Victims of the Dutch dictatorship

Discussion on creating and maintaining Conflicts of Law
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Victims of the Dutch dictatorship

Post by Firestarter » Tue Mar 20, 2018 4:24 pm

According to the state propaganda over here in the Kingdom the Netherlands, we have wonderful freedoms, including “freedom of speech”.
Dutch people who take these freedoms a little too literally are known to meet unfortunate “accidents” and get into legal trouble...


Somebody named Erwin Lensink has an interesting “conspiracy” site that’s blatantly blocked by Google, Yahoo and their ilk; it’s probably one of the better Dutch “conspiracy” sites: http://erwinlensinkvrij.nl/english

After Lensink’s mother died, officially of a suicide, since April 2008, he was repeatedly harassed by the cops. This includes being locked up in custody of the police and forced mental evaluation by psychiatrist.
On 21 September 2010 (derde dinsdag van September), out of frustration, Lensink threw a small object at “De Gouden Koets” (with then Queen Beatrix in it).
Since then Lensink has repeatedly been locked up and tortured by sadistic psychiatrists

Lensink continues to protest against the Dutch Dictatorship, including several legal procedures (besides his personal website).
In May 2014, Lensink found out that the claws of the Dutch Royal family reach into Germany. He was arrested in Münster, when he was standing with a protest sign waiting for King Willem-Alexander and Queen Maxima (in Dutch): https://www.parool.nl/binnenland/waxine ... ~a3662425/

Lensink’s sign refers to the (Nazi) Rost van Tonningen, German boy Manuel Schadwald (who was sexually abused and murdered in the Netherlands) and the Joris Demmink “affair” (the cover-up to hide the ritual child abuse by the Dutch elite, including Royal family).
Image

Lensink amongst others calls our greatly beloved Royal Family “bastards”, and has “evidence” (or at least strong arguments) to support that claim.
Lensink calls this treason. Lensink also calls our Royal family despots and the Dutch Monarchy a “dictatorship”.

When King Willem III married Queen Emma he was in his 60s and (probably) already infertile. This means that Wilhelmina (daughter of Emma, and later Queen) and her offspring have no right to the throne: http://vivanepotista.com/post/508648823 ... l-house-of

In December 2016, a homeless man reported that Erwin Lensink was again locked up by insane psychiatrists, and that he himself received several threats for trying to contact Lensink (in Dutch): http://nicovandenham2.blogspot.nl/2016/ ... n-der.html


On 14 July 2016, a citizen of the Netherlands got sentenced to 30 days in jail of which 16 days conditionally with probation of 2 years (coincidentally had already spent 14 days in pre-trial detention) for insulting King Willem-Alexander.
On Facebook, this “criminal” called our greatly beloved King: murderer, rapist, oppressor, thief, and subject(?). He had also photoshopped the face of Willem-Alexander on the head of the victim of an execution.
The verdict showed that his own attorney had pleaded against him: https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archiv ... lt/491498/


I think it could be argued that the Orange-Nassau billionaires have abused their dictatorial powers, to steal, finance the Armenian genocide, finance Hitler and were/are involved in mass murder, for example in Serbia and Afghanistan.
For information on the destruction and looting of (former) Yugoslavia, with the help of Mabel Wisse Smit, who later married Prince Friso and cofounded Warchild Netherlands: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 1038#p3773

It’s much harder to prove that Willem-Alexander personally have been involved in these Royal prerogatives.

In December 2002, Prince Bernhard complained to Forbes that the wealth of the Dutch Royal family was exaggerated and demanded that the figure is lowered. In 2002, the net worth of the Dutch Royal family was $2.5 billion; in 2003, their wealth dropped to $250 million (and has stayed in the hundreds of millions since).
The assets of the Orange-Nassaus included some 10% of the stocks Royal Dutch Shell and they are also majority shareholders in other companies.
Republican Association member Hans van den Bergh (who died in 2011 of “cancer”) estimated the worth of the Orange-Nassaus between $17 billion and $23 billion, including Rembrandt paintings and silver from tsarist Russia: http://www.newsweek.com/fall-royal-fortune-138375

The history of Prince Bernhard, cofounder of Bilderberg, WWF and the 1001 Club, is filled with corruption. Prince Bernhard was heavily involved in the international weapons trade. Even before that he worked for a subsidiary of the notorious Nazi/Rockfeller/Ford company - IG Farben.
At the beginning of the 1950s, Bernhard was trading weapons to Indonesia and tried to stage a coup, he also tried in vain to exchange devaluated Dutch-Indonesian banknotes, which would’ve cost the Dutch tax payer 50 million guilders.
Bernhard received some 2 million dollar from the American corporations Lockheed and Northrop. After this was found out he could even keep the money (but promised to donate this to a good cause...), the chairman of the commission that investigated was a mister A.M. Donner (see below for more on his sone Piet Hein Donner): http://theunhivedmind.com/UHM/prince-be ... nferences/

At one time Willem-Alexander (then Crown Prince) was on the board of directors of the Dutch central bank (DNB).
It was “democratically” decided that the tax payers had to buy the DNB, for much more than the market value (while the Dutch Royal family still decides what happens).
They also “democratically” had their palaces “sold” for much more than the market price, while only the Royal family are allowed to live in these palaces.

