The fight against Newspeak

[Firestarter]

I have a hard time finding reliable information on the US/Israel war against Iran, as I don't think that Iranian propaganda is any better than Western.
Its obvious result is a huge increase in the price of energy, which will cause inflation and food shortages. Of course the Middle Eastern oil sheiks won't mind their countries being bombed as they don't care about their population, while an increase in oil prices is greatly appreciated. Similarly it could be argued that the bombing of Iran will actually make the ruthless regime of the new Ayatollah Khameini (the son of the previous that reportedly died in the bombings) more popular, while they will also benefit from the higher prices for oil on the world market.

So my first guess was that these were THE objectives of this war...
There is also a biblical aspect that could very well be an important motive for the zio-satanists in control. Although probably it's more the use of Jewish religious propaganda to motivate the Israeli masses for another (un)holy war.
.

According to a number of internet sites and books Jews are involved in bloody rituals in which white Christians are murdered by Satanic Jews. At Passover a boy of 7 years the most must be sacrificed and at Purim adults are sacrificed. The ritual at Passover has strict rules, but Purim is more a free form of genocide. George H.W. Bush ordered the mass murder of 150,000 Iraqi soldiers on February 28, 1991 (that fled from Kuwait) on Purim. Twelve years later Purim was celebrated on March 19, 2003, when George W. Bush ordered to invade Iraq.

https://lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3154#p3154

In 2026, Purim was from 2 to 4 March, 'coincidentally' when the bombs on Iran started...
So Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was eliminated on Purim!


The story of Purim in the Tanach (a.k.a. Old Testament) takes place in ancient Persia (where Iran is now located). The story centers around the evil official Haman, who plots to exterminate the Jews, but instead gets executed. Rabbinic tradition identifies Haman as a descendant of Amalek (or an Agagite).

Already in 2009, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu called Iran "Amalek", and predicted that Iran would swiftly make science fictional nuclear bombs: https://web.archive.org/web/20260323001 ... ble-enemy/


In March 2026, during a visit to a site hit by an Iranian missile, Netanyahu stated:

We read in this week's Torah portion, 'Remember what Amalek did to you.’ We remember—and we act.

.
In October 2023, Netanyahu had invoked "Amalek" in support of the brutal genocide of Gaza.
On 13 October 2023, Netanyahu stated:

Today, against the enemy, with the ancient command ‘Remember what Amalek did to you’ ringing in our ears, today we are uniting forces in order to ensure the eternity of Israel.

.
On 28 October 2023, Netanyahu told IDF soldiers:

You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible, And we do remember, and we are fighting. Our brave troops and combatants who are now in Gaza or around Gaza, and in all other regions in Israel, are joining this chain of Jewish heroes, a chain that has started 3,000 years ago from Joshua ben Nun, until the heroes of 1948, the Six-Day War, the ’73 October War and all other wars in this country.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/ne ... oe/3848109


In Jewish tradition, Amalek represents the evil archetype that hates Israel, with Haman in the Book of Esther being described as an "Agagite" (descendant of the Amalekite king Agag).
Amalek was the son of Eliphaz and grandson of Esau (Isaac's and Abraham's brother), making the Amalekites relatives of the Israelites.

The Amalekites were a tribe of nomads living in the Negev desert, between Egypt and Canaan. The Babylonians called them the Sute, Egyptians the Sittiu, and the Amarna tablets refer to them as the Khabbati, or “plunderers”.


In the Tanach, it is written that the Amalekites frequently raided and fought Israel. According to the Tanach, God ordered the Israelites to wipe the Amalekites off the face of the earth (Exodus 17:8–13; 1 Samuel 15:2; Deuteronomy 25:17).
This means that Bibi calling Iranians (or Palestinians) "Amalek" is basically calling for genocide (sort of like the endlösung?!?).

The Amalekites’ brutality toward the Israelites began with an attack at Rephidim (Exodus 17:8–13).
This is recounted in Deuteronomy 25:17–19:

Remember what the Amalekites did to you along the way when you came out of Egypt. When you were weary and worn out, they met you on your journey and attacked all who were lagging behind: they had no fear of God. When the LORD your God gives you rest from all the enemies around you in the land he is giving you to possess as an inheritance, you shall blot out the name of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget!

