Oddities of British Government

Discussion on creating and maintaining Conflicts of Law
User avatar
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: The Queen’s SERCO

Post by Firestarter »

In 2006, Serco was awarded the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) contract to manage their Pre-Grant Publication (PGPubs) Classification Services.
On 18 March 2013, Serco Inc. announced that they had processed their 2 millionth patent application for the USPTO.

Since 2006, Serco’s PGPubs team has decided on all patent applications in the USA.
In this way, Serco controls American innovation and can steal any patent that they want. The British-controlled US government has made it possible for Queen Elizabeth and her cronies to steal intellectual property.

Serco can even decide what patents may be an issue of “national security” and thus confiscated and weaponised by the US Department of Defense or the Central Intelligence Agency (and/or its British counterparts): https://geopolitics.co/2018/11/01/the-d ... heres-how/

The following video shows how powerful SERCO really is (relatively short – 5:34).
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: US presidents - related to Royal families

Post by Firestarter »

I’ve earlier posted on basically all US presidents directly descending from the British royal degenerates, just like you would expect for the Governor-General in a British Crown colony: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=748&start=10#p5188

Donald J. Trump descends from the 14th century Knight of the Garter John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, and his wife Katherine Swynford. John of Gaunt’s father was King Edward III.
See a picture of John of Gaunt with the Knight of the Garter emblem.

Hillary Clinton also descends from King Edward III, which makes Donald and Hillary 19th cousins: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... stors.html

President Donald also descends (through his mother) from King James IV of Scotland.
King James IV’s father was King Christian I of Denmark, Norway and Sweden, who was also the father of the wife (and sister) of King James IV, Queen Margaret of Scotland.

Trump is also a direct descendant of Hakon V King of Norway. Trump is a descendant of Hakon’s only legitimate daughter, Ingebjørg Håkonsdatter Princess of Sweden; the mother of King Magnus of Norway and Sweden.

Donald is also related to Queen Margrethe II of Denmark: https://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/cult ... _and_dani/
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Her Majesty’s human rights organisations

Post by Firestarter »

Have you ever wondered why Amnesty International does nothing against the enormous crimes against humanity in the British Empire?!? While for some reason critics of the British Empire so very often become human rights violators (according to Amnesty International propaganda).
It shouldn’t surprise anybody really that Amnesty International is controlled by British Intelligence!

Amnesty International is a clone of the US National Endowment for Democracy, which was already working for the State Department before Amnesty International was founded.
In 1963, the British Foreign Office wrote to overseas missions to offer “discreet support” for Amnesty International: discreet, because its credibility would have been undermined by a public endorsement.

Co-founder of Amnesty International, lawyer Peter Benenson, had strong ties to the British Foreign Office and Colonial Office. During WW II, he worked as a cryptographer at the Bletchley Park code-breaking centre.
Benenson worked as an undercover spy under the cover of Amnesty International, directly sponsored by The Crown. In 1964, the British Foreign Office helped Benenson get a visa to Haiti. The Foreign Office wrote to its Haiti representative Alan Elgar that it “support[ed] the aims of Amnesty International”.
Minister of State Walter Padley told Benenson before he left that “We shall have to be a little careful not to give the Haitians the impression that your visit is actually sponsored by Her Majesty’s Government”.

In 1966, Peter Benenson created quite a stir when he admitted that Amnesty International was infiltrated by British intelligence and called for its headquarters to be moved to another country. This was followed by claims that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the US was also involved in Amnesty International.

In 1966, Amnesty International general secretary Robert Swann and Benenson suppressed the report on British torture at the Ras Morbut interrogation centre in the British colony Aden (a port city in present-day Yemen).
Prisoners were stripped naked, placed on poles that entered their anus, had their genitals twisted, cigarettes burned on their face, and were kept in cells where faeces and urine covered the floor.

Due to its meddling in Kashmir, former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1990 demanded a ban of Amnesty International in Kashmir.
CTD Advisors that pleaded for foreign intervention in Kashmir was infested with (former) British intelligence chiefs. Perhaps the best-known member of CTD Advisors is none other than former PM of the UK Theresa May.