In another great example of “democracy”, it was decided that the Dutch taxpayers gave a yacht to Princess Beatrix for a birthday present - the Groene Draeck.
For many years the yearly maintenance costs for the Groene Draeck cost the tax payer 95,000 euro per year. Experts say that the yearly maintenance costs for such a ship are about 32,500 euro.
From 2004 to 2015 alone, the Dutch taxpayer paid 1.5 million Euro on maintenance for the boat (for which 2 boats could have been bought). It is apparently very difficult to find out where this surplus money went: http://www.theroyalforums.com/tag/groene-draeck/

According to PM Mark Rutte (who studied history in Leiden with then Prins Pils Willem-Alexander) there is no reason at all to make changes in the arrangement of the maintenance of the Groene Draeck.
For some reason, an independent investigation isn’t be supported by our wonderful (puppet) politicians (in Dutch): http://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/06/02/ond ... e-a1406807


In May 2015, the Public Prosecutor charged an Arab Muslim with insulting our King for a fine of 500 Euro, because on 16 November 2014 he had said “Fuck the King” (Fuck de Koning). The complete insulting text was: “Fuck the king, fuck the queen, fuck the royal family”.

Then something strange happened…
Fuck the King” became a popular expression amongst the Dutch public.
On 7 May 2015, “Fuck the King” was sprayed on the stolen Amsterdam “Palace” on the Dam (stolen by the Dutch Royal family, who promised to give it back...).
Image

On 28 May 2015, the Public Prosecutor withdrew the charges against this activist…
The Prosecutor said to accept the defence that the royal family had been involved in slavery: https://nltimes.nl/2015/05/28/prosecuti ... -king-case


On 30 April 2013, at the coronation of King Willem-Alexander at the Dam in Amsterdam, 2 protesting Republicans were locked up (taken hostage) for 2 hours – Joanna van der Hoek and Hans Maessen.

Joanna held up a sign with the text “I am not a subject”.
Before the festivities, 12 photos (including of Joanna) had been given to the patrolling cops. Eleven of these “dangerous” people (including Erwin Lensink?!?) had to be removed from the Dam ASAP; Joanna was on the 12th picture...
Mayor of Amsterdam and lawyer Eberhard van der Laan (now burning in hell…) confirmed that locking up Joanna and Hans was inappropriate. Van der Laan claimed that Hans was erroneously seen as one of the 11 “dangerous” people.

See Joanna with her sign “I am not a subject”.
Image

Joanna, had earlier been detained in Utrecht when (then) Queen Beatrix visited, and she held up a sign with: “It is 2013”.
At that time, the police and Mayor of Utrecht Aleid Wolfsen also confirmed that locking her up had been illegal (in Dutch): https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2013/05/14/po ... n-a1434764

Joanna tried to get some media attention, and claimed to be handled too rough by the cops.
After she was released, incorrigible Joanna went back to the Dam with her sign, but cops forbade her (in Dutch): http://socialisme.nu/blog/nieuws/35389/ ... d-gemaakt/


Gepke de Leef was born in 1956 and functioned “normal” until 2006 (with a steady job for 34 years). In 2006 she became disabled after being abused by the police - including a “vaginal inspection”. Gepke was made homeless by the Dutch government in 2008.

Gepke has repeatedly been put in jail after being fined by the police and not being able to pay these tickets.
Gepke has repeatedly been tortured by sadistic psychiatrists , not only with antipsychotics but also with electroshocks (ECT). In the Netherlands some 700 people per year are tortured with electroshocks.

Gepke was sentenced for her website, on which she names the policemen and psychiatrists that have tortured her. Because she has refused to change her website, she can be locked up at any time by the police (lijfsdwang).
Here is the court order of 1 April 2014 (no joke) where Gepke was sentenced for her website; including imprisonment and a fine in money of 1000 euro per week (in Dutch): http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inzien ... :2014:1104

The Dutch court admitted that Gepke was unlawfully locked up for 68 days in 2006. For this she got awarded compensation in damages of 5217 euro (including costs for attorney of 357 euro). Usually attorneys demand much more money, but if we follow the 357 euro from the court judgement of 29 March 2007, Gepke got 4860 euro or 71.47 euro per day or 3 euro per hour of being unlawfully locked up.
Gepke was smashed against a car by the police, which led to the following injury.
Image

Gepke de Leef has been handled so roughly by the police in October 2013 that she’s sitting in a wheelchair since. Because of this abuse her legs have gotten infected. As she is homeless this has deteriorated which could make her lose her legs.
Image

Gepke continues to protest, and by her own account sits daily protesting in her wheelchair in front of the police department Hoofddorp.

On her own website (no longer active) Gepke in particular pointed at the Nazi history of the Dutch Royal family, and of the family Donner. Piet Hein Donner is a former Minister and currently vice-chairman of the Raad van State (chaired by King Willem-Alexander).
She also claims that she was robbed out of the inheritance of her father by a nurse with the cooperation of the Rabobank.
Her website was deleted. A lot of it has been copy-pasted here, but without the comments on the Dutch Royal family and Donner (in Dutch): https://onrecht.wordpress.com/de-zaak-gepke-de-leef/


None of these “activists” have exposed the ritual child abuse by the Dutch elite.
In the Netherlands, sexual abuse by the elite was already commonplace some hundred years ago at the Round House in Nunspeet of Frank van Vloten. Prince Hendrik (husband of Queen Wilhelmina) was a regular guest at the Round House.