.
See Nicolas Poussin’s painting “The Battle of Joshua with Amalekites".


In 1 Samuel 15:2–3, God tells King Saul:

I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them, put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

.
King Saul first warns the Kenites, friends of Israel, to leave the area. He then defeats the Amalekites but does not finish the task. He allows the Amalekite King Agag to live, plunders for himself and his army, and lies about the reason for doing so.
Saul’s rebellion against God is the reason he is rejected by God as king (1 Samuel 15:23).

The last mention of the Amalekites is in the book of Esther where Haman the Agagite tries to exterminate the Jews in Persia through order of King Xerxes. God saved the Jews in Persia, and Haman, his sons, and (the rest of) Israel’s enemies were destroyed instead (Esther 9:5–10): https://www.gotquestions.org/Amalekites.html
(https://archive.is/IQW2P)

[Firestarter]

While we have been made to believe that ancient Greece is the birthplace of rational thinking, science, philosophy and democracy, the truth is of course more sinister.
.

The official story is that Emperor Constantine (Emperor 306-337 AD) converted from Mithraism to Christianity on the eve of a battle in 312 AD. Constantine made Christianity the state religion. All subsequent emperors were openly hostile towards Mithraism: http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions ... ianity.htm
(archived here: http://archive.is/YnS6B)


After Emperor Constantine supposedly converted to Christianity in 312 AD, he maintained the title “Pontifex Maximus” - the high priest of paganism.

I searched the internet for a connection between Socrates, Plato and the Mithras cult, and found it, but NOT how I expected...

The symbolism and rituals of Roman Mithraism depended so much on Platonic philosophy that it can be seen as Neoplatonism.
The bull sacrifice in a cave, was similar to the cave in Plato’s Republic.
Mithra was called “demiurge and father of all things”, like the Platonic demiurge.
The Mithraic doctrine of the soul is linked with the myth of creation and (of course) Platonic philosophy. As in the Platonic Timaeus, the human soul came down from heaven, and was finally caught within the body after crossing the 7 spheres of the planets.
The task of life is to liberate one’s divine part (the soul) from the shackles of the body and to reascend through the 7 spheres to the eternal, unchanging realm of the fixed stars. This ascent to the sky was pictured as Mithra leaving earth in the chariot of the sun god.

.

The cave, both in Mithraic ritual and Platonic philosophy, served as the archetype of the cosmic microcosm, the place where the soul enters matter and from which it must ultimately ascend. Porphyry, the Neoplatonic philosopher who offers one of the most insightful ancient commentaries on Mithraic symbolism, explicitly identifies this connection.
...
Just as in Plato’s Republic (Book VII), the soul ascends from the darkness of the cave toward the light of the Good, so too does the Mithraic initiate move from ignorance toward gnosis, from material illusion toward cosmic order. Yet the Mithraic cave is not the prison of Plato’s allegory; it is the crucible of transformation. For Plato, the cave is an image of delusion; for the Mithraist, it is a sanctum of regeneration. Where the philosopher escapes the cave, the initiate masters it.
...
The cave’s darkness was not merely the absence of light; it was the primordial potential of creation. In Neoplatonic thought, the material world is not evil but the lowest manifestation of the divine, awaiting illumination by intellect, as Plotinus writes, “We must not despise the body, for even here the divine radiance shines; but we must ascend through its shadow to the source of light.”
...
Porphyry, following the Neoplatonic line of thought, identifies the bull as the symbol of the material world (Hyle). In De Abstinentia (2.56), he explains that the slaying of the bull by Mithras signifies “the subjection of matter to divine reason, the ordering of chaos by intellect.”
...
When all these elements are considered together; the animals, the torchbearers, Sol and Luna, the tauroctony reveals itself not as a narrative image but as a cosmic diagram, a visual mandala of Indo-European metaphysics. The figures form a sacred geometry: Mithras at the center as the mediating intellect; Sol and Luna above as the transcendent principles; the animals below as the material and psychic forces; and the torchbearers as the twin poles of cosmic rhythm. This structure corresponds to the Neoplatonic hierarchy: The One (Sol), Nous (Mithras), Psyche (Luna), and Hyle (the animals and bull). The initiate, standing before this image in the dim mithraeum, did not simply observe it entered it. His consciousness was aligned with its architecture, his soul rehearsed its ascent through ritual, and his inner world became the living reflection of the cosmos carved before him, as the Neoplatonist Iamblichus wrote, “Ritual images are not mere symbols but vehicles of divine presence; by contemplating them, the soul is raised to the reality they signify”[27] Thus, the tauroctony was not a teaching device but an instrument of transformation.

https://archive.is/d1oyQ


The truth about the trial and execution of Socrates in 399 BC for “corrupting the youth” has been deliberately obscured.
Socrates was not sentenced to death for asking philosophical questions, but sentenced for "his organisational role in a network that had attempted to destroy Athenian democracy".

