[Our Brother Eugene Milton, by the Grace of God, is currently (and has been over the past 75 years, or
so) sojourning in the Minnesota territory.
We do hope that his article will be for everyone's edification. For those who are led to seek further
fellowship with him, his contact information will appear at the end of this article.
While reading it, keep in mind that our Father's Word tells us, and His Spirit bears witness, that
only when a people obey His voice, will He be an enemy unto their enemies, and an adversary unto their
adversaries.]
Greetings in the Mighty Name of our Lord and Saviour Jesus, the Christ!!!
There is one lawgiver--not many as the liars have told us (James 4:12).
".....if the LORD be God, follow Him: but if Baal [*Caesar], then follow him [*them]." I King 18:21
(KJV)
No man can serve two masters (Matthew 6:24), not even by cunning craftiness. All human "so-called"
governments are cults, as evidenced by the fact that:
"Those who worship the State will tolerate no rival faith." Sir Edmund Burke
"No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please Him who
hath chosen Him to be a soldier." 2 Timothy 2:4 (KJV)
"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye
obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16 (KJV)
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also
reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to Me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also
forget thy children." Hosea 4:6 (KJV)
Terrorism or The Rod of Correction?
There has been much conversation, and many implied threats of revenge since the events of eleven
September two thousand and one, even to the threat of war! (That has now come to pass.) But, I ask,
"Whose definition of terrorism are we accepting?"
'Personally,' I find it absolutely amazing that the hijacking of four aeroplanes, the destruction of two
buildings, and the partial destruction of a third, is considered "terroristic," and the cold-blooded murder of
the defenseless unborn is considered a "right" by nine derelict attorneys known as the supreme Court
(most often spelled Supreme Court)--which is another blasphemy against the Creator of this world and all
that therein is--because the the Supreme Judge is the entirety of the Supreme Court.
However, making light of and ignoring the Commands of the Creator is nothing new, or different. It
began in the garden of Eden [*the garden of Delight in the Septuagint], and has persisted ever since.
There are many historical evidences of evilly "inspired" men who were going to outsmart God. They
have all failed, and will continue to fail! Why? Because the Law(s) of the Almighty are immutable --and
while they may be disregarded, evaded, eluded, dodged, ducked, ignored, made fun of, mocked and
laughed at, or whatever--they are etched in the granite of His integrity, and will remain so until the end
of time:
"For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from
the law, till all be fulfilled." Matthew 5:18 (KJV)
It may also come as a shock, to all who have received a commercial education, that men have never-ever been given the authority to "make law(s)," With their fleshly and personal pride, arrogance,
haughtiness, insolence, and much overrated opinion of their knowledge and self-worth, combined with
their ego(s) beguiling them to believe they can make law(s), but are in truth limited by their "humanness"
to making only suggestions in the form of rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes. These by
comparison to Law(s) are mere suggestions, because rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes are only
enforceable when voluntarily submitted to. That hard fact is never admitted to by any attorney, judge,
politician or other defender of "the god known as the government, or the State." The withholding of that
fact from the people at-large is an act of deception that only supporters of Lucifer could engage in; for,
while simultaneously pillaging and plundering the very folks whom they "claim" to work for/represent,
they enslave them to make-believe and imaginary "law", so-called.
To clarify the matter, the following is a well-known definition of a politician:
"1. One versed or experienced in the science of government. 2. One addicted to, or actively engaged
in, politics as managed by parties; often, one primarily interested in political offices or the profits from
them as a source of private gain."
I am fully aware that no lawyer or politician will openly agree to the reality of the same, because to do
so would absolutely document the age-old truth that:
"If it weren't for lawyers and politicians, no one would ever believe they needed them!"
To these lawyers and politicians: What an empty feeling to realize that, at best, you have been a parasite
feeding off the ignorance of those whom you have claimed to "educate"--not teach--and for eons you
have managed to work the scam to your "perceived" advantage.
Again, the hard fact is:
"There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another? James
4:12 (KJV)
The Author of the Law states with extreme clarity the above Truth; and further, that:
"Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that
ye may keep the commandments of the LORD [*YHVH] your God which I command you."