The recent report of Amnesty International on Darfur shows once again that Amnesty International is an extension of the British Government.

Amnesty International is also heavily funded by the US government.

Francis Boyle, as member of the board of Amnesty International USA at the end of the 1980s and early 1990s, drafted the US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, which was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.
Boyle has admitted that the “Iraqi soldiers dumping children from incubators in Kuwait” hoax couldn’t have worked without the publicity of Amnesty International.

In the 1960s and 70s, the Israeli government founded the Israel branch of Amnesty International (that is still working its magic in keeping the Palestinian conflict going). Amnesty’s local branch was controlled by Israeli intelligence: https://greatgameindia.com/amnesty-inte ... elligence/
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Her Majesty’s human rights organisations

Post by Firestarter »

None other than the same George Soros that’s oh so close to the British and Dutch Royal degenerates, is a major funder of Anglo-American intelligence front Amnesty International and the other infamous “human rights” organisation Human Rights Watch.

Then there is another (not nearly as famous!) “human rights” organisation called Oxfam. The British Government donated 20 million Pounds to its direct partner Oxfam from 2002 to 2005.
The second largest donors of Human Rights Watch is Oxfam (that’s behind black George).

Oxfam (like Amnesty International) has been fomenting unrest in Kashmir.
In 2003, Oxfam India started the so-called Violence Mitigation and Amelioration Project (VMAP) to blame the Indian Government for all sorts of human rights violations.

To make it a full circle…
Oxfam is in turn associated to the Unitarian Universalist Holdeen India Program (UUHIP) from Boston, Massachusetts, which supports groups that defend human rights in India (located outside India?).
Global partners of the UUHIP include British-controlled Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch: https://www.dharmadispatch.in/commentar ... university

Continuing on Anglo-Dutch operative George Soros, “defending” human rights (abuses).
No less than 6 judges on the ECHR have worked for Soros’ Open Society Foundations.

That’s besides the large number of judges, who have worked for Soros-funded organisations Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the A.I.R.E. Centre, Helsinki committees, International Commission of Jurists, and Interights. For example, among the former associates of the OSF, six judges were members of the board of national Open Society Foundations or of the Open Society Justice Initiative in New York: https://aclj.org/human-rights/exposing- ... hts-part-1

To finish this post…
Some information on the role Amnesty International plays in orchestrating the Belarus protest: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2485

I’m just glad that nobody is “shocked” by Amnesty International – front for Anglo-American intelligence under the guise of defending “human rights”.
The world is shocked by images and reports exposing police using brutal violence against peaceful protestors as the Belarusian authorities wage a vicious crackdown on their own citizens. Sign the petition demanding that the police violence ends now.
Right now, thousands of ordinary Belarusian people have taken to the streets across the country to protest what they see as a rigged presidential election, after the incumbent Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s claimed a landslide victory on 9 August.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/eu ... a/belarus/

President Aleksandr Lukashenko was elected to office in 1994, and since that time his government has been authoritarian. The Belarusian government has cracked down on opposition leaders and movements, and abused civil rights to freedom of assembly and association.

In August, Amnesty International staged protests in front of the Belarus Embassy in Brussels.
https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/1277 ... -brussels/

Wonderful isn’t it?!? Lukashenko evil, Boris and Donald good (please don’t mention the Queen, who’s such a “sweet” old lady)!
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Her Majesty’s human rights organisations

Post by Firestarter »

The obvious result of Anglo-American intelligence controlling human rights organisations is that what is labelled “defending democracy” in the British Empire and its allies is called “police abuse” in countries controlled by its enemies.

I specifically looked for information (and found) on Anglo-American intelligence front Amnesty International from the Executive Intelligence Review of Lyndon LaRouche.

The first piece is from 1981.

From 1963 until 1974, Sean MacBride was chairman of Amnesty International, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize for “peace” in 1974.
MacBride was also an executive committee member of the Pan-European Union that was founded and headed by Knight of Malta Otto von Hapsburg, who later started the notorious “right wing” Mont Pelerin Society.