In 1916, the corpse of a girl was found there. In 1917 another dead girl was found.
Around 1924, three corpses of girls were found during a police investigation. This investigation was stopped from higher up. Bones were excavated here around 1982.
The Dutch author Frederik van Eeden from 1886 to 1907 was married to Frank's sister Martha van Vloten. With financial support from Frank, Van Eeden set up the Walden colony (a commune). When he divorced Martha; that was also the end of Walden.

In 1950 the book "The Round House" by Michael Sadleir was published, this has disappeared (also from the history books).
J.W. Montenberg reported on what a lieutenant of well-to-do family told him about paedophilia in the Round House around 1921 and researched further. In 1980 Montenberg was harassed by the BVD that had his archive confiscated: http://www.place4free.com/Hiddenworld/Hidden133.htm
(archived here: http://archive.is/DnqAw)

Wim Klinkenberg also had some reports on the “Ronde huis”.
In Klinkenberg’s book “Prins Bernhard – een politieke biografie” no information on paedophilia however (in Dutch): http://crashrecovery.org/daily/14.12.20 ... 01986).pdf

In the following video, disbarred attorney Anne Marie van Blijenburgh tells that she was present at parties in the Netherlands where children from child detention centres were brutally raped and murdered.
Some of the notable guests present at these “parties”.

Prince Friso;
Mabel Wisse Smit (Friso’s wife);
An elderly man (probably) George Soros;
Piet Hein Donner;
PM Mark Rutte;

Geert Wilders (the Dutch politician with the most media attention);
Ernst Hirsch Ballin (former Minister);
Gerlof Leistra (journalist of Elsevier magazine);
Carla Eradus (President of the Court in Amsterdam).
https://youtu.be/SbhMfZRhsXw

There’s also a video of Toos Nijenhuis who testified that she was present at similar child sacrifice ceremonies (including paedophilia) in the presence of Prince Bernhard and Joseph Ratzinger (better known as the resigned pope Benedictus).
The video is difficult to watch because she doesn’t speak English very well and it’s not subtitled. Following is a 16:37 part of the complete video (where she names Prince Bernhard): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A1o1Egi20c


Tomorrow, 21 March, a “referendum” is staged on the Dutch Law for the intelligence agencies “Wet op de Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdiensten”,
According to Article 21 of the “Wet op de Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdiensten”, the AIVD and MIVD can engage in any criminal activity and infiltrate in any criminal organisation (the translation is mine)…
1.
The services are authorised to:
a. employ natural persons, whether or not undercover of an assumed identity or capacity, which are the responsibility of an intelligence service:
1 °. to collect information about persons and organisations that may be of importance to an intelligence service;
2 °. to promote or take measures to protect the interests of an intelligence service.
b. establish and deploy legal entities to support operational activities.
(…)
3.
The natural person, referred to in the first paragraph, under a, may also be instructed by the intelligence service to carry out actions that result in cooperation with a criminal offense or commit a criminal offense. An instruction as referred to in the first sentence is only given if the proper execution performance of the task of the intelligence service or the safety of the natural person involved so requires.
(…)
7.
By or pursuant to a general Order in Council, on the recommendation of the relevant Ministers and Our Minister of Security and Justice jointly, further rules may be laid down with regard to:
a. the conditions under which and the cases in which, in order to execute an instruction by a natural person as referred to in the first paragraph, part a, actions may be carried out which may result in cooperation in the commission of a criminal offense, or commit a criminal offense;
(in Dutch): http://maxius.nl/wet-op-de-inlichtingen ... /artikel21


In the Netherlands what is called a “referendum” is really a “poll”.
In the Netherlands a landslide voted against the EU/Ukraine association agreement, with a 61% against, 39% for.
King Willem-Alexander went ahead as if nothing happened because he has no reason at all to repect his subjects: http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/ ... ree-travel
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Amsterdam Mayor and the 3 billion metro

Post by Firestarter » Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:50 pm

On 5 October 2017 the Amsterdam Mayor, former minister and crooked lawyer Eberhard van der Laan died of “cancer”. It took until 12 July 2018 (more than 9 months) until King Willem-Alexander appointed Femke Halsema (a woman and no Jew for a change) as the new Mayor.
Halsema is best known as the leader of the Groen Links party (Green Left) from 2002 to 2010.
In January 2011, Halsema “left” politrics to continue lying to the public as a reporter and also worked as a “freelance” director, advisor.

On 21 July 2018, Mayor Halsema officially opened the Noord/Zuidlijn (North/South line) metro (at long last) – article in Dutch: https://nos.nl/artikel/2242534-noord-zu ... mmers.html

It was planned that during rush hour 12 metros would ride an hour.
This turns out to be only 10 metros (maximum) per hour because of some “problems” – article in Dutch: https://www.parool.nl/amsterdam/noord-z ... ~a4589029/

According to the original 1996 plan the Noord/Zuidlijn would be finished in 2005 for 1.5 billion guilders (681 million Euro).
The Dutch government inflated the costs to a whopping 3.1 billion Euro (more than 4.5 times the originally planned costs) for a mere 9.7 kilometre (of which only 7.1 kilometre underground). That’s 319.6 million Euros per kilometre!
As usual the estimated amount of passengers was much higher than the amount that will actually travel on the Noord/Zuidlijn.