Deuteronomy 4:2 (KJV)
And a second witness is found at Deuteronomy 12:32:
"What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from
it." (KJV)
There are defenders of the "mockers" who vehemently insist that so-called man-made law(s) are
modeled after God's Law(s), which is an open-faces lie, as the straight forward (not froward) command is:
"....thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it."
Where am I going with all of this? Straight forward to the "politically acceptable," but vehemently
denied "double standard" as practiced by those purported "leaders" of the U.S.A.
First of all, America imagines it has legalized "a-b-o-r-t-i-o-n," which is an absolute total impossibility
by virtue of the fact that "a-b-o-r-t-i-o-n" is Lawful, and was initiated and authorized by the Creator
Himself. "A-b-o-r-t--i--c-i-d-e" is the name of the crime the supreme Court perceives it has the authority
to make "legal," attempting to nullify the Creator's Law, which states with no ambiguity whatsoever, that,
"Thou shalt not do wanton murder," (Exodus 20:13). And take special notice of Deuteronomy 4:2 and
12:32, supra.
Let it be known--while I have no agreement with the perpetrators of the events that transpired on
eleven September two thousand and one--I have no more agreement with any man or group of men,
irrespective of their personally assumed "whizz-dom" and imaginary authority,who thumb their noses at
the Almighty Creator by stating in effect, "We'll commit murder if we want!" The most amazing thing
about such activities by them, is that they apply a pious countenance while having the audacity to ask for
God's blessings and mercy to save?heal our land; and that after His Word has either been evicted from, or
locked out of virtually every "government" space in the country by the very who all of a sudden "seem" to
recognize that there's "No power or authority other than Almighty God!" What an act!
The "terrorists" destroyed possibly five to eight thousand lives. Yet, those venerable old murderers in
the supreme Court have authorized the wanton murder of thirty-three million totally defenseless unborn,
and that total goes back at least ten or more years. Who is threatening to hunt those murders down, and
eliminate them from the face of the earth? Well, for what it's worth, I'll offer a hint:
"Offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High: And call upon me in the day
of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify me. But unto the wicked [*that's all of the
wicked--titles and origins not with standing] God saith, What hast thou to do to declare my statutes,
or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth? Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my
words behind thee. When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentedst with him, and hast been partaker
with adulterers. Thou givest thy mouth to evil, and thy tongue frameth deceit. Thou sittest and
speakest against thy brother; thou slanderest thine own mother's son. These things hast thou done, and
I kept silence; thou thoughtest that I was altogether such an one as thyself: but I will reprove thee, and
set them in order before thine eyes. Now consider this, ye that forget God, lest I tear you in pieces, and
there be none to deliver. Whoso offereth praise glorifieth me: and to him that ordereth his conversation
aright will I shew the salvation of God." Psalms 50:14-23 (KJV)
I would also add the following as an aid to clarifying the above:
"And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in
thine own eye?......Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see
clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother's eye." Luke 6:41-42 (KJV)
There is, and has been, conversation all of my life about those who have died in vain. It is in that light
that I sincerely ask: who of you can imagine a more vain sacrifice of life than that taken from the
defenseless unborn? The shysters authorized it, as if in deed and in fact they had the authority to do so;
and the preachers are speechless and impotent, because if they open their mouths to preach the true Law
of God, they will lose their 501(c)(3) status with the government [*the bribe], in spite of the fact that all
public servants take an oath to uphold the Constitution for the United States of America, which states
clearly and unequivocally that: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..." Please take notice that the make-believe so-called "law" was
initiated by an imaginary administrative agency, and voluntarily accepted as law by the unincorporated
Churches.
So how did those who claim to be of the Christ's ekklesia become a ward of the State and separated
from the True Master they claim to serve? By seeking the solace of incorporation, and becoming an object
of the commercial world--for its illusory benefits--thereby casting off its relationship with the Almighty
Creator to partake of the imaginary benefits of mammon. This is nothing more than a reenactment of, and
submission to, "Did god really say that?," i.e., "Incorporation is good for you! It will protect you from
lawsuits and all that kind of stuff." This is one more absolute truth that there is only one Lawgiver, not
many, as the liars have whispered.
