled after being abused by the police - including a “vaginal inspection”. Gepke was made homeless by the Dutch government in 2008.
Gepke has repeatedly been put in jail after being fined by the police and not being able to pay these tickets.
Gepke has repeatedly been tortured by sadistic psychiatrists , not only with antipsychotics but also with electroshocks (ECT). In the Netherlands some 700 people per year are tortured with electroshocks.
Gepke was sentenced for her website, on which she names the policemen and psychiatrists that have tortured her. Because she has refused to change her website, she can be locked up at any time by the police (lijfsdwang).
Here is the court order of 1 April 2014 (no joke) where Gepke was sentenced for her website; including imprisonment and a fine in money of 1000 euro per week (in Dutch): http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inzien ... :2014:1104
The Dutch court admitted that Gepke was unlawfully locked up for 68 days in 2006. For this she got awarded compensation in damages of 5217 euro (including costs for attorney of 357 euro). Usually attorneys demand much more money, but if we follow the 357 euro from the court judgement of 29 March 2007, Gepke got 4860 euro or 71.47 euro per day or 3 euro per hour of being unlawfully locked up.
Gepke was smashed against a car by the police, which led to the following injury.
Gepke de Leef has been handled so roughly by the police in October 2013 that she’s sitting in a wheelchair since. Because of this abuse her legs have gotten infected. As she is homeless this has deteriorated which could make her lose her legs.
Gepke continues to protest, and by her own account sits daily protesting in her wheelchair in front of the police department Hoofddorp.
On her own website (no longer active) Gepke in particular pointed at the Nazi history of the Dutch Royal family, and of the family Donner. Piet Hein Donner is a former Minister and currently vice-chairman of the Raad van State (chaired by King Willem-Alexander).
She also claims that she was robbed out of the inheritance of her father by a nurse with the cooperation of the Rabobank.
Her website was deleted. A lot of it has been copy-pasted here, but without the comments on the Dutch Royal family and Donner (in Dutch): https://onrecht.wordpress.com/de-zaak-gepke-de-leef/
None of these “activists” have exposed the ritual child abuse by the Dutch elite.
In the Netherlands, sexual abuse by the elite was already commonplace some hundred years ago at the Round House in Nunspeet of Frank van Vloten. Prince Hendrik (husband of Queen Wilhelmina) was a regular guest at the Round House.
In 1916, the corpse of a girl was found there. In 1917 another dead girl was found.
Around 1924, three corpses of girls were found during a police investigation. This investigation was stopped from higher up. Bones were excavated here around 1982.
The Dutch author Frederik van Eeden from 1886 to 1907 was married to Frank's sister Martha van Vloten. With financial support from Frank, Van Eeden set up the Walden colony (a commune). When he divorced Martha; that was also the end of Walden.
In 1950 the book "The Round House" by Michael Sadleir was published, this has disappeared (also from the history books).
J.W. Montenberg reported on what a lieutenant of well-to-do family told him about paedophilia in the Round House around 1921 and researched further. In 1980 Montenberg was harassed by the BVD that had his archive confiscated: http://www.place4free.com/Hiddenworld/Hidden133.htm
(archived here: http://archive.is/DnqAw)
Wim Klinkenberg also had some reports on the “Ronde huis”.
In Klinkenberg’s book “Prins Bernhard – een politieke biografie” no information on paedophilia however (in Dutch): http://crashrecovery.org/daily/14.12.20 ... 01986).pdf
In the following video, disbarred attorney Anne Marie van Blijenburgh tells that she was present at parties in the Netherlands where children from child detention centres were brutally raped and murdered.
Some of the notable guests present at these “parties”.
Mabel Wisse Smit (Friso’s wife);
An elderly man (probably) George Soros;
Piet Hein Donner;
PM Mark Rutte;
Geert Wilders (the Dutch politician with the most media attention);
Ernst Hirsch Ballin (former Minister);
Gerlof Leistra (journalist of Elsevier magazine);
Carla Eradus (President of the Court in Amsterdam).
There’s also a video of Toos Nijenhuis who testified that she was present at similar child sacrifice ceremonies (including paedophilia) in the presence of Prince Bernhard and Joseph Ratzinger (better known as the resigned pope Benedictus).
The video is difficult to watch because she doesn’t speak English very well and it’s not subtitled. Following is a 16:37 part of the complete video (where she names Prince Bernhard): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A1o1Egi20c
Tomorrow, 21 March, a “referendum” is staged on the Dutch Law for the intelligence agencies “Wet op de Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdiensten”,
According to Article 21 of the “Wet op de Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdiensten”, the AIVD and MIVD can engage in any criminal activity and infiltrate in any criminal organisation (the translation is mine)…
(in Dutch): http://maxius.nl/wet-op-de-inlichtingen ... /artikel211.
The services are authorised to:
a. employ natural persons, whether or not undercover of an assumed identity or capacity, which are the responsibility of an intelligence service:
1 °. to collect information about persons and organisations that may be of importance to an intelligence service;
2 °. to promote or take measures to protect the interests of an intelligence service.
b. establish and deploy legal entities to support operational activities.
The natural person, referred to in the first paragraph, under a, may also be instructed by the intelligence service to carry out actions that result in cooperation with a criminal offense or commit a criminal offense. An instruction as referred to in the first sentence is only given if the proper execution performance of the task of the intelligence service or the safety of the natural person involved so requires.
By or pursuant to a general Order in Council, on the recommendation of the relevant Ministers and Our Minister of Security and Justice jointly, further rules may be laid down with regard to:
a. the conditions under which and the cases in which, in order to execute an instruction by a natural person as referred to in the first paragraph, part a, actions may be carried out which may result in cooperation in the commission of a criminal offense, or commit a criminal offense;
In the Netherlands what is called a “referendum” is really a “poll”.
In the Netherlands a landslide voted against the EU/Ukraine association agreement, with a 61% against, 39% for.
King Willem-Alexander went ahead as if nothing happened because he has no reason at all to repect his subjects: http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/ ... ree-travel