According to the Dutch state propaganda corruption is typical for South Europe and third world countries…
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

ING Bank money laundering; support Syrian terrorists

Post by Firestarter » Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:37 pm

Between May 2015 and spring 2018 the government of the Netherlands supported 22 armed “moderate groups” in Syria. Which “freedom fighters” received help remained secret, but it has since been found out that one of these “moderate groups” is Jahbat al-Shamiya.
Last spring, the Dutch government suddenly stopped supporting Syrian “rebels” who were fighting against Syrian President Assad.

In March 2017, the Dutch court sentenced Driss M. (42) to 3 years in prison, of which 1 year conditional, because he had joined Jahbat al-Shamiya in 2015 and prepared for the Jihad to kill people.
In 2018, Jahbat al-Shamiya fighters fought with the Turkish army in the attack on Syrian-Kurdish militias in the North Syrian region of Afrin. The Dutch state propaganda “criticised” the offensive by Turkey.

Israel’s favourite Dutch politician Geert Wilders got the most attention in the press. Wilders said: “The Dutch government supports terrorists abroad and lets them roam freely inland” and proposed to rename the cabinet “Willem-Alexander I” to "Terror I'.

The Netherlands has allocated over $80 million to Syrian opposition groups (including the White Helmets).
The Dutch state propaganda has stressed that these “moderate rebels” didn’t receive weapons, but instead more than 25 million Euros worth of trucks (313), communication equipment, uniforms, food, medicines, tents and training. The trucks and communication equipment were of course used in combat, but never mind the facts (in Dutch): https://sputniknews.com/europe/20180911 ... errorists/

This really shows that today’s “moderate rebels” are tomorrow’s “extremist terrorists”.
This also shows that the Dutch courts are as corrupt as you can get. The “little” Muslim, of which it has not even been claimed that he killed anybody, gets sentenced to 2 years in prison, while the responsible government officials won’t get any punishment (let alone our head of state King Willem-Alexander).
The Minister, who is constitutionally responsible but has nothing to say over his “ministry”, might make some public apology (written by officials in his “ministry”).

In the meantime the mass migration of Syrians to Europe continues. For more information on the war against Syria: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 1071#p3732


Removed part of post on money laundering to “new” thread: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... f=7&t=1477

Keywords: “ING Groep, settled the case, Ralph Hamers, Curacao, Cuba, Iran, Myanmar, Sudan, VEON, VimpelCom, Russian Alfa Bank, Spectrum Health, DeVos family, Koos Timmermans, Surinam, EY accountant
Last edited by Firestarter on Wed Oct 10, 2018 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Victims of the Dutch dictatorship

Post by Firestarter » Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:30 pm

Firestarter wrote:
Tue Mar 20, 2018 4:24 pm
There’s also a video by Toos Nijenhuis who testified that she was present at similar child sacrifice ceremonies (including paedophilia) in the presence of Prince Bernhard (coincidentally similar to “Bernard”) and Joseph Ratzinger (better known as the resigned pope Benedictus).
The video is difficult to watch because she doesn’t speak English very well and it’s not subtitled. Following is a 16:37 part of the complete video (where she names Prince Bernhard): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A1o1Egi20c
It must be “difficult” to cover up the horrible story of child abuse (including ritual child sacrifice) of Toos Nijenhuis. How could they do it?
Maybe publishing stories on scandals that are a lot less damaging...

In October 2016, an official (!) biography by Jolande Withuis of Queen Juliana was released.
In this book some shocking stories on the “womanizer” Prince Bernhard were detailed, including Prince Bernhard sexually assaulting an underage girl. Bernhard groped a 16-year-old girl, who was staying in a room at the Soestdijk palace, under her blouse and kissed her on the mouth. The girl managed to get him out of the room before Bernhard could go any further.
The biography also describes that Bernhard assaulted a young member of Juliana’s drama club after inviting her to come see paintings in his office: https://www.thedailyherald.sx/regional/ ... n-suriname


Yesterday a story was published by the “reputable” NRC newspaper that details not that Cardinal Alfrink was present at ritual gatherings were children were brutally sexually abused and sacrificed to Lucifer.
It does expose that Cardinal Alfrink covered up the child abuse by other Catholic priests.

Between 1945 and 2010, 20 of the 39 Dutch cardinals, and (assistant) bishops covered up abuse cases in the Dutch Catholic Church.
Four of these 39 abused children themselves: Jan Niënhaus (Utrecht), Jo Gijsen (Roermond), Philippe Bär (Rotterdam) and Jan ter Schure (Den Bosch).
Sixteen others relocated paedophile priests, so they could continue to abuse children.

Cardinal Alfrink was involved in covering up for and transferring at least 5 paedophiles.
In 1956, a pastor who had been sentenced to 4 months in prison for abusing underage girls was transferred from Zutphen, to Slagharen and to Netterden. In Netterden, the priest once again sexually abused a girl, after which he was transferred to Eemnes in 1967 and finally to Lunteren.