While Socrates never produced any book, his legendary status was promoted through his disciple Plato, an aristocrat whose family was involved in the "Thirty Tyrants" coup.
Socrates, with Plato, were part of a network of aristocrats (some sort of "deep state"?!?) that orchestrated terror against the "democratic order". For Socrates and Plato, democracy was tyranny of the majority (really: of the lower class) over wisdom and virtue (really: tyranny of the elite).

Socrates' most prominent associates — Alcibiades, Critias, Charmides — were members of an aristocratic network hostile to Athenian democracy.
Critias — one of Socrates’s closest associates — led the oligarchic coup of 404 BC, which led to the short regime of the “Thirty Tyrants”.

The Academy Plato founded was not a university, but a cult - a closed brotherhood with political ambitions, property holdings, and initiation rites: https://www.globalresearch.ca/socrates- ... yr/5928383


As for another interpretation of “corrupting the youth”...
One of Socrates' most infamous students was Alcibiades.
According to Plato, the much older Socrates, was in a gay, sexual relationship (not platonic!) with the Athenian general Alcibiades, who was famous for his physical attractiveness.

See the 1777 painting "Alcibiades Being Taught by Socrates" by François-André Vincent. It depicts the feminine Alcibiades with Socrates.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260602081 ... 26?lang=en

[veritas]

While we have been made to believe that ancient Greece is the birthplace of rational thinking, science, philosophy and democracy, the truth is of course more sinister.
.

The official story is that Emperor Constantine (Emperor 306-337 AD) converted from Mithraism to Christianity on the eve of a battle in 312 AD. Constantine made Christianity the state religion. All subsequent emperors were openly hostile towards Mithraism: http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions ... ianity.htm
(archived here: http://archive.is/YnS6B)


After Emperor Constantine supposedly converted to Christianity in 312 AD, he maintained the title “Pontifex Maximus” - the high priest of paganism.

I searched the internet for a connection between Socrates, Plato and the Mithras cult, and found it, but NOT how I expected...

The symbolism and rituals of Roman Mithraism depended so much on Platonic philosophy that it can be seen as Neoplatonism.
The bull sacrifice in a cave, was similar to the cave in Plato’s Republic.
Mithra was called “demiurge and father of all things”, like the Platonic demiurge.
The Mithraic doctrine of the soul is linked with the myth of creation and (of course) Platonic philosophy. As in the Platonic Timaeus, the human soul came down from heaven, and was finally caught within the body after crossing the 7 spheres of the planets.
The task of life is to liberate one’s divine part (the soul) from the shackles of the body and to reascend through the 7 spheres to the eternal, unchanging realm of the fixed stars. This ascent to the sky was pictured as Mithra leaving earth in the chariot of the sun god.

.

