Elon Musk, Technocracy and the New World Order

[Firestarter]

Most stories I read about the future of the technocratic surveillance state I find boring, often they focus on the lack of democracy in a so-called “technate”. These stories are almost like an advertisement for the game of politrics in which we lose no matter who we vote for…

I think that AI in itself is mostly a buzzword that is an exaggeration of what it really is. The algorithms that decide how AI works need to be programmed by humans, so in reality the “learning” capabilities are severely limited.
What computers excel in, and do much better than humans, is “analysing” huge amounts of data, and quick decision making.

The essay describes how AI will change warfare and surveillance of us proles. It also details the collaboration between the private tech companies and the government military and surveillance apparatus (the so-called public private partnership).

https://jameshfetzer.org/2025/02/the-in ... rmageddon/
(https://archive.is/qVCqm)


I think that the most important thing missing from the essay on AI, is the already happening combination of surveillance by intelligence agencies and the use of legal and illegal ways to control the herd. I’m thinking about microwave weapons, voice-2-skull and directed energy weapons, in particular.

The reason that voice-2-skull radio waves are so effective in combination with complete surveillance, is that the computer gets immediate feedback on the latest brainwashing experiments.
Directed energy weapons are of course used against dissidents, and useless eaters, both as a way to prevent revolution, and to cull the herd.

It looks like these 5G towers, with these huge power cables, were actually designed as directed energy weapons, and this proves beyond a reasonable doubt that 5G towers can be used to attack individuals with radiation

viewtopic.php?p=86694#p86694

[Firestarter]

For many conspiracy theorists the elderly chairman of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, became the top villain in the world during the plandemic. Schwab was forced to step down amidst corruption allegations (using WEF money for himself and family). The new WEF interim chairman, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, who’s also old, looks destined to become as hated as Schwab.
Brabeck-Letmathe has been part of the Attali Commission, set up by the corrupt then French President Nicolas Sarkozy in June 2007, and chaired by new world order lunatic Jacques Attali.

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is arguably best known as the former chairman of the Swiss food multinational Nestlé.
His comments in 2005 on the peasants not having a “right to water” have become quite controversial:
.

Water is, of course, the most important raw material we have today in the world. It’s a question of whether we should privatize the normal water supply for the population. And there are two different opinions on the matter.
The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. The other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value.
Personally, I believe it's better to give a foodstuff a value so that we're all aware it has its price, and then that one should take specific measures for the part of the population that has no access to this water, and there are many different possibilities there.

.
What makes this so controversial is that big corporations have indeed been taking water from places where the poor don’t have enough, and sell the water for a profit: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nestl ... man-right/


In Ontario, Canada, Nestlé extracts up to 3.6 million litres of water daily from Six Nations treaty land.
The Six Nations don’t have (enough) clean drinking water: https://www.theguardian.com/global/2018 ... ning-water


In Bhati Dilwan, Pakistan, children get sick from filthy water. Nestlé seems to blame, digging a deep well that deprives them of potable water.

The water is not only very dirty, but the water level sank from 100 to 300 to 400 feet.

.
According to former UN chief advisor for water issues Maude Barlow:

When a company like Nestlé comes along and says, Pure Life is the answer, we’re selling you your own ground water while nothing comes out of your faucets anymore or if it does it’s undrinkable – that’s more than irresponsible, that’s practically a criminal act.

The UN is of course an active participant in these criminal acts…

In 2003, Nestlé installed a water treatment facility for $750,000 in a refugee camp in Ethiopia, but in 2005 pulled out, and water shortages returned.

In Lagos, Nigeria, families have to spend up to half their budget on water in canisters, and those who can afford it drink Nestlé’s Pure Life.