In 1960, a chaplain in Groenlo fondled underage boys. In 1963, Alfrink was warned about his behaviour, but he became pastor and was relocated to Herwen and then to Aerdt.
In 1967, Alfrink placed a pastor of whom he knew that he was guilty of paedophilia to Haarle where in 1971 he again sexually abused children.

In 1973, Alfrink promoted a chaplain, who had confessed to molesting boys, to pastor and then transferred him from Utrecht to Braamt, where he continued to abuse boys.
In 1974, Alfrink promoted a chaplain, of whom it was known that he had molested altar servers, to parish priest and relocated him from Arnhem to Albergen, where he abused at least another 9 altar servers (in Dutch): https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2018/09/14/bi ... d-a1616595
(archived here: http://archive.is/nIjeY)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Victims of the Dutch dictatorship

Post by Firestarter » Fri Sep 28, 2018 4:33 pm

When I call our beloved King a ruthless dictator, my fellow countrymen usually reply with some nonsense that “because” the Netherlands is a “democracy” our King only has a function of ceremony.
If I continue I usually say that our Constitution shows that our King is nothing but a dictator. Then I can expect some insults with the always valid propaganda that we couldn’t be fooled so easily.
At this moment I usually stop talking as it would be too foolish to argue with a fool that believes he is too smart to be fooled...

Here are some of the constitutional rights of King Willem-Alexander:
Proposes new laws, and can refuse Royal assent to laws;
Selects spokespersons (ministers) for his cabinet;
Appoints the heads of provinces and cities (mayors);
Appoints the judges;
Can grant pardon.

You might wonder why our King can refuse his assent to laws. This is because our “tweede kamer” could also (hypothetically) propose new laws.
Of course our King can also dismiss parliament …

After the King proposes a new law (bill) it is first sent to the “tweede kamer”;
Only if a majority of the “tweede kamer” votes in favour of the bill it is sent to the “eerste kamer”;
Only if the “eerste kamer” votes in favour and the King assents it, will the bill become part of the legislation.

Our “tweede kamer” is democratically elected, but our “eerste kamer” (in one of those great examples of Dutch democracy) is elected by the democratically elected “Provinciale Staten” (that vote on the bills proposed by the heads of provinces).
You can imagine that “because” the Netherlands is a democracy the King cannot be held accountable for his crimes against humanity...


Carla del Ponte, who resigned as leading UN investigator on Syria in 2017, has stated that she’s shocked that the Dutch government in 2015 decided to support Syrian terrorists.

Del Ponte says that already in 2013, the human rights commission of the United Nations reported that ALL groups fighting in Syria are guilty of war crimes.
Del Ponte also says that the Netherlands completely knew about these reports. Del Ponte specifically names Dutch UN Ambassador Karel van Oosterom, who “knew exactly what was in our reports”.

Already in 2013, the UN explicitly reported that the Sultan Murad Brigade was perpetrating war crimes.
The Sultan Murad Brigade was one of the Syrian terrorist groups supported by the Netherlands from 2016 to 2018: https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2018/0 ... -in-syria/


In 2013, the Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports asked Duthler's consultancy firm Duthler Associates, of member of the “eerste kamer” Anne-Wil Duthler, to advise to get a new bill through parliament (the Social Support Act).
This task wasn’t publicly tendered, but simply given to Duthler, because "lack of time". Duthler got paid 76.960 Euro (without btw taxes).

In 2013, the same department also paid Duthler Associates 74.185 Euro (without btw taxes) for another task. Nobody has disclosed whether this task was publicly tendered.

The Social Support Act got sort of controversial and after passing through the “tweede kamer” it only passed through the “eerste kamer” with one vote - Anne-Wil Duthler voted for the bill (for which she was paid some 150,000 Euro)...
According to ethics “experts”, Duthler acted unethically by voting for the law in accordance with the advice of her own company: https://nltimes.nl/2018/09/25/liberal-s ... sed-report

This wasn’t the first time that Duthler Associates got paid taxpayers money from the government.
In 2004, the tax department forgot to publicly tender a large consultancy job to Duthler Associates (owned by VVD senator Anne-Wil Duthler). Duthler made a whopping 8.9 million Euros from this assignment from 2004 to 2009 (1.5 million Euro per year).
The project for the tax department was led by Duthler’s husband André Biesheuvel.

The tax department violated the law because they have to publicly tender contracts worth more than 137,000 Euros at a European level (in Dutch): https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2009-10-14/kame ... thler-vvd/

The ethics “experts” don’t mind that the Dutch government bribes an MP with taxpayers money.
These “experts” also don’t think it’s strange that Anne-Wil Duthler is also an attorney at First Lawyers. Of course it wouldn’t be strange if somebody hires a law firm for an exorbitant fee; this would make it easier to (for example) pay kickbacks to Duthler…
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

The Netherlands, Agent Orange and toxic waste

Post by Firestarter » Sun Oct 07, 2018 4:54 pm

We all “know” how terrible it was what the US army did in Vietnam. And we can also speak shame of the big US companies that made money from producing the highly toxic Agent Orange by companies like Monsanto and Dow Chemical.
Regularly stories like the following are published in the Dutch (and British) media.