The cave, both in Mithraic ritual and Platonic philosophy, served as the archetype of the cosmic microcosm, the place where the soul enters matter and from which it must ultimately ascend. Porphyry, the Neoplatonic philosopher who offers one of the most insightful ancient commentaries on Mithraic symbolism, explicitly identifies this connection.
...
Just as in Plato’s Republic (Book VII), the soul ascends from the darkness of the cave toward the light of the Good, so too does the Mithraic initiate move from ignorance toward gnosis, from material illusion toward cosmic order. Yet the Mithraic cave is not the prison of Plato’s allegory; it is the crucible of transformation. For Plato, the cave is an image of delusion; for the Mithraist, it is a sanctum of regeneration. Where the philosopher escapes the cave, the initiate masters it.
...
The cave’s darkness was not merely the absence of light; it was the primordial potential of creation. In Neoplatonic thought, the material world is not evil but the lowest manifestation of the divine, awaiting illumination by intellect, as Plotinus writes, “We must not despise the body, for even here the divine radiance shines; but we must ascend through its shadow to the source of light.”
...
Porphyry, following the Neoplatonic line of thought, identifies the bull as the symbol of the material world (Hyle). In De Abstinentia (2.56), he explains that the slaying of the bull by Mithras signifies “the subjection of matter to divine reason, the ordering of chaos by intellect.”
...
When all these elements are considered together; the animals, the torchbearers, Sol and Luna, the tauroctony reveals itself not as a narrative image but as a cosmic diagram, a visual mandala of Indo-European metaphysics. The figures form a sacred geometry: Mithras at the center as the mediating intellect; Sol and Luna above as the transcendent principles; the animals below as the material and psychic forces; and the torchbearers as the twin poles of cosmic rhythm. This structure corresponds to the Neoplatonic hierarchy: The One (Sol), Nous (Mithras), Psyche (Luna), and Hyle (the animals and bull). The initiate, standing before this image in the dim mithraeum, did not simply observe it entered it. His consciousness was aligned with its architecture, his soul rehearsed its ascent through ritual, and his inner world became the living reflection of the cosmos carved before him, as the Neoplatonist Iamblichus wrote, “Ritual images are not mere symbols but vehicles of divine presence; by contemplating them, the soul is raised to the reality they signify”[27] Thus, the tauroctony was not a teaching device but an instrument of transformation.

https://archive.is/d1oyQ


The truth about the trial and execution of Socrates in 399 BC for “corrupting the youth” has been deliberately obscured.
Socrates was not sentenced to death for asking philosophical questions, but sentenced for "his organisational role in a network that had attempted to destroy Athenian democracy".

While Socrates never produced any book, his legendary status was promoted through his disciple Plato, an aristocrat whose family was involved in the "Thirty Tyrants" coup.
Socrates, with Plato, were part of a network of aristocrats (some sort of "deep state"?!?) that orchestrated terror against the "democratic order". For Socrates and Plato, democracy was tyranny of the majority (really: of the lower class) over wisdom and virtue (really: tyranny of the elite).

Socrates' most prominent associates — Alcibiades, Critias, Charmides — were members of an aristocratic network hostile to Athenian democracy.
Critias — one of Socrates’s closest associates — led the oligarchic coup of 404 BC, which led to the short regime of the “Thirty Tyrants”.

The Academy Plato founded was not a university, but a cult - a closed brotherhood with political ambitions, property holdings, and initiation rites: https://www.globalresearch.ca/socrates- ... yr/5928383


As for another interpretation of “corrupting the youth”...
One of Socrates' most infamous students was Alcibiades.
According to Plato, the much older Socrates, was in a gay, sexual relationship (not platonic!) with the Athenian general Alcibiades, who was famous for his physical attractiveness.

See the 1777 painting "Alcibiades Being Taught by Socrates" by François-André Vincent. It depicts the feminine Alcibiades with Socrates.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260602081 ... 26?lang=en

Sorry, I've never read anything more stupid from you. Where did you get all this?

[veritas]

While we have been made to believe that ancient Greece is the birthplace of rational thinking, science, philosophy and democracy, the truth is of course more sinister.
.

The official story is that Emperor Constantine (Emperor 306-337 AD) converted from Mithraism to Christianity on the eve of a battle in 312 AD. Constantine made Christianity the state religion. All subsequent emperors were openly hostile towards Mithraism: http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions ... ianity.htm
(archived here: http://archive.is/YnS6B)


After Emperor Constantine supposedly converted to Christianity in 312 AD, he maintained the title “Pontifex Maximus” - the high priest of paganism.

I searched the internet for a connection between Socrates, Plato and the Mithras cult, and found it, but NOT how I expected...

The symbolism and rituals of Roman Mithraism depended so much on Platonic philosophy that it can be seen as Neoplatonism.
The bull sacrifice in a cave, was similar to the cave in Plato’s Republic.
Mithra was called “demiurge and father of all things”, like the Platonic demiurge.
The Mithraic doctrine of the soul is linked with the myth of creation and (of course) Platonic philosophy. As in the Platonic Timaeus, the human soul came down from heaven, and was finally caught within the body after crossing the 7 spheres of the planets.
The task of life is to liberate one’s divine part (the soul) from the shackles of the body and to reascend through the 7 spheres to the eternal, unchanging realm of the fixed stars. This ascent to the sky was pictured as Mithra leaving earth in the chariot of the sun god.