In the US state of Maine, communities are fighting Nestlé because it pumps massive amounts of ground water and spring water: https://worldcrunch.com/business-financ ... ed-brands/
(https://archive.is/DcTGw)

-------------------------

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe’s other (former) gigs include board memberships at Roche, Credit Suisse, L’Oréal, Exxon Mobil, and Salt Mobile SA, and founding chairman of the 2030 Water Resources Group, a public-private water management partnership within the World Bank.
When I think of “water management”, apparently one of the main focuses of Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, I can only think of one “expert”, our beloved king Willem-Alexander…


In 2006, Willem-Alexander decided to become chair of the UN Secretary-General's Advisory Board on Water and Sanitation (UNSGAB): https://web.archive.org/web/20231117090 ... nvestiture


In 2009, Willem Alexander published the report “Charting our Water Future”, the blueprint for the 2030 Water Resources Group: https://web.archive.org/web/20240616230 ... 0final.pdf


From 22 to 24 March 2023, the International Water Conference took place at the UN headquarters in New York. King of the Netherlands Willem-Alexander was one of the presidents on 22 March: https://web.archive.org/web/20241211034 ... rence-2023

.

One of the first institutions to highlight Monbiot’s Natural Climate Solutions launch was the Food and Land Use Coalition, initiated by Paul Polman and none other than Mark Malloch Brown (there he is again!!).

.
In 2006, Brabeck-Letmathe hired Polman as Nestlé’s chief financial officer, who from 2009 to 2019 was selected as Unilever CEO.
See Paul Polman (left) with Nestle's CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe in Switzerland, 22 February 2007.



It looks like Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is just as controlled by the Dutch royals as Klaus Schwab, Polman and the WEF…

WEF chairman Klaus Schwab was also a Bilderberg steering committee member. He became a Bilderberg steering committee member in 1971, at about the same time he started the European Management Forum (that has since evolved into the World Economic Forum).

My conclusion is that the WEF is effectively a subsidairy of the Dutch royals controlled Bilderberg Group (implementing the depopulation green agenda as we speak)

viewtopic.php?p=74706#p74706

[Firestarter]

The future of our technocratic brave new world is institutionalised automated tyranny where algorithms control all aspects of our life - an “algocracy”.
In an algocracy, unelected developers and corporate contractors create algorithms, which will decide on our health, freedom, mobility and privacy based on some sort of social credit score. If the computer says you’re guilty, you ARE of course, because the machine is never wrong.

In early 2025, President Trump signed the executive order ‘Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence’, which revoked prior AI safeguards, eliminated bias audits and instructed government agencies to prioritise “innovation” over ethics.
The order encourages federal agencies to adopt AI quickly, especially in areas like policing and surveillance, under the guise of “efficiency”.

President Trump buried a 10-year ban on AI regulation within the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which strips state and local governments of the ability to impose guardrails on artificial intelligence until 2035! Giving the federal government the authority to implement AI to efficiently control every sphere of our life, from law enforcement and employment to healthcare, education, and digital surveillance.
Algorithms to decide on policing, welfare eligibility, immigration vetting, job recruitment, credit, judicial risk assessments and much more, without inefficient… human mercy.

AI is of course already used to flag families for potential child neglect based on predictive models using data from Medicaid, mental health, jail and housing records to steal children from their loving parents and traffic them into the foster care system: https://expose-news.com/2025/05/30/gove ... s-of-life/


Robert F. Kennedy Jr as secretary of health (HHS) gives “alternative” healthcare a bad name.
In the overlong MAHA report, scientific studies were cited that didn’t exist, while conclusions were made that weren’t backed up with the existing studies referenced, and worst of all the report was written using AI.
Apparently Bobby plans to use AI to make healthcare eugenics again: https://archive.is/Ne6lc

[Firestarter]

While I don’t follow Mozilla’s conclusion that modern cars are even worse for our privacy than smart phones that people carry with them at all times, it sure is troubling how much information ALL modern cars (with computers, smart technology) collect about us…
Apparently it’s not just electric cars, but every modern car (as ALL have computer and internet access).

Every single one of the 25 car brands evaluated collects personal data not needed for operating the car.
Cars collect personal information though: cameras (what a “surprise”!), connected services, car’s app (which uses the phone), and gathers even more information from third party sources like Sirius XM or Google Maps.