Even in 2018, children are still the victim of the terrible effects of Agent Orange (nobody can be expected to clean this up of course)…
See this severely affected infant by Agent Orange.
Image
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ities.html


Most people don’t even know about the involvement of the Kingdom of the Netherlands – specifically the Philips “electronics” company that’s so close to our Royal family.
During WW II Philips was (also) collaborating very well with the German Nazis…

In 1961 Philips acquired the US company Thompson Hayward that became very profitable after JFK was assassinated and President Lyndon B. Johnson increased the war effort against Vietnam (to as many as 500,000 US soldiers).

Starting in 1961, Thompson Hayward was 1 of 7 (?) companies that supplied Agent Orange to the US army. American veterans settled their case against Thompson Hayward in 1984, after Philips had sold it in 1981.
Several court case were also brought against Thompson Hayward for producing asbestos: https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2007/0 ... -asbestos/


Another subsidiary of Philips, Philips-Duphar, produced 2,4,5-T (Agent Orange) in Weesp, the Netherlands.

During and after the end of the Vietnam War the toxic waste was dumped in the Volgermeerpolder just North of Amsterdam. After the scandal broke (or did it?) they simply let the dioxins stay in the ground which poisoned the ground water all around Broek in Waterland because cleaning up would be too expensive: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9431741
(archived here: http://archive.is/AbrPW)


In 1980, chauffeur Sierck Buwalda found some suspicious containers with a label “Philips Duphar” at the garbage disposal site Volgermeerpolder of the city Amsterdam. He shows it to his father, who agrees that this is highly suspicious and raises the alarm at the action group “Vereniging Behoud Waterland” (Waterland is where the Volgermeerpolder is located).
After the first stories in the press appear about the toxic waste, Buwalda is swiftly fired for blowing the whistle.

The chemical concerns (it wasn’t only Philips Duphar) that dumped their toxic waste defended themselves in the following court case that they didn’t know about the health hazards.
The city council of Amsterdam also said that they couldn’t have known that dumping toxic waste could become a problem…
In 1994, Philips-Duphar was acquitted from paying damages caused by their handling of highly toxic material before 1975 because they couldn’t have known.

In 1963, there was an accident at Philips Duphar where large amounts of dioxin were released (that is created in the production of Agent Orange).
Twelve years later 4 of the 6 people that cleaned up after the disaster had died.

Thanks to the best media in the world, scandals aren’t any sort of threat to the powers that should not be, but offer great business opportunities.
After the discovery of the toxic waste they waited another 20 years, and in 2003 started the “clean up”, which was nothing but simply covered up with clean ground brought in from elsewhere, and as somebody has to pay, it were the Dutch taxpayer that had to cough up 100 million Euros.
In 2011, the Volgermeerpolder was relabelled as a nature reserve…

In Rotterdam toxic waste was refused at the city dump (in Dutch): http://www.volgermeer.nl/Artikel/202/De ... te-gifbelt


The Volgermeerpolder isn’t the only place where Amsterdam city officials made money by dumping toxic waste.
According to dioxin expert Kees Olie at the Diemerzeedijk the concentrations of dioxin are 10 times higher than even at the Volgermeerpolder.

Where at the Volgermeerpolder the toxic waste was simply dumped, at the Diemerzeedijk they had the even better plan to burn (at least 80,000 barrels of toxic waste), so that they dioxin could spread over a large area.
Engineering firm Grontmij estimates that the total amount of contaminated soil on the Diemerzeedijk is 3.1 million cubic meters.

Only when the wind was favourable, blowing away from densely populated areas like Diemen, the barrels could be burned. Otherwise inhabitants complained about the smell of the black clouds with dioxin, heavy metals and the carcinogenic benzopyrene.
Sometimes barrels flew hundreds of meters into the air and ended up in the Amsterdam-Rhine Canal. The stuff that didn’t flowed into the IJsselmeer.

Henk Griffioen ran the garbage dump. It wasn’t only Philips-Duphar, but also Philips, Royal Dutch Shell, KLM, Ford, NSDM and Akzo-Ketjen that dumped their toxic waste here.
The Diemerzeedijk even became known internationally for dumping toxic waste, corporations sent trucks from Spain, Italy, Finland, and even East European countries like Poland and Czechoslovakia. German giant corporations like Bayer and BASF dumped their waste here and Griffioen remembers large trailers from a military airport near Frankfurt with loads of green barrels; he thinks they were labelled “NATO”.

Griffioen says that after he refused to dump any more toxic waste on his property, they city took his license and took over the garbage dump, who continued the practice of dumping and burning highly toxic material.

In the mid-1970s, ice destroyed a large part of the coast at the fire pit: a piece of 40 by 100 meters disappeared into the IJsselmeer. Nobody stopped the poison from leaking into the water.
Griffioen complained with a letter to the city council, which did nothing for almost 15 years. It was not until 1989 that Rijkswaterstaat put an emergency dam to prevent further toxic waste flowing into the water.