.

The cave, both in Mithraic ritual and Platonic philosophy, served as the archetype of the cosmic microcosm, the place where the soul enters matter and from which it must ultimately ascend. Porphyry, the Neoplatonic philosopher who offers one of the most insightful ancient commentaries on Mithraic symbolism, explicitly identifies this connection.
...
Just as in Plato’s Republic (Book VII), the soul ascends from the darkness of the cave toward the light of the Good, so too does the Mithraic initiate move from ignorance toward gnosis, from material illusion toward cosmic order. Yet the Mithraic cave is not the prison of Plato’s allegory; it is the crucible of transformation. For Plato, the cave is an image of delusion; for the Mithraist, it is a sanctum of regeneration. Where the philosopher escapes the cave, the initiate masters it.
...
The cave’s darkness was not merely the absence of light; it was the primordial potential of creation. In Neoplatonic thought, the material world is not evil but the lowest manifestation of the divine, awaiting illumination by intellect, as Plotinus writes, “We must not despise the body, for even here the divine radiance shines; but we must ascend through its shadow to the source of light.”
...
Porphyry, following the Neoplatonic line of thought, identifies the bull as the symbol of the material world (Hyle). In De Abstinentia (2.56), he explains that the slaying of the bull by Mithras signifies “the subjection of matter to divine reason, the ordering of chaos by intellect.”
...
When all these elements are considered together; the animals, the torchbearers, Sol and Luna, the tauroctony reveals itself not as a narrative image but as a cosmic diagram, a visual mandala of Indo-European metaphysics. The figures form a sacred geometry: Mithras at the center as the mediating intellect; Sol and Luna above as the transcendent principles; the animals below as the material and psychic forces; and the torchbearers as the twin poles of cosmic rhythm. This structure corresponds to the Neoplatonic hierarchy: The One (Sol), Nous (Mithras), Psyche (Luna), and Hyle (the animals and bull). The initiate, standing before this image in the dim mithraeum, did not simply observe it entered it. His consciousness was aligned with its architecture, his soul rehearsed its ascent through ritual, and his inner world became the living reflection of the cosmos carved before him, as the Neoplatonist Iamblichus wrote, “Ritual images are not mere symbols but vehicles of divine presence; by contemplating them, the soul is raised to the reality they signify”[27] Thus, the tauroctony was not a teaching device but an instrument of transformation.

https://archive.is/d1oyQ


The truth about the trial and execution of Socrates in 399 BC for “corrupting the youth” has been deliberately obscured.
Socrates was not sentenced to death for asking philosophical questions, but sentenced for "his organisational role in a network that had attempted to destroy Athenian democracy".

While Socrates never produced any book, his legendary status was promoted through his disciple Plato, an aristocrat whose family was involved in the "Thirty Tyrants" coup.
Socrates, with Plato, were part of a network of aristocrats (some sort of "deep state"?!?) that orchestrated terror against the "democratic order". For Socrates and Plato, democracy was tyranny of the majority (really: of the lower class) over wisdom and virtue (really: tyranny of the elite).

Socrates' most prominent associates — Alcibiades, Critias, Charmides — were members of an aristocratic network hostile to Athenian democracy.
Critias — one of Socrates’s closest associates — led the oligarchic coup of 404 BC, which led to the short regime of the “Thirty Tyrants”.

The Academy Plato founded was not a university, but a cult - a closed brotherhood with political ambitions, property holdings, and initiation rites: https://www.globalresearch.ca/socrates- ... yr/5928383


As for another interpretation of “corrupting the youth”...
One of Socrates' most infamous students was Alcibiades.
According to Plato, the much older Socrates, was in a gay, sexual relationship (not platonic!) with the Athenian general Alcibiades, who was famous for his physical attractiveness.

See the 1777 painting "Alcibiades Being Taught by Socrates" by François-André Vincent. It depicts the feminine Alcibiades with Socrates.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260602081 ... 26?lang=en

Sorry, I've never read anything more stupid from you. Where did you get all this?