Even more troubling is that they collect your medical information (knowing when you go to the doctor?!?), genetic information, what songs you listen to, and even your … “sex life” (no joke!)…
Nissan details collecting information on your “sexual activity”, while Kia also mentions they can collect information about your “sex life” in their privacy policy.
Six car companies collect your “genetic information” or “genetic characteristics” (how they do this isn’t clear…).

Tesla (surprise, surprise…) was the worst privacy violator of all these brands. Of course Musk also has access to your Twitter/X account, and has been mining government data through DOGE.
https://youtu.be/lwBS41BfT7Y

Of course passengers in your car somehow also automatically consent to the car company collecting personal information.

Car brands also share and/or sell this data (84%) with service providers, data brokers, and other businesses.
Car brands also share your information with the government or law enforcement (56%) after an informal “request” (no court order needed of course…): https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/pr ... r-privacy/

---------------------------

Much scarier than a car company finding out about your sex life, is the possibility that self-driving cars hijack the car of whistleblowers or dissidents and drive them off a cliff or into a lake after which the Tesla’s doors refuse to open making it into a death trap.

The following 2 articles are the best information I found on hacking an “autonomous vehicle” most of the described strategies are more about “confusing” the computer than an actual hijacking that could be used to crash the car when a human is driving it.

This includes “an attacker can use CAN to suddenly brake the vehicle or malfunction the brake pedal in the ECU area” (which could be used to crash a car): https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022orlando/249.pdf


This describes, “If you get to one control unit – like the entertainment system, for example – then with some reverse engineering you could control the steering wheel”.

And in another example “locked the brakes”: https://physicsworld.com/a/how-to-hack- ... iving-car/


If this would happen, Tesla would want to hide information on crashes from the public…
After the Washington Post filed a lawsuit to get Tesla crash data from the US National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Tesla asked a judge to reject this demand: https://archive.is/UwoN0

[Firestarter]

For years I’ve been warning that left or right, the technocratic open prison is being implemented. It also seems to me that the Trump II administration is implementing this diabolical plan even faster than previous US administrations (no doubt followed by the rest of our brave new world).
One of the key areas in which Big Brother wants to monitor and control us is healthcare to Make it Eugenics again…
Now the corrupt eco-fascist US Secretary of Health (HHS) RFK Jr is spearheading an effort to get us all to wear digital “wearables” so that Big Brother can monitor everything about us, for our health of course. I guess that AI will predict and sentence us to (future) diseases, and send us to Bobby’s health farms (for our own good of course).
“My vision is that every American is wearing a wearable within four years”.

Some of these “wearables” will actually be implanted in/on your skin (monitoring glucose levels). Like chip implants?!?
Some techpharma (?) companies no doubt will collect millions (or even billions). The shares of DexCom and Abbott Laboratories rose considerably. Of course members of the Trump II administration have ties to wearables businesses.


President Trump’s surgeon general, Casey Means, co-founded health-monitoring company Levels Health, which has partnered with DexCom. Andreessen Horowitz invested in Levels.
Casey’s well-connected brother, Calley Means, is a top adviser to Kennedy.
https://youtu.be/1zRfq7IId5Y
https://archive.is/UWLXW


See from left, Chris Palmer, Marty Makary, Casey Means, Senator Ron Johnson, RFK Jr., Calley Means, Vani Hari, Courtney Swan, Mikhaila Fuller, Jordan Peterson, and Jason Karp, June 2024.


Calley’s father, Grady Means, was an assistant to Vice President Nelson Rockefeller in the 1970s.

Calley Means, while still a student at Stanford, worked as a White House Intern, at the Heritage Foundation, “consultant” at Booz Allen Hamilton, and contributor to “strategy” for John McCain.
After graduating from Stanford in 2008, aged 23, Calley worked for 2 years at the Mercury of Trump’s 2016 campaign manager Paul Manafort.
These days, Calley is active in groups like the CFR, Teneo, and Stand Together (founded by Charles Koch).
.

