Elon Musk, Technocracy and the New World Order

Comments about your favorite candidate, the newest PROPOSED law, and the FEMA camp near your hometown should go here.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2581
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Brave New AI World

Post by Firestarter »

Most stories I read about the future of the technocratic surveillance state I find boring, often they focus on the lack of democracy in a so-called “technate”. These stories are almost like an advertisement for the game of politrics in which we lose no matter who we vote for…

I think that AI in itself is mostly a buzzword that is an exaggeration of what it really is. The algorithms that decide how AI works need to be programmed by humans, so in reality the “learning” capabilities are severely limited.
What computers excel in, and do much better than humans, is “analysing” huge amounts of data, and quick decision making.

The essay describes how AI will change warfare and surveillance of us proles. It also details the collaboration between the private tech companies and the government military and surveillance apparatus (the so-called public private partnership).
Image
https://jameshfetzer.org/2025/02/the-in ... rmageddon/
(https://archive.is/qVCqm)


I think that the most important thing missing from the essay on AI, is the already happening combination of surveillance by intelligence agencies and the use of legal and illegal ways to control the herd. I’m thinking about microwave weapons, voice-2-skull and directed energy weapons, in particular.

The reason that voice-2-skull radio waves are so effective in combination with complete surveillance, is that the computer gets immediate feedback on the latest brainwashing experiments.
Directed energy weapons are of course used against dissidents, and useless eaters, both as a way to prevent revolution, and to cull the herd.
Firestarter wrote:It looks like these 5G towers, with these huge power cables, were actually designed as directed energy weapons, and this proves beyond a reasonable doubt that 5G towers can be used to attack individuals with radiation
viewtopic.php?p=86694#p86694
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/googl ... 090/page-6

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2581
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Brabeck-Letmathe - WEF

Post by Firestarter »

For many conspiracy theorists the elderly chairman of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, became the top villain in the world during the plandemic. Schwab was forced to step down amidst corruption allegations (using WEF money for himself and family). The new WEF interim chairman, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, who’s also old, looks destined to become as hated as Schwab.
Brabeck-Letmathe has been part of the Attali Commission, set up by the corrupt then French President Nicolas Sarkozy in June 2007, and chaired by new world order lunatic Jacques Attali.

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is arguably best known as the former chairman of the Swiss food multinational Nestlé.
His comments in 2005 on the peasants not having a “right to water” have become quite controversial:
.
Water is, of course, the most important raw material we have today in the world. It’s a question of whether we should privatize the normal water supply for the population. And there are two different opinions on the matter.
The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. The other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value.
Personally, I believe it's better to give a foodstuff a value so that we're all aware it has its price, and then that one should take specific measures for the part of the population that has no access to this water, and there are many different possibilities there.
.
What makes this so controversial is that big corporations have indeed been taking water from places where the poor don’t have enough, and sell the water for a profit: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nestl ... man-right/


In Ontario, Canada, Nestlé extracts up to 3.6 million litres of water daily from Six Nations treaty land.
The Six Nations don’t have (enough) clean drinking water: https://www.theguardian.com/global/2018 ... ning-water


In Bhati Dilwan, Pakistan, children get sick from filthy water. Nestlé seems to blame, digging a deep well that deprives them of potable water.
The water is not only very dirty, but the water level sank from 100 to 300 to 400 feet.
.
According to former UN chief advisor for water issues Maude Barlow:
When a company like Nestlé comes along and says, Pure Life is the answer, we’re selling you your own ground water while nothing comes out of your faucets anymore or if it does it’s undrinkable – that’s more than irresponsible, that’s practically a criminal act.
The UN is of course an active participant in these criminal acts…

In 2003, Nestlé installed a water treatment facility for $750,000 in a refugee camp in Ethiopia, but in 2005 pulled out, and water shortages returned.

In Lagos, Nigeria, families have to spend up to half their budget on water in canisters, and those who can afford it drink Nestlé’s Pure Life.

In the US state of Maine, communities are fighting Nestlé because it pumps massive amounts of ground water and spring water: https://worldcrunch.com/business-financ ... ed-brands/
(https://archive.is/DcTGw)

-------------------------

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe’s other (former) gigs include board memberships at Roche, Credit Suisse, L’Oréal, Exxon Mobil, and Salt Mobile SA, and founding chairman of the 2030 Water Resources Group, a public-private water management partnership within the World Bank.
When I think of “water management”, apparently one of the main focuses of Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, I can only think of one “expert”, our beloved king Willem-Alexander…


In 2006, Willem-Alexander decided to become chair of the UN Secretary-General's Advisory Board on Water and Sanitation (UNSGAB): https://web.archive.org/web/20231117090 ... nvestiture


In 2009, Willem Alexander published the report “Charting our Water Future”, the blueprint for the 2030 Water Resources Group: https://web.archive.org/web/20240616230 ... 0final.pdf


From 22 to 24 March 2023, the International Water Conference took place at the UN headquarters in New York. King of the Netherlands Willem-Alexander was one of the presidents on 22 March: https://web.archive.org/web/20241211034 ... rence-2023

.
Firestarter wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 8:26 pmOne of the first institutions to highlight Monbiot’s Natural Climate Solutions launch was the Food and Land Use Coalition, initiated by Paul Polman and none other than Mark Malloch Brown (there he is again!!).
.
In 2006, Brabeck-Letmathe hired Polman as Nestlé’s chief financial officer, who from 2009 to 2019 was selected as Unilever CEO.
See Paul Polman (left) with Nestle's CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe in Switzerland, 22 February 2007.
Image


It looks like Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is just as controlled by the Dutch royals as Klaus Schwab, Polman and the WEF…
Firestarter wrote:WEF chairman Klaus Schwab was also a Bilderberg steering committee member. He became a Bilderberg steering committee member in 1971, at about the same time he started the European Management Forum (that has since evolved into the World Economic Forum).