Amnesty International’s National Advisory Council at the time included:
Zbigniew Brzezinski, who wrote the “technocratic” blueprint for Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission before swapping places with Henry Kissinger to become Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser.

William F. Buckley, Jr., of Skull & Bones, who in 1951 started working for the CIA: https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1981 ... _brita.pdf

William Buckley was not only a member of the Mont Pelerin Society but also a close friends of Von Habsburg.
In 1966, William F. Buckley played an important role in founding the World Anti-Communist League (WACL) in South Korea.

William Buckley was also a board member of Conrad Black's Hollinger International: viewtopic.php?f=31&t=1132&p=5918#p5918

The following is from 1995 and details the network involved in overthrowing the government of Sudan.

Amnesty International was formed in 1961 as a specialised British intelligence agency to selectively target Third World nations into submission of British imperialism.
Amnesty´s founders included David Astor (long-time editor of the London Observer) and former British intelligence Thailand specialist Robert Swann.
Amnesty International’s first major targets included President Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana and Prime Minister Antonio de Oliveira Salazar of Portugal (whose African empire Britain wanted to take over).

Oxfam was already formed in 1941. It is a highly secretive British intelligence organisation which fosters insurgencies under the guise of food relief.

The World Council of Churches (WCC) is one of the largest funders and conduits of British operations against Sudan. The WCC always works closely with Amnesty International and the media.
At the end of the 1960s, the WCC became one of the major funders of the World Wildlife Fund-managed African "liberation movements", like the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola, the Mozambique Liberation Front, and the Pan African Congress, which have kept Africa embroiled in warfare.

The Lutheran World Federation was formed in 1948 in the Netherlands and is housed at the WCC's headquarters in Geneva.
Has repeatedly supplied arms to the Sudanese People's Liberation Army (SPLA).

Doctors without Borders has been active in southern Sudan since 1979.
According to local sources, Doctors without Borders was involved with the SPLA in overseeing gold mining in southern Sudan to fund arms purchases.

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF, formerly the World Wildlife Fund) created the Kidepo and Nimuli national parks, directly on the Ugandan border with Sudan, for training grounds and safe havens for the SPLA guerrillas.

Overseas Development Administration (ODA) was directed by Baroness Chalker, the handler of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni. Uganda has been used to start wars all over the region for its British overlords, including Rwanda, Sudan and Zaire.
Baroness Chalker has even defended the massacre of an estimated 8,000 Hutu refugees at the Kibeho refugee camp in Rwanda at 22 April 1995 by the Rwandan Patriotic Front.

The US National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was formed in 1941 (like Oxfam) in New York from networks deployed by British Security Coordinator Sir William Stephenson. The NED has funded substantial amounts to the Sudanese opposition located in Britain.

From the end of World War II to 1977, Freedom House was chaired by Leo Cherne, who later became vice chairman of president Bush Sr.’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.
Freedom House under the wings of the NED publishes an annual rating system of “free” nations. In 1995, Sudan and Iraq were listed as the least-free of all 191 nations rated.

In 1994 alone, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) provided $92 million in "humanitarian assistance" to NGOs operating in Sudan: https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1995 ... _sudan.pdf
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Quarter of million abused in New Zealand

Post by Firestarter »

I've previously posted about the rampant child abuse in British colonies Canada and Australia...

It has been officially confirmed that in British colony New Zealand an estimated quarter of a million people, mostly children, were abused in the state "care" system and Christian institutions between 1950 and 1999.
Probably the real number is even higher.

This is a whopping amount in a country of 5 million, of which 5% were abused by these institutions.
Especially as the majority of abuse victims are Maori that were stolen from their families into state abuse care. Maori are only 16% of the total population...

Almost 70% of the children in the "care" system are Maori. If 70% of the abuse victims were Maori, 175,000, while the Maori are 800,000 in total, more than 20% of the Maori suffer from abuse by these wonderful institutions.
See a Māori protest against Oranga Tamariki (a local state "care" institution) for stealing their children.