Teneo’s annual retreat brings together such luminairies as - DeSantis, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Dick and Betsy DeVos, their Blackwater founder in-law Erik Prince, New York Times columnist David Brooks, federal judge Trevor McFadden, and 2024 presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy

viewtopic.php?p=81644#p81644

Reportedly about 3 hours after Trump’s bloody ear assassination was staged, Calley Means called RFK to ask him to join Trump’s team (as vice presidential candidate?!?): https://archive.is/Yj0sg


DexCom hired lobbying firm Continental Strategy, which employs Katie Wiles, the daughter of Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
DexCom invested $75 million in Oura. Finnish wearables company Oura Health has hired Ballard Partners for lobbying. Casey Means also promotes the Oura Ring: https://archive.is/z1wQ2

I already knew that there were connection between Wiles, Bondi and Florida governor DeSantis, there are a lot more interesting links to Ballard…
There are so many potential Ballard Partners scandals that I can’t really figure out which one is the worst.

viewtopic.php?p=86259#p86259

[Firestarter]

The following long essay (completely blocked by the internet search engines) shows some historic information on NATO, US, and USSR all working together to implement the green, technocratic blueprint for the worldwide technocratic open prison that has since advanced to the point that big brother knows and controls all (or very close)…
There is evidence of the USA and USSR working together with NATO for the implementation of the “green” technocratic surveillance state and even a possible motive for the assassination of president Kennedy back in 1963…
.

In 1961, Kennedy personally championed the National Library of Medicine’s modernisation, signing Public Law 87-262 to fund a new facility at the NIH and later overseeing the roll-out of MEDLARS, the first large-scale computerised retrieval system in medicine. But when proposals emerged in 1963 to expand PPBS-style data management into a National Information Center, Kennedy declined to back it. The idea stalled in congressional hearings that autumn, leaving unrealised a centralised, cross-domain data hub that would have drawn in information from across every scientific and technical sphere.
…

Only weeks after the final hearing on the National Information Center, on 22 November 1963, Kennedy was assassinated. Within days, everything changed. Johnson reversed Kennedy’s planned Vietnam withdrawal and, more importantly, began issuing executive orders in health, environmental, and financial policy — laying the foundation for the economy-wide systems data modelling that would follow.
The technocratic faction Kennedy had worked to purge was back in business — this time with no resistance from the White House. By 1965, Johnson had instituted PPBS across every branch of the administration.
…

On September 17, 1969, White House advisor Daniel Patrick Moynihan sent an internal memo that should have rocked the world upon its 2024 declassification. The memo supposedly warned about rising carbon dioxide levels — though it didn’t ultimately appear to know much (if anything at all). But what is significant is that it made a startling recommendation:
“I would think this is a subject that the Administration ought to get involved with. It is a natural for NATO. Perhaps the first order of business is to begin a worldwide monitoring system.”

Consider the implications. In 1969 — at the supposed height of the Cold War — a US official was suggesting that NATO should run global surveillance. The same NATO created to contain Soviet expansion was now being positioned to monitor the entire planet.


Within months, Nixon established the 'NATO Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society' with Moynihan as its head. The committee's mission? Global environmental monitoring in the name of protecting the planet.

When Moynihan stepped down around a year later, he was replaced by Russell E. Train. In case you never heard of him, he was one of the most connected environmental officials in American history. Train wasn't just running NATO's environmental program. He was simultaneously:
• Head of the US Council on Environmental Quality
• Co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund
• Board member of the Rockefeller-funded Conservation Foundation
• A key figure in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
In other words, Train was the American establishment's point man for turning environmentalism into policy. But the remarkable part is who he was secretly negotiating with.
…