Next to the Amsterdam Diemerzeedijk is the internationally protected bird area IJmeer and since then a new part of the city of Amsterdam (IJburg) was built next to the Diemerzeedijk (in Dutch): https://www.martinzuithof.nl/ijburg/poe ... dijk-1997/
(archived here: http://archive.is/S4Ncu)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Mayor Van der Laan supported Jihad recruitment

Post by Firestarter » Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:25 pm

The crooked lawyer Eberhard van der Laan is better known as the Mayor of Amsterdam and is now burning in hell…

In 2006, the 22-year-old Bilal L. was sentenced to 3 years in prison because he was trying to recruit fellow prisoners for the Jihad in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Bilal was in jail for death threats against Israel’s favourite Dutch politician Geert Wilders.
Bilal was part of the Hofstad group that was involved in the murder of Pim Fortuyn’s good friend, Theo van Gogh.
Because of his criminal record, Bilal couldn’t work as a social worker for the city of Amsterdam, but then Mayor Eberhard van der Laan stepped in to personally request that Bilal, who had recruited Muslims for the Jihad, would get a special dispensation so he could work as a social worker for Dynamo in March 2013. Never mind those silly laws…
He later continued his social work for Streetcornerwork.

In 2014, Het Parool newspaper wrote that Bilal:
tried to seduce youths into visiting a training camp for Jihadists in Pakistan or Afghanistan. Now he tries to keep youngsters on the straight and narrow in Amsterdam. The municipality helped deradicalise Bilal after his prison sentence. But according to those in the know, he doesn’t hold high hopes for the Amsterdam approach to extremists youths.
His sister (18) chose to go on jihad in Syria earlier this year, even though the municipality had her in its scope for being a potential ‘traveller’.
(…)
The director chose to employ him deliberately. ‘Bilal is a good youth worker. He gives guys the idea that they can participate again.’

Bilal’s brother also travelled to Syria.
When Bilal travelled to Jordan with a colleague to “help” Syrian refugees, he was repeatedly hugged by men in long beards. His colleague found it inappropriate that he spoke to the Syrians on how Shiite Muslims and Iran should be fought. The colleague told about this after they returned to Amsterdam.

In 2015, when the “Je suis Charlie” hysteria was staged, one of Bilal’s clients, Abderrazak A. O. threw a firebomb at a house in Amsterdam, probably because it had a Charlie Hebdo poster in the window. Abderrazak was sentenced to 3 ½ years in prison.
Abderrazak had earlier travelled to Turkey to join the Jihad, and it was Bilal that helped him to return to the Netherlands without punishment.

Bilal stopped working for Streetcornerwork in April 2015. It is not known what he has been doing since: https://theoldcontinent.eu/mayor-020/
(archived here: http://archive.is/9snSa)


In 2015, Mayor Eberhard van der Laan visited the victims of the fire and brought presents with him.
Van der Laan and his delegation advised them to NOT speak to the press about what had happened (in Dutch): https://tpo.nl/2018/11/05/eberhard-van- ... te-praten/
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Victims of the Dutch dictatorship

Post by Firestarter » Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:20 pm

We NEED to import massive amounts of migrants because of the lower fertility rates there are "too" many pensioned people compared to "working" people...
Because of computer technology man is obsolete so most of these uneducated migrants can't get a "real" job. In the Netherlands unemployed people are forced to do things like "arrange traffic"; showing that they're worth less than a traffic sign.

Another great benefit of the migrants is that they keep the illusion of house shortage going, and the prices of houses high. In the Netherlands, we even have "rent subsidy" because people can´t afford the unrealistically high rents.
Expats are lured to the Netherlands with a 2 year tax exemption, which inflates rents and keeps wages low even more...
Who profits from this strategy?!?


In November 2017, it was first reported that Prince Bernhard Jr., cousin of King Willem-Alexander, owns 102 houses in Amsterdam, which are rented. Later that month it was reported that Bernhard Jr even owned 590 “addresses”; 349 of which in Amsterdam. These addresses are houses, apartments shopping centres and office buildings.
This earned him the nickname “pandjesprins”...

If I understand correctly a large part of this real estate is owned through Pinnacle BV that is owned by Bernhard Jr. and his business partners. I haven’t found out how much of it is personally owned by Bernhard Jr or who his business partners are.
Pinnacle has illegally demanded that the people who rent have to pay “sleutelgeld”, as an additional fee. Minister Ollongren confirmed that such practices are illegal in the Netherlands (in Dutch): https://www.amweb.nl/financiele-plannin ... -101106596


Last year, the city of Amsterdam fined Pinnacle BV for continuing to illegally rent houses to groups of people, even after it was warned several times.
Bernhard Jr. simply claimed that he didn’t know because others handled the affairs, but he was personally sent a letter to inform him on 19 June 2017…
In May 2018, Pinnacle was first granted permission to rent their addresses to larger groups.

Bernhard Jr also owns the circuit in Zandvoort and recently bought the Mediapark in Hilversum, where much state propaganda for Dutch TV is produced.
Sure… independent media.

A member of parliament (Tweede Kamer) Wybren van Haga, who owns dozens of addresses, was likewise fined for illegally renting one of his houses to 6 persons (in Dutch): https://www.parool.nl/amsterdam/dwangso ... ~a4620449/ (archived here: http://archive.is/y6hH3)


The following article shows that in 2018 Pinnacle sold a single office building for 21.5 million Euros to La Française Real Estate Managers. And then renting property in the same building.
In 2017, Pinnacle sold property to a French investor for almost 96 million Euro (in Dutch): https://www.vastgoedmarkt.nl/belegginge ... -101130546


Of course we can’t expect our wonderful media to estimate the worth of these 590 “addresses” and the circuit in Zandvoort and Mediapark. I think it’s safe to estimate the net worth of the 590 addresses at more than 400 million Euros...
In 2009, Forbes magazine estimated Queen Beatrix’s (mother of now King Willem-Alexander) wealth at a low $200 million.