The abuse included:
Sexual abuse;
Physical abuse;
Vaginal examinations;
Electric shock treatment (as punishment);
Drugging (as punishment);
Solitary confinement (as punishment).

Some 256,000 people were abused, or almost 40% of the 655,000 people in "care". The 1970s and 1980s is the periode when most abuse occurred.
The intermediary report by the royal commission was released last month and concluded that most were abused over a 5- to 10-year period. The final report is expected to be held back until January 2023.

For some reason they forgot to report on current ongoing abuse: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... uiry-finds

From 1950 to 1992, more than 100,000 children in New Zealand (population 5 million) were stolen from their families and placed into state "care" (including foster homes, orphanages and psychiatric hospitals). Many children were locked up in these institutions for minor offences like stealing a pencil or skipping school.
The New Zealand government has apologised to over 1,000 victims and paid out NZ$17 million as a "compensation" for this government orchestrated abuse.

More than 40% of the prisoners in New Zealand were placed in these state-run institutions as a child.
From some boys’ homes no less than 80% end up in prison as adults.

Grant West, an abuse survivor from the notorious Epuni boys home received an apology from the Ministry of Social Development and a compensation payment of NZ$40,000.
West explained:
They put us into a basketball team but it wasn’t a basketball team — it was for us kids to be taken out and prostituted to men on the outside. I went on to be abused in a foster home, and by a leader of the Salvation Army — all people [who] were supposed to be helping me.
https://home.crin.org/readlistenwatch/s ... land-story

The royal commission for some reason forgot to report on more recent child abuse in New Zealand's child "care". The following shows that massive child abuse continued into 2018.
In only 6 months in 2018, 227 children were abused after being stolen from their family by the Oranga Tamariki.

The 336 total "findings of harm" for these 227 children included:
Physical abuse - 182 children;
Sexual abuse - 36 children.

Most of the sexual abuse occurred by non-governmental organisation, and in group homes or non-family foster homes, by approved "caregivers": https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/111266 ... re-in-2018

The following information suggests that the royal commission was actually a cover-up (of the ongoing abuse, elite Catholic involvement and/or ritual sacrifices?).

Child victim Dr. Christopher Longhurst has been molested by officials of the Catholic Church and was concerned that the Catholic commission members Sir Anand Satyanand and Andrew Erueti would try to cover-up the guilt of the Catholic church.

See Sir Anand.

He was especially concerned with inquiry chairman Anand and asked if he was associated with senior Catholic clergy and had talked to church officials about the commission's "investigation". The presiding Judge Coral Shaw quickly shut down the questions by Longhurst.

Longhurst, who later got an apology while Anand resigned, explained why he thought his questions were relevant:
Therefore, if I was disclosing to a person - who was a friend of a person who was protecting the institution that abused me - it would be a conflict of interest, and I've never met another person who wouldn't share that view.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/386 ... -shut-down

At one point the victims found out that the partner of one of the advisory group members, who attended several meetings, is a convicted paedophile.
It took 3 weeks before this person was forced to step down from the advisory group: https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/the-de ... se-inquiry
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Oddities of British Government

Post by Firestarter »

Wouldn't you know that the "oldest democracy in the world" is really a dictatorship, ruled by the House of Windsor...

Ministers notify Queen Elizabeth in a secretive procedure of draft parliamentary bills on anything she is interested in and ask for her orders on how to debate them.
Buckingham Palace confirmed that Elizabeth's consent is needed on draft laws that affect "the Queen personally, whether as an individual or as a land owner or employer". This is just about everything isn't it?!?

At least 1,062 parliamentary bills have been vetted by Elizabeth or Crown Prince Charles before they were approved by the UK’s members of parliament, since the beginning of Elizabeth II’s reign.

Members of the British royal family can seal their will, unlike any other family in Britain, ensuring that their private wealth (of trillions?) remains a secret.
Elizabeth ordered her ministers to change a 1970s transparency law so she could conceal her wealth from the public: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... ns-consent
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
Post Reply