My conclusion is that the WEF is effectively a subsidairy of the Dutch royals controlled Bilderberg Group (implementing the depopulation green agenda as we speak)
viewtopic.php?p=74706#p74706
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/googl ... 090/page-6

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2581
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Elon Musk, Technocracy and the New World Order

Post by Firestarter »

The future of our technocratic brave new world is institutionalised automated tyranny where algorithms control all aspects of our life - an “algocracy”.
In an algocracy, unelected developers and corporate contractors create algorithms, which will decide on our health, freedom, mobility and privacy based on some sort of social credit score. If the computer says you’re guilty, you ARE of course, because the machine is never wrong.

In early 2025, President Trump signed the executive order ‘Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence’, which revoked prior AI safeguards, eliminated bias audits and instructed government agencies to prioritise “innovation” over ethics.
The order encourages federal agencies to adopt AI quickly, especially in areas like policing and surveillance, under the guise of “efficiency”.

President Trump buried a 10-year ban on AI regulation within the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which strips state and local governments of the ability to impose guardrails on artificial intelligence until 2035! Giving the federal government the authority to implement AI to efficiently control every sphere of our life, from law enforcement and employment to healthcare, education, and digital surveillance.
Algorithms to decide on policing, welfare eligibility, immigration vetting, job recruitment, credit, judicial risk assessments and much more, without inefficient… human mercy.

AI is of course already used to flag families for potential child neglect based on predictive models using data from Medicaid, mental health, jail and housing records to steal children from their loving parents and traffic them into the foster care system: https://expose-news.com/2025/05/30/gove ... s-of-life/


Robert F. Kennedy Jr as secretary of health (HHS) gives “alternative” healthcare a bad name.
In the overlong MAHA report, scientific studies were cited that didn’t exist, while conclusions were made that weren’t backed up with the existing studies referenced, and worst of all the report was written using AI.
Apparently Bobby plans to use AI to make healthcare eugenics again: https://archive.is/Ne6lc
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/googl ... 090/page-6

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2581
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Car spying and hacking

Post by Firestarter »

While I don’t follow Mozilla’s conclusion that modern cars are even worse for our privacy than smart phones that people carry with them at all times, it sure is troubling how much information ALL modern cars (with computers, smart technology) collect about us…
Apparently it’s not just electric cars, but every modern car (as ALL have computer and internet access).

Every single one of the 25 car brands evaluated collects personal data not needed for operating the car.
Cars collect personal information though: cameras (what a “surprise”!), connected services, car’s app (which uses the phone), and gathers even more information from third party sources like Sirius XM or Google Maps.

Even more troubling is that they collect your medical information (knowing when you go to the doctor?!?), genetic information, what songs you listen to, and even your … “sex life” (no joke!)…
Nissan details collecting information on your “sexual activity”, while Kia also mentions they can collect information about your “sex life” in their privacy policy.
Six car companies collect your “genetic information” or “genetic characteristics” (how they do this isn’t clear…).

Tesla (surprise, surprise…) was the worst privacy violator of all these brands. Of course Musk also has access to your Twitter/X account, and has been mining government data through DOGE.
https://youtu.be/lwBS41BfT7Y

Of course passengers in your car somehow also automatically consent to the car company collecting personal information.

Car brands also share and/or sell this data (84%) with service providers, data brokers, and other businesses.
Car brands also share your information with the government or law enforcement (56%) after an informal “request” (no court order needed of course…): https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/pr ... r-privacy/

---------------------------

Much scarier than a car company finding out about your sex life, is the possibility that self-driving cars hijack the car of whistleblowers or dissidents and drive them off a cliff or into a lake after which the Tesla’s doors refuse to open making it into a death trap.

The following 2 articles are the best information I found on hacking an “autonomous vehicle” most of the described strategies are more about “confusing” the computer than an actual hijacking that could be used to crash the car when a human is driving it.

This includes “an attacker can use CAN to suddenly brake the vehicle or malfunction the brake pedal in the ECU area” (which could be used to crash a car): https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022orlando/249.pdf


This describes, “If you get to one control unit – like the entertainment system, for example – then with some reverse engineering you could control the steering wheel”.

And in another example “locked the brakes”: https://physicsworld.com/a/how-to-hack- ... iving-car/


If this would happen, Tesla would want to hide information on crashes from the public…
After the Washington Post filed a lawsuit to get Tesla crash data from the US National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Tesla asked a judge to reject this demand: https://archive.is/UwoN0
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/googl ... 090/page-6

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
Post Reply