Just 10 years earlier, in 1999, Forbes estimated Queen Beatrix’s worth at £25 billion.
Noting that that a reliable calculation had been made impossible by the Dutch secrecy: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/jun ... rchy.world


In 2003, the grandfather of Willem-Alexander and Bernhard Jr., husband of former Queen Juliana Prince Bernhard, phoned Christopher Forbes, who is married to his German niece, and demanded to stop printing exaggerations of his family fortune.
Forbes told him to call editor Luisa Kroll, who personally arranged that the official wealth of the Dutch family was brought further down from $2.5 billion in 2002 to $250 million in 2003: https://www.newsweek.com/fall-royal-fortune-138375
(archived here: http://archive.is/aoSe2)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Dutch railroads – crimes against humanity

Post by Firestarter » Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:28 pm

Every single day Dutch articles are published that taxes are so high because the Kingdom of the Netherlands is such a wonderful “care state” (verzorgingSStaat).


From 2004 to 2011, the municipality of Tilburg forced more than 800 welfare recipients to remove paint from old trains destined for the rail museum, or they would lose their benefits.
Even though they knew that the paint contained chromium 6 that causes cancer.

After a committee decided that the the state-owned rail company NS (Nederlandse Spoorwegen), Railway Museum, and the municipality of Tilburg are responsible for their health damage, Erik de Ridder (for the Tilburg local council) and NS chairman, former minister Roger van Boxtel (a.k.a. Rogier) announced they will give a whopping €7,000 to every worker exposed to chromium 6 and on top of that €5,000 to €40,000 for people who have fallen ill.

The total pay is restricted to a maximum of €10 million.
Over the last years it was repeatedly denied that their health problems were caused by their forced labour.

The victims’ lawyer Yme Drost said that this offer is a “noble gesture”.
These ungrateful bastards even complain, because they think that a human life is worth more than €7,000.

The arrangement still has to be accepted by the Tilburg council: https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2019/02/j ... pensation/


In November 2018, the NS agreed to pay compensation to survivors and relatives of only the Jews transported by their trains to the Nazi concentration camps during the second world war.
From July 1942 to September 1944, the NS was paid €2.5m (£2.2; $2.8m) in today’s money for delivering 102,000 Jews, prisoners of war and labourers to Germany and Poland. In 2005, NS’s chief executive Aad Veenman apologised for their service to the Nazis. Reportedly only 5,000 Jews survived.

The predecessor of Arcadis (de Nederlandsche Heidemaatschappij) and Philips profited from slave labour during the occupation by the German Nazis.

In 2014, under pressure from US politicians, the French railways operator SNCF agreed to pay £40 million in compensation for moving some 76,000 Jews to concentrion camps during WW II of which reportedly only about 3,000 survived: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... eath-camps


In 1944, Queen in exile Wilhelmina complimented the employees of the NS for doing their patriotic duty.
Even after the war, Minister for transport Steef van Schaik said that tranporting the Jews to the concentration camps was demanded by the Dutch government in exile because it was good for the Dutch economy.

On 17 September 1944, the Dutch government in London, in support of the starvation in the coming winter (hongerwinter), called to stop the trains through Radio Oranje (in Dutch): http://www.drentheindeoorlog.nl/?aid=519 (archived here: http://archive.is/rWNnU)


Am I mistaken that the Jews didn´t look terribly stressed out for being transported to the concentration camps?
https://youtu.be/9a-Pt0fA_2w
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Victims of the Dutch dictatorship

Post by Firestarter » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:47 pm

The new Vice-President of the Raad van State, Thom de Graaf, is a former minister and was a prominent member of the D66 party.
Roger van Boxtel was (also) of D66.


In 2017, more than 200 people filed charges against leader of D66 Alexander Pechtold. They complained that Pechtold had received the gift to live for free at an appartment in Scheveningen from former Canadian Ambassador in Bosnia Serge Marcoux.
Pechtold should have registered this “gift”.

The Procureur-Generaal at the Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) decided that this isn’t suspicious and closed the case.
The District Attorney (Openbaar Ministerie), I’m not sure if this is even authorised to prosecute members of the Tweede Kamer, also closed the case.

Pechtold resigned on 9 October 2018 (in Dutch): https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/ni ... ppartement


In January 2016, Wassila Hachchi, another politician of D66, got adverse publicity after she resigned to join the presidential campaign of none other than Hillary Clinton.
Because they made a deal that she was working “as a volunteer” the Dutch taxpayer continued to pay her 6,800 euros per month in non-active allowance: https://nltimes.nl/2016/02/18/dutch-mp- ... -volunteer

In October 2018, shortly after Alexander Pechtold resigned, Hachchi announced that she rejoined D66. She has the right on non-active allowance until April 2019....


Not many people know that the Dutch government is one of the BIGGEST donors of the Clinton Foundation.
The Postcodeloterij alone has donated 27.7 million Euros since 2005 (one of only 3 that donated more than $25 million until the first half of 2015): https://www.philanthropy.com/article/Cl ... -to/232059
Post Reply