It is the failure, for whatever "reason" to comprehend that fact, that has virtually handcuffed these
purported servants of the Lord, and enslaved them to multiple gods they have never known and should
have never never met.
But our Lord's remnant continue to serve Him in spirit and in truth.
The following is contact information for further fellowship with our Brother:
Brother Eugene Milton
general delivery
New Auburn, Minnesota
(320) 864-4128
Temporary romantic relationship focused on current
enjoyment/pleasure without future commitments;
usually one of series of relationships
Parentally authorized romantic relationship focused
on serious contemplation and hope of future marriage;
hopefully, but not necessarily, sole romantic relationship
before marriage
Romantic relationship following publicly announced,
irrevocable commitment to marriage; allows couple to
"fall in love" before marriage, but after commitment is made
Scriptural Terminology & Definition
No; term "dating" never used in Scripture;
best described by the scriptural term "defrauding" (1 Thessalonians 4:6)
No; term "courtship" never used in Scripture;
some scriptural principles consciously applied,
particularly warning against "defrauding" (1 Thessalonians 4:6)
Yes; term "betrothed" used frequently in both Old
and New Testaments; God, in Deuteronomy 22:22-29, at least
reinforces pattern by specifying punishments within
three distinct marital states: single, betrothed, and married
Timing Sequence of Emotional Oneness
Physical attraction, begin dating, romantic
cultivation, emotional oneness (fall in love),
assume Lord's will, engagement, irrevocable(?)
commitment at marriage
Attraction, parental authorization of courtship,
seeking Lord's will, romantic cultivation, emotional
oneness (fall in love), confirm Lord's will, parental
authorization for marriage, engagement, irrevocable
commitment at marriage
The Lord's direction to one, confirmed by parents,
then by all, publicly announced irrevocable commitment
at betrothal, romantic cultivation, emotional oneness
(fall in love), marriage authorizes full physical union
Termination Procedure
Either party may terminate relationship any time, for any reason
Either party may terminate relationship any time, for any reason
Betrothal can only be terminated on the basis of infidelity;
requires scriptural divorce
Purpose
Current enjoyment; exploration of compatibility for
possible future relationship
Exploration of compatibility for possible future relationship
Cultivation of romance in preparation for spiritual
and emotional unity in marriage
Parental Involvement
Generally considered irrelevant
Parental authorization required throughout courtship;
may be revoked at any time; authorization for marriage
may or may not be included in courtship authorization
Full parental blessing required before betrothal
commitment; thereafter parental authorization is
irrevocable except in the event of infidelity
Activities/Motivation
Entertainment in groups or as couple alone;
effort to impress and please other to retain
or move forward in relationship; fear of being
rejected (defrauded/broken-hearted)
Entertainment in groups or as couple alone;
compatibility for marriage explored seriously;
effort to impress and please due partly to fear
of being rejected (defrauded/broken-hearted)
Following betrothal ceremony time of separation
in preparation for marriage with full confidence;
commitment eliminates fear of defrauding; direct
communication controlled, focused on spiritual and
emotional unity
Physical Affection
Generally acceptable to some pre-determined
point short of full physical union; opens the door to temptation
Generally acceptable to some pre-determined
point short of full physical union; parental involvement
limits, but does not preclude temptation
No physical contact whatsoever until the wedding;
betrothal period is for spiritual and emotional preparation
(falling in love), not physical affection
Possibility/Likelihood of DEFRAUDING (1 Thessalonians 4:6)
Virtually inevitable; hearts are melded
together romantically, then ripped apart repeatedly;
flirtation (defrauding) is expected and institutionalized
Unlikely if both parties court only each other;
however, some court a series of prospective spouses before
making commitment -- thus defrauding happens
Virtually impossible given irrevocable nature
of betrothal and avoidance of romantic cultivation prior
to betrothal; emotionally as well as physically one-woman
men and one-man women