On May 23, 1972, Train's negotiations produced the 'Agreement on Environmental Protection' between the US and USSR. The treaty called for cooperation in air pollution monitoring, climate research, and 'joint development and implementation in the fields of basic and applied sciences' — diplomatic language for shared infrastructure yielding common research output.
Think about the implications: By negotiating with dual-mandate Train, Moscow knowingly advanced NATO’s surveillance ambitions under the cover of environmental cooperation. No genuine rival would have realistically done so. This wasn't competition between rival superpowers — it was coordination between supposed adversaries building the same control system.
…

While Train and Kovda facilitated the surveillance treaty, the domestic framework was being constructed through Nelson Rockefeller.
In 1973, Nixon established the Commission on Critical Choices for Americans, putting Nelson Rockefeller in charge alongside Ford, Kissinger, and Shultz. Funded through Rockefeller’s Third Century Corporation, the study let him bankroll his own policy prescriptions — shaping everything from energy strategy and resource management to America’s role in a new global order. Conveniently, just as Brzezinski’s Trilaterial Commission came to be.
…

The 1972 US-USSR treaty wasn't really about environmental protection — it was about creating the institutional framework for global surveillance systems. As a senior member of SCOPE — the organisation tasked with designing global environmental monitoring systems — Kovda would have been fully aware of Train's dual role running NATO's global monitoring programme alongside the environmental negotiations.
Not only did Moscow knowingly cooperate with the people who were developing NATO's environmental surveillance capacity — but they even signed the dotted line on the agreement. Why would a supposed adversary agree to that? Did the USSR outmaneuver Train — or were they simply cooperating all along?
…

An alleged environmental crisis was the perfect cover story for this surveillance build-out. Who could oppose monitoring systems designed to save the planet from armageddon? Who would question international cooperation on such an obviously noble cause?

.
I don’t know how much text there is below the “paid subscribers” image: https://archive.is/XQ1P2
(https://web.archive.org/web/20250819083 ... ediscovery)


Here’s some more information on this topic from the same substack: https://web.archive.org/web/20250331150 ... eption-day https://web.archive.org/web/20250523182 ... /discovery

--------------------------------

Apparently “open source” is promoted by all the computer nerds as some sort of ultimate privacy protection. I think that the only way to protect your privacy is to not use any technology with a computer chip, as this technology has been designed for surveillance purposes…

Recently some of the best-known (most advertised) open source companies have joined forces with the UN, with one of the goals of the “UN Open Source Principles”, “8. Sustain and scale: Supporting the development of solutions that meet the evolving needs of the UN system and beyond”.
So these open source organisations are pledging to advance the one world government UN’s program.


The Linux Foundation — which makes a third of a billion dollars per year — is funded by corporate sponsors like Microsoft, Hitachi, Meta (Facebook), and Tencent.
Likewise Mozilla (bringing in over $600 million annually) is almost entirely funded by Google.

In June 2025, the UN hosted “UN Open Source Week”, with the most important organisations controlling open source, it included representatives from:
Gates Foundation, Amazon, World Bank, Wikimedia Foundation, and GitHub (that’s Microsoft): https://archive.is/QPhVD

--------------------------------
.

Schwab was forced to step down amidst corruption allegations (using WEF money for himself and family). The new WEF interim chairman, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, who’s also old, looks destined to become as hated as Schwab.

Very “surprisingly” the WEF has cleared Klaus Schwab of wrongdoing following an “investigation”.

The World Economic Forum’s interim chair Peter Brabeck-Letmathe submitted his resignation letter, complaining about its “toxic culture”.
Days later, the WEF named BlackRock chairman Larry Fink and Swiss billionaire André Hoffmann as its new interim chairs of the board: https://archive.is/HflkR

André Hoffmann is Roche vice-chair, and heir to the Roche pharmaceutical giant’s fortune, vice-president of the WWF from 2007 to 2017 (founded by Prince Bernhard and Prince Philip), member of the 1001 Club (founded by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands), steering committee member of Bilderberg (founded by Prince Bernhard), trustee of Chatham House (RIIA, the main think tank for the British royals), and member of the Club of Rome: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Hoffmann